LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilmot, Natalie; Rushton, Diane; Zandona Hofmann, Anelise Seleme (2016)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Business schools have the responsibility of preparing students for work in multicultural organizations and global markets. This paper examines a situated learning experience for undergraduates through a virtual collaboration between a UK university and a Brazilian university. This facilitated remote communication using social media and smart devices, allowing students from both institutions to enhance their cross-cultural management competencies.\ud \ud A qualitative approach was used for the research, drawing on the reflections of the tutors from both institutions, and feedback received from students in the UK and Brazil.\ud \ud This paper provides empirical observations regarding the use of this innovative pedagogic approach, generating discussion of the implications for teaching, thus contributing to the literature on international collaborations in cross-cultural management education.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • AACSB. (2013). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation [online]. Retrieved November 19, 2014 fromhttp://www.aacsb.edu/~/media/AACSB/Docs/Accreditation/ Standards/2013-business-standards.ashx
    • Abrahamse, A., Johnson, M., Levinson, N., Medsker, L., Pearce, J.M., Quiroga, C., & Sciep,iRo.n (2015). A virtual educational exchange: A north-south virtually shared clasbsleon sustaina developmentJ.ournal of Studies in International Education1,9, 140-159.
    • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K.Y., Templer, K.J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N.A20.0(7). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and efects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performanMcea.nagement and Organization Review, 3, 335-371.
    • Bailey, R.2(013). Exploring the engagement of lecturers with learning and teaching agendas throug a focus on their beliefs about, and experience with, studentStusudpiepsoirntH.igher Education, 38, 143-155.
    • Bain, J.D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N2.0C0.2(). Relecting on practice: Student teachers' perspectives. Flaxton: Post Pressed.
    • Baker, T., & Clark, J. (2010). Cooperative learning - A double-edged sword: A cooperative learning model for use with diverse student grIonutpersc.ultural Education2,1, 257-268.
    • Barcyzk, C.C., & Duncan, D.G. (2012). Social networking media: An approach for the teaching of international businJeosus.rnal of Teaching in International Busines2s3, , 98-122.
    • Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studyi n.gHawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
    • Blessinger, P., & Anchan, J.P. (Eds.2)0(15). Democratizing higher education: International comparative perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
    • Boje, D. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication researc. hLondon: Sage.
    • Bovée, C., & hill, J2.0(13). Business communication today. (12th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
    • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychQoluoalgyit.ative Research in Psycholog,y3, 77-101.
    • Bruner, R.F., & Iannarelli, J2.0(11). Globalization of management educatJoiuornn.al of Teaching in International Business, 22, 232-242.
    • Butler, C., & Zander, L.2(008). he business of teaching and learning through multicultural teams. Journal of Teaching in International Busines1s9, , 192-218.
    • Byron, K. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? he communication and miscommunication of emotion by emailA.cademy of Management Review, 33, 309-327.
    • Catteeuw, P.2(013). Portfolio assessment and intercultural competen.cPeaper presented at the meeting of the 9th International Scientiic Conference of eLearning and sotware for Education, Bucharest.
    • Chappell, D.S., & Schermerhorn Jr.,1J9.R9.9(). Introducing international business experience through virtual teamworJko.urnal of Teaching in International Busines1s0, , 43-59.
    • Chelariu, C., & Osmonbekov, T2.0(14). Communication technology in international business-tobusiness relationshJiopusr.nal of Business and Industrial Marketin,g29, 24-33.
    • Christie, H., Barron, P., & D'Annunzio-Green, 2N0.1(3). Direct entrants in transition: Becoming independent learnerSs.tudies in Higher Education3,8, 623-637.
    • Currie, G. (2007). “Beyond our imagination”: he voice of international students on the MBA. Management Learning, 38, 536-556.
    • De Vita, G. 2(000). Inclusive approaches to efective communication and active partiicnipation the multicultural classroom: An international business managemenAtctcivoentLeaxrtn.ing in Higher Education1,, 168-180.
    • Dewaele, J.-M. (2002). Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 productionI.nternational Journal of Bilingualis, m6, 23-38.
    • Diamond, A., Walkley, L., Forbes, P., Hughes, T., & Sheen2,0J1.1(). Global graduates: Global graduates into global leade.rsLeicester: Association of Graduation Recruiters, Council for Industry and Higher Education and CFE Research and Consulting.
    • Doerry, E., Klempous, R., Nikodem, J., & Paetzold, W2.0(04). Virtual student exchange: Lessons learned in virtual international teaming in interdisciplinary desigenducation. Proceedings of the Fith International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Esdtuacnabtuilo,n, I Turkey, 650-655.
    • Dyment, J.E., & O'Connell, T.S.20(10). he quality of relection in student journals: A review of limiting and enabling facItnonrosv.ative Higher Education3,5, 233-244.
    • Elliott, C.J., & Reynolds, M20.1(4). Participative pedagogies, group work and the international classroom: An account of students' and tutors' experieSntcueds.ies in Higher Education,39, 307- 320.
    • Elton, L.1(996). Strategies to enhance student motivation: A conceptualSatnuadlieyssiins.Higher Education, 21, 57-68.
    • Erez, M., Lisak, A., Harush, R., Glikson, E., Nouri, R., & Shoke2f0,1E3.)(. Going global: Developing management students' cultural intelligence and global identity in culturally dimvesr.se virtual tea Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12, 330-355.
    • Fougère, M., & Moulettes, A2.0(12). Disclaimers, dichotomies and disappearances in international business textbooks: A postcolonial deconstrucMtiaonna.gement Learning, 43, 5-24.
    • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study researQchua.litative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
    • Gavidia, J.V., Hernández Mogollón, R., & Baena, C2.0(05). Using international virtual teams in the business classroomJ.ournal of Teaching in International Busines1s6, , 51-74.
    • Gillispie, M. D20.1(4). From notepad to iPad: Using apps and web tools to engage a new generation of students. New York, NY: Routledge.
    • Griiths, D.S., Winstanley, D., & Gabriel2,0Y0.5(). Learning shock: he trauma of return to formal learningM.anagement Learning, 36, 275-297.
    • Henderson, J.K. (2005). Language diversity in international management tInetaemrnsa.tional Studies of Management and Organization, 35, 66-82.
    • Hofstede, G. 2(001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institiuonts, and organizations across nations. (2nd ed.). housand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Holmes, P., & O'Neill, G2.0(12). Developing and evaluating intercultural competence: Ethnographies of intercultural encountInertse.rnational Journal of Intercultural Relatio3n6s, 707-718.
    • House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V.2(004). Culture, leadership and organizations: he GLOBE study of 62 societies. housand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Hung, S.-Y., Kang, T.-C., Yen, D.C., Huang, A.H., & Chen, K. 2(012). A cross-cultural analysis of communication tools and communication outcoJomuerns.al of Global Information Manageme,nt 20, 55-83.
    • Hunter, B., White, G.P., & Godbey, G.C20. 0(6). What does it mean to be globally compeJotuernnta?l of Studies in International Education,10, 267-285.
    • Hutchens, J.S., & Hayes, T2.(014). In your Facebook: Examining Facebook usage as misbehavior on perceived teacher credibilEidtucya.tion and Information Technologi,es19, 5-20.
    • Istance, D., & Kools, M. 2(013). OECD work on technology and education: Innovative learning environments as an integrating framewEourkro.pean Journal of Education,48, 43-57.
    • Jameson, D.A. (2007). Reconceptualizing cultural identity and its role in intercultural business communicationJo.urnal of Business Communication, 44, 199-235.
    • Johnson, P., & Duberley, J2.(000). Understanding management research. London: Sage.
    • Joy, S., & Poonamallee, L.2(013). Cross-cultural teaching in globalized management classrooms: Time to move from functionalist to postcolonial appArocacdhemeys?of Management Learning and Education, 12, 396-413.
    • Kimmel, K., & Volet, S2.0(12). University students' perceptions of and attitudes towards culturally diverse group work: Does context mattJeoru?rnal of Studies in International Educatio,n16, 157-181.
    • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L.2(005). Learners and learning in the twenty irst century: What do we know about students' attitudes towards and experienicnesfoofrmation and communication technologies that will help us design coSutursdeise?s in Higher Education3,0, 257-274.
    • Laurillard, D2.0(08). he teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education3,3, 139-154.
    • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participati.onCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Livingstone, D., & Lynch, K20.0(0). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two diferent experiencesS.tudies in Higher Education2,5, 325-345.
    • MacNab, B.R. (2012). An experiential approach to cultural intelligence edJouucrantailono.f Management Education, 36, 66-94.
    • Mellors-Bourne, R., Jones, E., & Woodield, S.20(15). Transnational education and employability development. York: he Higher Education Academy.
    • Montgomery, C. (2009). A decade of internationalisation: Has it inluenced students' views of crosscultural group work at universiJtouyr?nal of Studies in International Education1,3, 256-270.
    • Orland-Barak, L. (2005). Portfolios as evidence of relective practice: What remains 'untold'. Educational Researc h,47, 25-44.
    • Paul, P., & Mukhopadhyay, K2.00(5). Experiential Learning in international business education. Journal of Teaching in International Busines1s6, , 7-25.
    • Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D.A2.(007). Teaching the virtual generAatcaidoenm.y of Management Learning and Education, 6, 69-80.
    • Ramburuth, P., & Daniel, S2.01(1). Integrating experiential learning and cases in international business.Journal of Teaching in International Busines2s2, , 38-50.
    • Rutkowski, A.-F., Vogel, D., van Genuchten, M., & Saunders, 2C0.0(8). Communication in virtual teams: Ten years of experience in educatiIoEnE.E Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 302-312. doi1:0.1109/TPC.2008.2001252
    • Ryan, M. (2013). he pedagogical balancing act: Teaching relection in higher eTdeuachatiinogn. in Higher Education1,8, 144-155.
    • Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). heorising a model for teaching and assessing relective learning in higher educatiHoingh.er Education Research and Developme3n2t, 244-257.
    • Schön, D.A. 1(995). he relective practitioner: How professionals think in actio.nBurlington, VT: Ashgate.
    • Sethi, R.S2. 0(13). Role of technology in enhancing the quality of higher business managemen education - A descriptioInt.ernational Journal of Management Excellenc1e,,13-17.
    • Shore, S., & Groen, J.2(009). Ater the ink dries: Doing collaborative international work in higher educationS.tudies in Higher Education3,4, 533-546.
    • Sizoo, S., Serrie, H., & Shapero, M2.0(08). Revisiting a theory-supported approach to teaching crosscultural management skiJlolusr.nal of Teaching in International Busines1s8, , 83-99.
    • Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant Observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    • Steers, R.M., Nardon, L., & Sánchez-Runde, C2.(013). Management across cultures: Developing global competencies. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Stein, S.J., Isaacs, G., & Andrews, T.2(004). Incorporating authentic learning experiences within a university courseS.tudies in Higher Education2,9, 239-258.
    • Strauss, P., U, A., & Young, S. (2011). 'I know the type of people I work well with': Student anxiety in multicultural group projeScttusd.ies in Higher Education3,6, 815-829.
    • Szkudlarek, B., McNett, J., Romani, L., & Lane, H2.0(13). he past, present, and future of crosscultural management education: he educators' perspectAicavde.emy of Management Learning and Education, 12, 477-493.
    • Sweeney, A., Weaven, S., & Herington, C. 2(008). Multicultural inluences on group learning: A qualitative higher educationAssteussdmy.ent & Evaluation in Higher Education3,3, 119-132.
    • Tipton, F.B. 2(008). “humbs-up is a rude gesture in Australia”: he presentation of culture in international business textboCorkitsi.cal perspectives on international busines,s4, 7-24.
    • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global busines.s(3rd ed.). London: Nicholas Brearley.
    • Turner, Y. (2009). “Knowing me, knowing you”, is there nothing we can do?: Pedagogic challenges in using group work to create an intercultural learningJospuarncea.l of Studies in International Education, 13, 240-255.
    • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: he development of higher psychological pro.cCesasmesbridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Wang, R., Scown, P., Urquhart, C., & Hardman, J.2(014). Tapping the educational potential of Facebook: Guidelines for use in higher educEatduicoant.ion and Information Technologi,es19, 21-39.
    • Warwick, S., Blackburn, M., & Booth, L2.01(4). Real worlds e-assessment using Google sit.es8th International Technology, Education & Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 5843-5490.
    • Watson, W.E., Johnson, L., & Zgourides, G.D2.0(02). he inluence of ethnic diversity on leadership, group process, and performance: An examination of learning teaInmtesr.national Journal of Intercultural Relation2s,6, 1-16.
    • Westwood, R. (2006). International business and management studies as an orientalist discourse: A postcolonial critiCquriet.ical Perspectives on International Business2,, 91-113.
    • Woodcock, B., Middleton, A., & Nortclife, 2A0.1(2). Considering the smartphone learner: An investigation into student interest in the use of personal technology to enhance their lear Student Engagement and Experience Journal,1, 1-15.
    • Zainuba, M., & Rahal, A2.0(12). Using cross-cultural dimensions exercises to improve and measure learning outcomes in international business coJuoursrensa. l of Teaching in International Busin,ess 23, 201-221.
    • Zhu, Y., & Bargiela-Chiappin2i0,1F3.)(. Balancing emic and etic: Situated learning and ethnography of communication in cross-cultural management educaAtciaodnem.y of Management Learning and Education, 12, 380-395.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article