LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Robinson, L; Hogg, P; Higgins, RN
Publisher: WB Saunders
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: health_and_wellbeing
Abstract
\ud This paper reports the evaluation of a European funded 3-week summer school which took place in 2013 involving 60 staff and students from five universities. The evaluation looked at one group in detail using a qualitative approach to consider whether students and teachers can work together in multicultural groups in order to achieve their goal.
\ud Method
\ud One group was observed during 2 two-hour sessions of group activity; at the beginning and end of the summer school task. Video data was analysed using the Rapport Management framework, a model of cross-cultural communication, to determine what motivated this group’s interactions.
\ud Results
\ud As the group’s deadline became imminent ‘face-threatening acts’ (FTAs) were more apparent. These were tolerated in this group because of the development of a strong social bond. There was inequity in participation with members of the group falling into either high- or low-involvement categories. This was also well-tolerated but meant some students may not have gained as much from the experience. The group lacked guidance on managing group dynamics.
\ud Conclusion
\ud Cultural differences in communication were not the main threat to multi-cultural working groups. Potential problems can arise from failing to provide the group with a framework for project and team management. An emphasis on ground rules and the allocation of formal roles is important as is the encouragement of socialisation which supports the group during challenging times.
\ud \ud
\ud Keywords: Rapport management; inter-cultural communication; Erasmus; group work; observation
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. British Council Erasmus [online] http://www.britishcouncil.org/erasmus-background.htm [accessed 21/1/14]
    • 2. British Council. IPSOS Public affairs, Boos, Allen, Hamilton. Culture AT WORK The value of intercultural skills in the workplace [online] http://www.britishcouncil.org/culture-at-workresearch_march_2013.pdf 2013 [accessed 21/1/14]
    • 3. Taylor I, Burgess H. Responding to 'Non-traditional' Students: An Enquiry and Action Approach. The Challenge of Problem-based Learning. D. Boud and G. Feletti. London, Kogan 1997; Page: 103-16.
    • 4. McLean MJ, van Wyk JM, Peters-Futre EM, Higgins-Opits SB. The small group in problembased learning: more than a cognitive 'learning' experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population. Medical Teacher 2006; 28(4): E94-E103.
    • 5. Mills PC, Woodall PF, Bellingham M, Noad M, Lloyd S. Using group learning to promote integration and cooperative learning between Asian and Australian second-year veterinary science students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 2007; 34(3): 350-5.
    • 6. Singaram VS, Dolmans DHJM, Lachman N, van der Vleuten CPM. Perceptions of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Group Effectiveness in a Socially-Culturally Diverse Medical Student Population. Education for Health 2008; 21(2): 1-9.
    • 7. Oetzel JG. Self-Construals, Communication Processes, and Group Outcomes in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups. Small Group Research 2001; 32(1): 19-54.
    • 8. Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA. Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence of Demographic Composition and Organizational Culture on Work Processes and Outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 1998;43(4): 749-80.
    • 9. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999; 44(1): 1-28
    • 10. Singaram VS, van der Vleuten CPM, Stevens F, Dolmans DHJM."For most of us Africans, we don't just speak": a qualitative investigation into collaborative heterogeneous PBL group learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education: 2010; 1-14.
    • 11. Robinson L. The influence of cultural diversity on student learning interactions: a qualitative study of rapport management in an undergraduate problem based learning group. Huddersfield, University of Huddersfield. EdD Thesis: 2011, p. 1-250.
    • 12. Spencer-Oatey H. Ed. Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness. London, Continuum; 2008, p.11-47
    • 13. Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK. Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance: Comparing Homogeneous and Diverse Task Groups. The Academy of Management Journal 1993 36(3): 590-602.
    • 14. Spencer-Oatey H. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 2002; 34(5): 529-45.
    • 15. Goffman E. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York, Pantheon;1967
    • 16. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. A simplistic systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974; 50(4): 696-735
    • 17. Brown P, Levinson SC. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press; 1987
    • 18. Maudsley G. Do we all mean the same thing by "problem-based learning"? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Acad Med 1999; 74(2): 178-85.
    • 19. Azer SA. Becoming a student in a PBL course: twelve tips for successful group discussion. Medical Teacher 2004; 26(1):12-15.
    • 20. Mete S, Yildirim Sari H. Nursing students' expectations from tutors in PBL and effects of tutors' behaviour on nursing students. Nurse Education Today 2008; 28(4): 434-42.
    • 21. Northedge A. Enabling Participation in Academic Discourse. Teaching in Higher Education 2003; 8(2): 169-80
    • 22. Moust JHC, van Berkel HJM, Schmidt HG. Signs of erosion: Reflections on three decades of problem-based learning at Maastricht University. Higher Education 2005; 50(4): 665-83.
    • 23. Haidet KK, Tate J, Divirgilio-Thomas D, Kolanowski A, Happ MB. Methods to improve reliability of video-recorded behavioural data. Research in Nursing & Health 2009; 32(4): 465-74
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article