Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Tulloch, Olivia; Mayaud, Philippe; Adu-Sarkodie, Yaw; Opoku, Baafuor; Lithur, Nana; Sickle, Eugene; Delany-Moretlwe, Sinead; Wambura, Mwita; Changalucha, John; Theobald, Sally (2011)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Health Research Policy and Systems
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: wa_525, Health Policy, wa_20_5, Research
Background\ud Research institutions and donor organizations are giving growing attention to how research evidence is communicated to influence policy. In the area of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and HIV there is less weight given to understanding how evidence is successfully translated into practice. Policy issues in SRH can be controversial, influenced by political factors and shaped by context such as religion, ethnicity, gender and sexuality.\ud \ud Methods\ud The case-studies presented in this paper analyse findings from SRH/HIV research programmes in sub-Saharan Africa: 1) Maternal syphilis screening in Ghana, 2) Legislative change for sexual violence survivors In Ghana, 3) Male circumcision policy in South Africa, and 4) Male circumcision policy in Tanzania. Our analysis draws on two frameworks, Sumner et al’s synthesis approach and Nutley’s research use continuum.\ud \ud Results\ud The analysis emphasises the relationships and communications involved in using research to influence policy and practice and recognises a distinction whereby practice is not necessarily influenced as a result of policy change – especially in SRH – where there are complex interactions between policy actors.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud Both frameworks demonstrate how policy networks, partnership and advocacy are critical in shaping the extent to which research is used and the importance of on-going and continuous links between a range of actors to maximize research impact on policy uptake and implementation. The case-studies illustrate the importance of long-term engagement between researchers and policy makers and how to use evidence to develop policies which are sensitive to context: political, cultural and practical.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Sumner A, Crichton J, Theobald S, et al: What shapes research impact on policy: Understanding research uptake in SRH policy processes in resource poor contexts. Health Research Policy and Systems , This supplement.
    • 2. Court J, Young J: Bridging Research and Policy: Insights From 50 Case Studies. In ODI Working Paper. Volume 213. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2003.
    • 3. Walt G, Gilson L: Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning 1994, 9(4):353-370.
    • 4. Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H: Using evidence: How Research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press; 2007.
    • 5. Crewe E, Young J: Bridging research and policy: context, evidence and links. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2002.
    • 6. Court J: Bridging Research and Policy on HIV/AIDS in Developing Countries. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2004.
    • 7. Dickenson C, Buse K: Understanding the politics of national HIV policies: the roles of institutions, interests and ideas. Technical Approach Paper HSLP. London; 2008.
    • 8. Gilson L, Raphaely N: The Terrain of Health Policy Analysis in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature 1994-2007. Health Policy and Planning 2008, 23(5):294-30.
    • 9. Greene D, David JL: A research design for generalizing from multiple case studies. Evaluation and Program Planning 1984, 7(1):73-85.
    • 10. Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al: Randomized controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Medicine 2005, 2(11):e298.
    • 11. Gray H, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, et al: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized trial. The Lancet 2007, 369:657-66.
    • 12. Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, et al: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet 2007, 369:643-56.
    • 13. Ministry of Health: South Africa National Strategic Plan for HIV/AIDS 2007 - 2011. Pretoria; 2007.
    • 14. UNAIDS/ WHO: AIDS epidemic update. Geneva: WHO; 2007, Accessed on 10.09.2009 from : http://data.unaids.org/pub/EPISlides/2007/ 2007_epiupdate_en.pdf.
    • 15. Urassa M, Todd J, Boerma JT, Hayes R, Isingo R: Male circumcision and susceptibility to HIV infection among men in Tanzania. Aids 1997, 11:73-9.
    • 16. Nnko S, Washija R, Urassa M, Boerma JT: Dynamics of male circumcision practices in northwest Tanzania. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2001, 28:214-8.
    • 17. Westercamp N, Bailey RC: Acceptability of male circumcision for prevention of HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. AIDS Behaviour 2007, 11(3):341-55.
    • 18. Women's HIV Prevention Tracking Project (WHiPT): Making Medical Male Circumcision Work for Women. 2010 [http://www.avac.org/ht/d/sp/d/sp/i/ 306/pid/306].
    • 19. Nutley S, Walter I, Davies H: Promoting Evidence-based Practice: Models and Mechanisms From Cross-Sector Review. Research on Social Work Practice 2009, 19(5):552-559.
    • 20. South A: Designing and implementing a communications strategy: lessons learnt from HIV and Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Programme Consortia. Health Research Policy and Systems , This supplement.
    • 21. Shiffman J: A social explanation of the rise and fall of global health issues. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009, 87:608-613.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article