Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bowers , Christopher ,; Byrne , Will; Cowan , Benjamin ,; Creed , Chris; Hendley , Robert ,; Beale , Russell (2011)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Conference object
Subjects: mixed-initiative annotation, [ INFO ] Computer Science [cs], multimedia annotation, QA75, QA76, Task interruption
Part 1: Long and Short Papers; International audience; In a cooperative mixed-initiative system, timely and effective dialogue between the system and user is important to ensure that both sides work towards producing the most effective results, and this is affected by how disruptive any interruptions are as the user completes their primary task. A disruptive interaction means the user may become irritated with the system, or might take longer to deal with the interruption and provide information that the system needs to continue. Disruption is influenced both by the nature of the interaction and when it takes place in the context of the user’s progress through their main task. We describe an experiment based on a prototype cooperative video annotation system designed to explore the impact of interruptions, in the form of questions posed by the system that the user must address. Our findings demonstrate a preference towards questions presented in context with the content of the video, rather than at the natural opportunities presented by transitions in the video. This differs from previous research which concentrates on interruptions in the form of notifications.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Adamczyk, P. D. & Bailey, B. P. If Not Now When? The Effects of Interruptions at Different Moments Within Task Execution. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '04. ACM (2004) 271-278.
    • 2. Allen, J.F. Mixed-Initiative Interaction. Intelligent Systems and their Applications, IEEE. 14, 5 (1999) 14-23.
    • 3. Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. & Carlis, J.V. Measuring the Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance in the User Interface. In IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2000) 757-762.
    • 4. Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A. & Carlis, J.V. The Effects of Interruptions on Task Performance, Annoyance, and Anxiety in the User Interface. In Proc. of INTERACT 2001 (2001) 593 - 601.
    • 5. Bailey, B. P. & Iqbal, S. T. Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management. ACM Trans. Comput.- Hum. Interact. 14, 4 (2008), 1-28.
    • 6. Creed, C., Lonsdale, P., Hendley, B. & Beale, R. Synergistic Annotation of Multimedia Content. In Proc of the 2010 Third International Conference on Advances in ComputerHuman Interactions, (2010) 205-208.
    • 7. Cutrell, E., Czerwinski, M. & Horvitz, E. Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance. In Proc. of Interact 2001 (2001) 263-269.
    • 8. Czerwinski, M., Cutrel, E. & Horvitz, E. Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance. OZCHI 2000 Conference Proceedings (2000) 356-361.
    • 9. Horvitz, E. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. In Proc. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1999) 159-166
    • 10. Horvitz, E., Kadie, C., Paek, T & Hovel, D. Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications. Comm. ACM, 46, 3 (2003) 52-59
    • 11. Iqbal, S. T. & Bailey, B. P. Effects of Intelligent Notification Management on Users and Their Tasks. In Proc. of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ,CHI '08 (2008) 93-102.
    • 12. Latorella, K. A. Effects of modality on interrupted flight deck performance: Implications for data link. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, Aerospace Systems, (1998) 87-91(5).
    • 13. Mark, G., Gudith, D. & Klocke, U. The Cost of Interrupted Work: More Speed and Stress. In Proc. of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ,CHI '08 (2008) 107-110.
    • 14. Mcfarlane, D. C. Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-computer Interaction. In Proc. of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'99), IOS Press (1999) 295-303.
    • 15. Miyata, Y. & Norman, D. A. Psychological Issues in Support of Multiple Activities. In User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (1986) 265-284.
    • 16. Monk, C. A. & Boehm-Davis, D. A. The Attentional Costs of Interrupting Task Performance at Various Stages. In Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (2002) 1824-1828.
    • 17. Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E. & Evans, J. E. Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 4 (2001) 763-797.
    • 18. Speier, C., Valacich, J. S. & Vessey, I. The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences, 30, 2 (1999) 337-360.
    • 19. Zijlstra, F. R. H. & Roe, R. A. Temporal factors in mental work: Effects of interrupted activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72 (1999) 163-185.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | CASAM

Cite this article