Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Andrienko, G.; Andrienko, N.; Dykes, J.; Kraak, M. J.; Robinson, A.; Schumann, H. (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: GA, QA75
3D desktop-based virtual environments provide a means for displaying quantitative data in context. Data that is inherently spatial in three-dimensions may benefit from visual exploration and analysis in relation to the environment in which they were collected and to which they relate. We empirically evaluate how effectively and efficiently such data can be visually analyzed in relation to location and landform in 3D versus 2D visualizations. In two experiments, participants performed visual analysis tasks in 2D and 3D visualizations and reported insights and their confidence in them. The results showed only small differences between the 2D and 3D visualizations in the performance measures that we evaluated: task completion time, confidence, complexity, and insight plausibility. However, we found differences for different data sets and settings suggesting that 3D visualizations, or 2D representations respectively, may be more or less useful for particular data sets and contexts.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Demsar, U., Dransch, D., Dykes, J., Fabrikant, S. I., Jern, M., Kraak, M.-J., Schumann, H., and Tominski, C. 2010. "Space, time and visual analytics." International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (10): 1577-1600.
    • Andrienko, N., and Andrienko, G. 2006. Exploratory Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Data: A Systematic Approach. Berlin: Springer.
    • Bartoschek, T., and Schönig, J. 2008. "Trends und Potenziale von virtuellen Globen in Schule, Lehramtsausbildung und Wissenschaft." GIS.Science, 2008 (4): 28-31.
    • Bleisch, S. 2011. "Towards appropriate representations of quantitative data in virtual environments." Cartographica, 46 (4): 252-261. doi:10.3138/carto.46.4.252.
    • Bleisch, S., Dykes, J., and Nebiker, S. 2008. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Representing Numeric Information Through Abstract Graphics in 3D Desktop Virtual Environments." The Cartographic Journal, 45 (3): 216-226. doi:10.1179/000870408X311404.
    • Bleisch, S., and Nebiker, S. 2008. "Connected 2D and 3D visualizations for the interactive exploration of spatial information." Paper presented at the XXIst ISPRS Congress, Beijing, China, July 3-11.
    • Butler, D. 2006. "Virtual globes: the web-wide world." Nature, 439 (7078): 776-778.
    • Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D., and Roberts, J. C. 2011. "Visual comparison for information visualization." Information Visualization, 10 (4): 289-309. doi:10.1177/1473871611416549.
    • Keim, D. A. 2002. "Information Visualization and Visual Data Mining." IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 7 (1): 100-107.
    • Lam, H., Bertini, E., Isenberg, P., Plaisant, C., and Carpendale, S. 2011. "Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios." IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18 (9): 1520- 1536. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.279.
    • MacEachren, A. M., and Kraak, M.-J. 2001. "Research Challenges in Geovisualization." Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (1): 3-12.
    • Marsh, S. L. 2007. "Using and Evaluating HCI Techniques in Geovisualization: Applying Standard and Adapted Methods in Research and Education." PhD diss., City University London.
    • Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
    • North, C. 2006. "Toward Measuring Visualization Insight." IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26 (3): 6-9.
    • Patterson, T. C. 2007. "Google Earth as a (Not Just) Geography Education Tool." Journal of Geography, 106 (4): 145-152.
    • Rester, M., Pohl, M., Wiltner, S., Hinum, K., Miksch, S., Popow, C., and Ohmann, S. 2007. "Evaluating an InfoVis Technique Using Insight Reports." In Information Visualization, 2007, 11th International Conference IV '07, edited by E. Banissi et al., 693-700. Zürich, Switzerland: IEEE Computer Society.
    • Slingsby, A., Dykes, J., and Wood, J. 2008. "A Guide to Getting your Data into Google Earth." Accessed April 14. http://www.willisresearchnetwork.com/Lists/WRN News/Attachments/8/An introduction to Getting your Data in Google Earth2.pdf
    • Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., and Howard, H. H. 2009. Thematic cartography and geovisualization. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    • Tobon, C. 2005. "Evaluating Geographic Visualization Tools and Methods: An Approach and Experiment Based upon User Tasks." In Exploring Geovisualization, edited by J. Dykes, A. M. MacEachren and M.-J. Kraak, 645-666. Oxford: Elsevier.
    • Ware, C. 2008. Visual Thinking for Design. Burlington: Elsevier Inc.
    • Ware, C., and Plumlee, M. 2005. "3D Geovisualization and the Structure of Visual Space." In Exploring Geovisualization, edited by J. Dykes, A. M. MacEachren and M.-J. Kraak, 567-576. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article