Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Font, J.; Pasadas del Amo, S.; Smith, G. (2016)
Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW10

Classified by OpenAIRE into

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
    • Barrett, G., Wyman, M., & Schattan, V. (2012). Assessing the policy impacts of DCE: Comparing engagement in the health policy processes of Brazil and Canada. In T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Weisner, & M. Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion. Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Boulding, C. & Wampler, B. (2009). Voice, votes and resources: Evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Development, 38 (1), 125-135.
    • Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Font, J., Della Porta, D. & Sintomer, Y. (2012). Presentation: Methodological challenges in participation research. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70 (E2), 9-18.
    • Font, J., della Porta, D., & Sintomer, Y. (2014). Participatory democracy in Southern Europe: causes, characteristics and consequences. London, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield International.
    • Font, J., Smith, G., Galais, C., & Alarcon, P. (2016, March). Cherry-picking participation: explaining the fate of proposals from participatory processes. Paper Presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Brighton.
    • Fournier, P., van der Kolk, H., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., & Rose, J.. (2011). When citizens decide. Lessons from Citizens Assemblies on electoral reforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fung, A. (2001). Accountable autonomy: toward empowered deliberation in Chicago schools and policing. Politics & Society, 29, 73-103.
    • Galais, C., Font, J., Alarcon, P., & Sesma, D. (2012). Methodological challenges for the large N study of local participatory experiences: Combining methods 65-87.
    • Grönlund, K., Setala, M., & Herne, K. (2010). Deliberation and civic virtue: Lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 95-117.
    • Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: part 2: Citizens' Perspectives. Public Administration, 79, 445-455.
    • Mazeaud, A., Sa Vilas, M. H., & Berthomé, G. K. (2012). Penser les effets de la participation sur l'action publique à partir de ses impensés. Participations, 1, 6-29.
    • Olken, B. (2010). Direct democracy and local public goods: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Political Science Review, 104(2), 243- 267.
    • Ryan, M. & Smith, G. (2012). Towards a Comparative Analysis of Democratic Innovations: Lessons from a small-N fs-QCA of Participatory Budgeting. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70(E2), 88-95.
    • Sintomer, Y. & del Pino, E. (2014). The national and regional contexts of participatory experiences. In J. Font, D. della Porta, & Y. Sintomer (Eds.), Participatory democracy in Southern Europe: Causes, characteristics and consequences (pp. 21-36). London, United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield International.
    • Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Smith, G., Richards, R. C., & Gastil, J. (2015).The potential of participedia as a crowdsourcing tool for comparative analysis of democratic innovations. Policy and Internet, 7(2), 243-262.
    • Touchton, M. & Wampler, B. (2014). Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies, 47(10), 1442-1469.
    • Warren, M. E. (2009). Governance-driven democratisation. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3-13.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article