Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hosseini, Mahmoud; Shahri, Alimohammad; Phalp, Keith T.; Ali, Raian (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
The improvement and success of socio-technical systems depend on the joint optimisation of both the social and the technical parts. Improving the social part of a socio-technical system is a meticulous task, as social requirements are diverse and dynamic, and they usually evolve with time and context. Information transparency (henceforth, transparency) is one of the social requirements that can affect the overall attitude of the stakeholders present within a socio-technical system, and influence their other social requirements such as privacy, trust, collaboration and non-bias. In this paper, we advocate the need to engineer transparency as a first class requirement, propose a baseline model for transparency and show how this model can be a starting point for the analysis of transparency requirements of different stakeholders. We showcase our on-going research in the modelling and analysis of transparency as a requirement, discuss some of the challenges of transparency requirements elicitation, and present our future work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] G. Ropohl, “Philosophy of socio-technical systems,” Techne´: Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 186-194, 1999.
    • [2] A. Van Lamsweerde, “Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour,” in Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 2001, pp. 249-262.
    • [3] R. S. Aguilar-Saven, “Business process modelling: Review and framework,” International Journal of production economics, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 129-149, 2004.
    • [4] I. Altman, The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. ERIC, 1975.
    • [5] L. Liu, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos, “Security and privacy requirements analysis within a social setting,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International RE Conference, 2003, pp. 151-161.
    • [6] R. Islam, “Does more transparency go along with better governance?” Economics & Politics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121-167, 2006.
    • [7] F. Emery, Characteristics of sociotechnical systems. Tavistock Institute, 1959.
    • [8] G. McGivern and M. Fischer, “Medical regulation, spectacular transparency and the blame business,” Journal of health organization and management, vol. 24, no. 6, 2010.
    • [9] G. McGivern and M. D. Fischer, “Reactivity and reactions to regulatory transparency in medicine, psychotherapy and counselling,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 74, no. 3, 2012.
    • [10] M. D. Fischer and E. Ferlie, “Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 30-49, 2013.
    • [11] J. C. S. do Prado Leite and C. Cappelli, “Software transparency,” Business & Information Systems Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 127- 139, 2010.
    • [12] E. Yu, P. Giorgini, N. Maiden, and J. Mylopoulos, Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering: An Introduction. MIT Press, 2011.
    • [13] M. Turilli and L. Floridi, “The ethics of information transparency,” Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 105-112, 2009.
    • [14] C. Ball, “What is transparency?” Public Integrity, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 293-308, 2009.
    • [15] D. Hess, “Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency,” Business Ethics Quarterly, pp. 453-476, 2007.
    • [16] B. R. Rawlins, “Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust,” All Faculty Publications, 2008.
    • [17] J. R. Hollyer, B. P. Rosendorff, and J. R. Vreeland, “Democracy and transparency,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 73, no. 04, pp. 1191-1205, 2011.
    • [18] J. C. S. Do Prado Leite and C. Cappelli, “Exploring i* characteristics that support software transparency.” in iStar, 2008, pp. 51-54.
    • [19] Y.-C. Tu, C. Thomborson, and E. Tempero, “Illusions and perceptions of transparency in software engineering,” in Proceedings of the 18th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference. IEEE, 2011, pp. 365-372.
    • [20] M. Serrano and J. Sampaio do Prado Leite, “Capturing transparencyrelated requirements patterns through argumentation,” in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Requirements Patterns (RePa). IEEE, 2011, pp. 32-41.
    • [21] C. Cappelli, J. Sampaio do Prado Leite, and A. d. P. A. Oliveira, “Exploring business process transparency concepts,” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International RE Conference, 2007, pp. 389-390.
    • [22] J. Castro, M. Kolp, and J. Mylopoulos, “Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the tropos project,” Information systems, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 365-389, 2002.
    • [23] P. Bresciani, A. Perini, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, and J. Mylopoulos, “Tropos: An agent-oriented software development methodology,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 203-236, 2004.
    • [24] A. Stone and P. Sawyer, “Identifying tacit knowledge-based requirements,” IEE Proceedings-Software, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 211-218, 2006.
    • [25] R. Ali, C. Solis, I. Omoronyia, M. Salehie, and B. Nuseibeh, “Social adaptation: when software gives users a voice,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, June 2012, pp. 28-30.
    • [26] A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseibeh, L. Finkelstein, and M. Goedicke, “Viewpoints: A framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 31-57, 1992.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article