LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Spencer, Nick; Hilton, Kevin (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: W200
“I’m not saying it’s a good quality to have, but my observation is that good designers are never happy, they’re never satisfied, never content” (Adrian Stokes, quoted in Spencer, 2008, p. 145). It seems self-evident that designers, whose raison d’être is to initiate change in man-made things (Jones, 1970), devising courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred ones (Simon, 1969), will be dissatisfied, at some level, with the way they experience the material world. However, recent research (Spencer, 2008) suggests that expert designers deliberately enhance the pressure and stress of the design situation – stimulating dissatisfaction. By stimulating the experience of dissatisfaction their imaginative and investigative action is given urgency, focus and purpose as they pursue excellence and attempt to unfold from their own view of the world to empathise with a broad project community. This discursive paper highlights the need for a developed understanding of the reflective practitioner model to inform the post-rationalist generation of design methods. This paper: reviews critical literature about the experience of designing; discusses the role of dissatisfaction within the practise of design; and presents a research project that aims to evaluate the value of stimulated dissatisfaction for the purpose of supporting practitioners’ empathic appreciation in early design direction generation. This paper argues that the reflective practitioner model of the designer must address the stimulation of dissatisfaction as a condition of creative and explorative design practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexander, C. (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Bousbaci, R. (2008) '”Models of Man” in design thinking: The “Bounded Rationality” episode', DesignStudies, Vol 24 (4).
    • Cross, N. (1981) 'The coming of the post-industrial design', Design Studies, Vol 2 (1).
    • Cross, N. (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
    • Cross, N. & Clayburn Cross, A. (1996) 'Winning by design: the methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer', Design Studies, 17 (1), pp. 91-107.
    • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
    • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992) Flow. The psychology of happiness. London: Rider.
    • Darke, J. (1979) 'The primary generator and the design process', Design Studies, 1(1), pp36-44.
    • Descartes, R. (1637) Discourse on Method.
    • Davies, R. & Talbot, R.J. (1987) 'Experiencing ideas: identity, insight and the imago', Design Studies, 8 (1), pp. 17-25.
    • Dominguez, P. (2008) IDEO's 7 Rules of Brainstorming. Available at: http://www.greenbusinessinnovators.com/7-rules-of-brainstorming-from-ideo (Accessed: 1 September 2009).
    • Dorst, K. (1997) Describing Design: A Comparison of Paradigms. PhD thesis.
    • Dorst, K. (2003) 'The problem of design problems', Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium 6. Cross, N. & Edmonds, E. (eds.) University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, 17-19 November 2003.
    • English, S. (2006) 'Design thinking - Value innovation - Deductive reason and the designers choice', Design Research Society Conference, Lisbon 1-4 November.
    • Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003) Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, pp 233-240.
    • Hillier, B., Musgrove, J. & O'Sullivan, P. (1972) 'Knowledge and Design', in Mitchell, W.J. (ed). Environmental Design: Research and Practice. Los Angeles: University of California, pp245-264.
    • Hilton, K. H. (2002) Stimulating the Practice of Opportunity Identification. 'Shared Visions'. ADC-LTSN Conference, Brighton.
    • Hilton, K. H. and Henderson, K. (2008) Developing Criminal Personas for Designers.
    • British Society of Criminology Journal, Vol.8.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article