Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Angeli, Adriana; Davidoff, Jules B.; Valentine, Tim (2008)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Four experiments with faces support the original interpretation of categorical perception (CP) as only present for familiar categories. Unlike in the results of Levin and Beale (2000), no evidence is found for face identity CP with unfamiliar faces. Novel face identities were shown to be capable of encoding for immediate sorting purposes but the representations utilized do not have the format of perceptual categories. One possibility explored was that a choice of a distinctive face as an end-point in a morphed continuum can spuriously produce effects that resemble CP. Such morphed continua provided unequal psychological responses to equal physical steps though much more so in a better likeness paradigm than for forced-choice recognition. Thus, researchers doing almost the same experiments may produce very different results and come to radically different conclusions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Angeli, A. (2004).The categorical perception of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis: University of London.
    • Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory & Cognition, 12, 219 - 228.
    • Beale, J. M., & Keil, F. C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217 - 239.
    • Bimler, D., & Kirkland, J. (2001). Categorical perception of facial expression: Evidence from multidimensional scaling. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 633 - 658.
    • Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., & Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 115 - 129.
    • Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., & Dench, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 119 - 141.
    • Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Newman, C., & Burton, A. M. (2001). Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 207- 218.
    • Bruce, V., & Valentine, T. (1985). Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 363 - 383.
    • Bu¨ lthoff, I., & Newell, F. N. (2004). Categorical perception of sex occurs in familiar but not unfamiliar faces. Visual Cognition, 11, 823 - 855.
    • Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Perrett, D. I., Etcoff, N. L., & Rowland, D. (1996). Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions. Visual Cognition, 3, 81 - 117.
    • Campanella, S., Chrysochoos, A., & Bruyer, R. (2001). Categorical perception of facial gender information: Behavioural evidence and the face-space metaphor. Visual Cognition, 8, 237 - 262.
    • Campanella, S., Hanoteau, C., Seron, X., Joassin, F., & Bruyer, R. (2003). Categorical perception of unfamiliar facial identities, the face-space metaphor, and the morphing technique. Visual Cognition, 10, 129 - 156.
    • Campbell, R., & de Haan, E. H. F. (1998). Repetition priming for face speech images: Speech-reading primes face identification. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 309 - 323.
    • Campbell, R., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., Wallace, S. B., & Benson, P. J. (1997). Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers? Proceedings of the Royal Society London, 264, 1429 - 1434.
    • Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. (2005). Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 97 - 116.
    • de Gelder, B., Teunisse, J. P., & Benson, P. J. (1997). Categorical perception of facial expressions: Categories and their internal structure. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 1 - 23.
    • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
    • Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431 - 439.
    • Etcoff, N. L., & Magee, J. J. (1992). Categorical perception of facial expression. Cognition, 44, 227 - 240.
    • Franklin, A., & Davies, I. R. L. (2004). New evidence for infant colour categories British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 349 - 377.
    • Goldstone, R. L. (1994a). Influences of categorisation on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178 - 200.
    • Goldstone, R. L. (1994b). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52, 125 - 157.
    • Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78, 27 - 43.
    • Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kircher, T. T. J., Senior, C., Phillips, M. L., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Benson, P. J., Bullmore, E. T., et al. (2001). Recognizing one's own face. Cognition, 78, B1 - B15.
    • Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. L. (2002). Categorical perception of race. Perception, 31, 567 - 578.
    • Levin, D. T., & Beale, J. M. (2000). Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 386 - 401.
    • Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358 - 368.
    • Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 732 - 753.
    • Macmillan, N. A. (1987). Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 53 - 85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., & Creelman, C. D. (1977). The psychophysics of categorical perception. Psychological Review, 84, 452 - 471.
    • McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 573 - 599.
    • O¨ zgen, E., & Davies, I. R. L. (2002). Acquisition of categorical color perception: A perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 477 - 493.
    • Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning. 3, 406 - 417.
    • Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., & Braisby, N. (1999). Similarity and categorisation: Neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorisation tasks. Cognition, 71, 1 - 42.
    • Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 369 - 398.
    • Roberts, A. D., & Bruce, V. (1989). Repetition priming of faces in a serial choice reaction time task. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 201 - 211.
    • Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Robaye, L., Pirenne, D., & Crommelinck, M. (2001). How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces? A PET study of face categorical perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1019 - 1034.
    • Tanaka, J. W., Giles, M., Kremen, S., & Simon, V. (1998). Mapping attractor fields in face space: The atypicality bias in face recognition. Cognition, 68, 199 - 220.
    • Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161 - 204.
    • Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525 - 536.
    • Viviani, P., Binda, P., & Borsato, T. (2007). Categorical perception of newly learned faces. Visual Cognition, 15, 420 - 467.
    • Young, A. W., Rowland, D., Calder, A. J., Etcoff, N. L., Seth, A., & Perrett, D. I. (1997). Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition. Cognition, 63, 271 - 313.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article