LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Essa, Laika
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: eye diseases, sense organs, genetic structures
Dry eye disease is a common clinical condition whose aetiology and management challenges clinicians and researchers alike. Practitioners have a number of dry eye tests available to clinically assess dry eye disease, in order to treat their patients effectively and successfully. This thesis set out to determine the most relevant and successful key tests for dry eye disease diagnosis/ management. There has been very little research on determining the most effective treatment options for these patients; therefore a randomised controlled study was conducted in order to see how different artificial treatments perform compared to each other, whether the preferred treatment could have been predicted from their ocular clinical assessment, and if the preferred treatment subjectively related to the greatest improvement in ocular physiology and tear film stability. This research has found: 1. From the plethora of ocular the tear tests available to utilise in clinical practice, the tear stability tests as measured by the non-invasive tear break (NITBUT) up time and invasive tear break up time (NaFL TBUT) are strongly correlated. The tear volume tests are also related as measured by the phenol red thread (PRT) and tear meniscus height (TMH). Lid Parallel Conjunctival Folds (LIPCOF) and conjunctival staining are significantly correlated to one another. Symptomology and osmolarity were also found to be important tests in order to assess for dry eye. 2. Artificial tear supplements do work for ocular comfort, as well as the ocular surface as observed by conjunctival staining and the reduction LIPCOF. There is no strong evidence of one type of artificial tear supplement being more effective than others, and the data suggest that these improvements are more due to the time than the specific drops. 3. When trying to predict patient preference for artificial tears from baseline measurements, the individual category of artificial tear supplements appeared to have an improvement in at least 1 tear metric. Undoubtedly, from the study the patients preferred artificial tear supplements’ were rated much higher than the other three drops used in the study and their subjective responses were statistically significant than the signs. 4. Patients are also willing to pay for a community dry eye service in their area of £17. In conclusion, the dry eye tests conducted in the study correlate with one another and with the symptoms reported by the patient. Artificial tears do make a difference objectively as well as subjectively. There is no optimum artificial treatment for dry eye, however regular consistent use of artificial eye drops will improve the ocular surface.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • McCulley JP, Shine WE. Eyelid disorders: the meibomian gland, blepharitis, and contact lenses. Eye and Contact Lens, 2003; 29:S93-95, discussion S115-8, S192- 194.
    • http://www.refractiveeyecare.com/2012/10/the-changing-landscape-of-dry-eyediagnosis/ 2012.
    • McDonald M. Latest trends in dry eye treatments (advertorial). Cornea Society News, 2007; 3:7-8.
    • McGinnigle S, Eperjesi F, Naroos S. Optometric management of dry eye. Optometry Today, 2011; 45-48.
    • McMonnies CW, Ho A. Marginal dry eye diagnosis: history versus biomicroscopy. The Preocular Tear Film in Health, Disease, and Contact Lens Wear. Lubbuck, TX: Dry Eye Institute, 1986; 32-40.
    • McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 1987; 58:296-301.
    • McMonnies CW. Key questions in a dry eye history. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 1986; 57: 512 - 517.
    • Journal of the American Optometric Association, 1987; 58:588-591.
    • McNamara NA, Polse KA, Fukunaga SA, Maebori JS, Suzuki RM. Soft lens extended wear affects epithelial barrier function. Ophthalmology, 1998; 105:2330-2335.
    • Meller D, Tseng SC. Conjunctivochalasis: literature review and possible pathophysiology. Survey of ophthalmology, 1998; 43:225-232.
    • Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, Gilbert DJ. A non-invasive instrument for clinical assessment of the pre-corneal tear film stability. Current eye research, 1985; 4:1-7.
    • Mengher LS, Bron AJ, Tonge SR, Gilbert DJ. Effect of fluorescein instillation on the pre-corneal tear film stability. Current eye research, 1985; 4:9-12.
    • Mengher LS, Pandher KS, Bron AJ, Davey CC. Effect of sodium hyaluronate (0.1%) on break-up time (NIBUT) in patients with dry eyes. British journal of ophthalmology, 1986; 70:442-447.
    • Mertzanis P, Abetz L, Rajagopalan K, Espindle D, Chalmers R, Snyder C, Caffery B, Begley C. The relative burden of dry eye in patients' lives: comparisons to a US normative sample. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2005; 46:46-50.
    • Miljanovic B, Dana MR, Sullivan DA, Schaumberg DA. Prevalence and risk factors for dry eye syndrome among older men in the United States. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2007; 48:4293.
    • Archives of ophthalmology, 2010; 128:94-101.
    • Norn MS. External eye: Methods of examination. Copenhagen: Scriptor.1974; 76-78.
    • Norn MS. Preoperative protection of cornea and conjunctiva. Acta ophthalmologica, 1981; 59:587-594.
    • Norn MS. Semi quantitative interference study of fatty layer of pre corneal film. Acta ophthalmologica, 1979; 57:766-774.
    • Norn MS. Tear film break-up time: a review. The Preocular Tear Film: In Health, Disease and Contact Lens Wear, 1986; 3:52-56.
    • Norn MS: Lissamine green. Vital staining of the cornea and conjunctiva. Acta Ophthalmologica, 1973; 51:483-91.
    • O'Hare R. LOCSU welcomes NHS chief's recommendations. Optometry Today, 2014; 54:6.
    • Optometry Today, 2005; 47-51.
    • Oden NL, Lilienfeld DE, Lemp MA, Nelson JD, Ederer F. Sensitivity and specificity of a screening questionnaire for dry eye. In Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye Syndromes 2, 1998; 807-820. Springer US.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article