Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Shen, Yuan; Cornford, Dan; Opper, Manfred
Publisher: IEEE
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
In this paper, we present a framework for Bayesian inference in continuous-time diffusion processes. The new method is directly related to the recently proposed variational Gaussian Process approximation (VGPA) approach to Bayesian smoothing of partially observed diffusions. By adopting a basis function expansion (BF-VGPA), both the time-dependent control parameters of the approximate GP process and its moment equations are projected onto a lower-dimensional subspace. This allows us both to reduce the computational complexity and to eliminate the time discretisation used in the previous algorithm. The new algorithm is tested on an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Our preliminary results show that BF-VGPA algorithm provides a reasonably accurate state estimation using a small number of basis functions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] J. Derber, “A variational continuous assimilation technique,” Mon. Wea. Rev., vol. 117, pp. 2437-2446, 1989.
    • [2] A. Apte, M. Hairer, A. M. Stuart, and J. Voss, “Sampling the posterior: An approach to non-Gaussian data assimilation,” Physica. D, vol. 230, pp. 50-64, 2007.
    • [3] G. Evensen, “An ensemble Kalman smoother for nonlinear dynamics,” Mon. Wea. Rev., vol. 128, pp. 1852- 1867, 2000.
    • [4] C. Archambeau, M. Opper, Y. Shen, D. Cornford, and J. Shawe-Tayler, “Variational inference for diffusion processes,” in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Roweis, Eds. 2008, vol. 20, pp. 17-24, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
    • [5] Y. Cao, J. Zhu, I. M. Navon, and Z. Luo, “A reducedorder approach to four-dimensional variational data assimilation using proper orthogonal decomposition,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Flu., vol. 53, pp. 1571-1583, 2007.
    • [6] B. F. Farrell and P. J. Ioannou, “State estimation using a reduced-order kalman filter,” J. Atmos. Sci., vol. 58, pp. 3666-3680, 2001.
    • [7] G. Q. Roberts, A. Beskos, O. Papaspiliopoulous, and P. Fearnhead, “Exact and computationally efficient likelihood-based estimation for discretely observed diffusion processes,” J. R. Statist. Soc. B, vol. 68, pp. 333- 382, 2006.
    • [8] P. Fearnhead, O. Papaspiliopoulous, and G. O. Roberts, “Particle filters for partially observed diffusions,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B, vol. 70, pp. 755-777, 2008.
    • [9] P. E. Klo¨ den and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Spinger, Berlin, 1992.
    • [10] A. M. Stuart, J. Voss, and P. Winberg, “Conditional path sampling of SDEs and the langevin MCMC method,” Comm. Math. Sci., vol. 2, pp. 685-697, 2004.
    • [11] J. Honerkamp, Stochastic Dynamical Systems, VCH, Weinheim, 1994.
    • [12] C. Archambeau, D. Cornford, M. Opper, and J. ShaweTayler, “Gaussian Process approximations of stochastic differential equations,” J. Mach. Learn. Res. Workshop and Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 1-16, 2007.
    • [13] S. Kullbackand and R. A. Leibler, “On information and sufficiency,” Ann. Math. Stat., vol. 22, pp. 79-86, 1951.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article