Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mohangoo, Ashna D.; Blondel, B?atrice; Gissler, Mika; Velebil, Petr; Macfarlane, Alison; Zeitlin, Jennifer (2013)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Global Health, Social Epidemiology, Research Article, Pregnancy, Medicine, Growth Retardation, Miscarriage and Stillbirth, Child Health, Pediatric Epidemiology, Q, Epidemiology, Epidemiological Methods, R, Neonatology, RG, Science, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Pregnancy Complications, Public Health
Background: Fetal and neonatal mortality rates are essential indicators of population health, but variations in recording of births and deaths at the limits of viability compromises international comparisons. The World Health Organization recommends comparing rates after exclusion of births with a birth weight less than 1000 grams, but many analyses of perinatal outcomes are based on gestational age. We compared the effects of using a 1000-gram birth weight or a 28-week gestational age threshold on reported rates of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe.\ud \ud Methods: Aggregated data from 2004 on births and deaths tabulated by birth weight and gestational age from 29 European countries/regions participating in the Euro-Peristat project were used to compute fetal and neonatal mortality rates using cut-offs of 1000-grams and 28-weeks (2.8 million total births). We measured differences in rates between and within countries using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and 95% confidence intervals, respectively.\ud \ud Principal Findings: For fetal mortality, rates based on gestational age were significantly higher than those based on birth weight (p,0.001), although these differences varied between countries. The use of a 1000-gram threshold included 8823 fetal deaths compared with 9535 using a 28-week threshold (difference of 712). In contrast, the choice of a cut-off made little difference for comparisons of neonatal deaths (difference of 16). Neonatal mortality rates differed minimally, by under 0.1 per 1000 in most countries (p = 0.370). Country rankings were comparable with both thresholds.\ud \ud Conclusions: Neonatal mortality rates were not affected by the choice of a threshold. However, the use of a 1000-gram threshold underestimated the health burden of fetal deaths. This may in part reflect the exclusion of growth restricted fetuses. In high-income countries with a good measure of gestational age, using a 28-week threshold may provide additional valuable information about fetal deaths occurring in the third trimester.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Joseph KS, Liu S, Rouleau J, Lisonkova S, Hutcheon JA, et al. (2012) Influence ofdefinition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study. BMJ 344: e746 doi:10.1136/bmj.e746.
    • 2. Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Mohangoo AD, Cuttini M, Macfarlane A, et al. (2012) Rapid response to: Influence of definition based versus pragmatic birth registration on international comparisons of perinatal and infant mortality: population based retrospective study. BMJ.
    • 3. Mohangoo AD, Buitendijk SE, Szamotulska K, Chalmers J, Irgens LM, et al. (2011) Gestational age patterns of fetal and neonatal mortality in Europe: results from the Euro-Peristat project. PloS one 6(11): e24727.
    • 4. Frøen JF, Gordijn SJ, Abdel-Aleem H, Bergsjø P, Betran A, et al. (2009) Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - issues in data collection for stillbirths. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9: 58.
    • 5. Gissler M, Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, Chalmers J, Macfarlane A, et al. (2010) Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project. Inform Health Soc Care 35(2): 64-79.
    • 6. EURO-PERISTAT project in collaboration with SCPE, EUROCAT and EURONEOSTAT (2008) Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies in 2004. European Perinatal Health Report. Available at www. europeristat.com.
    • 7. World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classificationof Diseases and Related Health Problems - Instruction Manual. 2. In: WHO, ed. Geneva: WHO; 2004: http: //www.who.int/classifications/icd/ icdonlineversions/en/index.html. Accessed http: //www.who.int/ classifications/icd/icdonlineversions/en/index.html accessed 25.07.2011.
    • 8. Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, Duke W, Erwich JJ, et al. (2011) Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 377(9778): 1703-1717.
    • 9. Kramer MS, McLean FH, Boyd ME, Usher RH (1988) The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA. 260(22): 3306-8.
    • 10. Ananth CV (2007) Menstrual versus clinical estimate of gestational age dating in the United States: temporal trends and variability in indices of perinatal outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 21 Suppl 2: 22-30.
    • 11. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, Cousens S, Kumar R, et al. (2011) Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet. 377(9775): 1448-1463.
    • 12. Larroque B, Ancel PY, Marret S, Marchand L, Andre´ M, et al. (2008) Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 371(9615): 813-820.
    • 13. Vanhaesebrouck P, Allegaert K, Bottu J, Debauche C, Devlieger H, et al. (2004) The EPIBEL study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for extremely preterm infants in Belgium. Pediatrics. 114(3): 663-675.
    • 14. Moore T, Hennessy EM, Myles J, Johnson SJ, Draper ES, et al. (2012) Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies.BMJ. 4;345: e7961. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7961.
    • 15. EXPRESS Group (2010) Incidence of and risk factors for neonatal morbidity after active perinatal care: extremely preterm infants study in Sweden ( E X P R E S S ) . Ac ta P a e d i a tr . 9 9 ( 7 ) : 9 7 8 - 9 2 . d o i : 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 / j . 1 6 5 1 - 2227.2010.01846.x. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
    • 16. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR (2000). Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 343(6): 378-384.
    • 17. Graafmans WC, Richardus JH, Borsboom GJ, Bakketeig L, Langhoff-Roos J, et al. (2002) Birth weight and perinatal mortality: a comparison of ''optimal'' birth weight in seven Western European countries. Epidemiology. 13(5): 569- 574.
    • 18. Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G (2003) Perinatal health indicators for Europe: an introduction to the PERISTAT project. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 111 Suppl 1: S1-4.
    • 19. Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, Alexander S, Barros H, et al. (2003) PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 13(3 Suppl): 29-37.
    • 20. Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, Alexander S, Barros H, et al. (2003) Selecting an indicator set for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe: criteria, methods and results from the PERISTAT project. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 111 Suppl 1: S5-S14.
    • 21. Kollee LA, Cuttini M, Delmas D, Papiernik E, den Ouden AL, et al. (2009) Obstetric interventions for babies born before 28 weeks of gestation in Europe: results of the MOSAIC study. Bjog 116(11): 1481-91. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
    • 22. Langhoff-Roos J, Kesmodel U, Jacobsson B, Rasmussen S, Vogel I (2006) Spontaneous preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk in Denmark: population based study. Bmj 332(7547): 937-9.
    • 23. Norman JE, Morris C, Chalmers J (2009) The effect of changing patterns of obstetric care in Scotland (1980-2004) on rates of preterm birth and its neonatal consequences: perinatal database study. PLoS medicine 6(9): e1000153.
    • 24. Schaaf JM, Mol BW, Abu-Hanna A, Ravelli AC (2011) Trends in preterm birth: singleton and multiple pregnancies in the Netherlands, 2000-2007. BJOG 118(10): 1196-204.
    • 25. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, et al. (2011) Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet. 377(9774): 1331-1340.
    • 26. Chard T (2001) Does the fetus lose weight in utero following fetal death: a study in preterm infants. BJOG 108(11): 1113-1115.
    • 27. Battin MR, McCowan LM, George-Haddad M, Thompson JM (2007) Fetal growth restriction and other factors associated with neonatal death in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 47(6): 457-63.
    • 28. Carayol M, Bucourt M, Cuesta J, Zeitlin J, Blondel B (2012) Neonatal mortality in Seine-Saint-Denis: Analysis of neonatal death certificates. J Gynecol Obstet Bio l Reprod (Paris). doi: pii:S0368-2315(12 )00335-3. 10.1016/ j.jgyn.2012.10.012. [Epub ahead of print].
    • 29. Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, Francis A, Tonks A (2005) Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ. 331(7525): 1113-7. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article