Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gong, Mengfeng; Simpson, Andrew; Koh, Lenny; Tan, Kim Hua (2018)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
There has been an increasing interest in the use of decision-making models to achieve sustainability goal in recent decades. However, a systematic review of performance metrics, which are an important element of decision-making models to evaluate the outcomes regarding firm’s economic, environmental and social performance, is lacking. This study provides critical reflections on the current state of literature and industry development regarding sustainable performance metrics and offers concrete suggestions to guide future research. This study contributes to existing studies by (1) exploring the interrelationship between sustainable triple-bottom performance in the decision making process; (2) integrating corporate governance mechanism into decision making process for sustainable consideration; and (3) conducting a comparison between academic theory and industry practice regarding the performance metrics proposed and employed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abdul, Z. and Ibrahim, S., 2002. Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2(4), pp.10-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700210447641.
    • Adhitya, A., Halim, I. and Srinivasan, R. 2011. Decision support for green supply chain operations by integrating dynamic simulation and LCA indicators: Diaper case study". Environmental Science and Technology, 45 (23), pp.10178-10185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es201763q.
    • Awudu, I. and Zhang, J.2012. Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16 (2), pp.1359-1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.10.016.
    • Bai, C. G. and Sarkis, J. 2014. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 19 (3), pp.275-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/Scm-12-2013-0441.
    • Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Wei, X. and Koh, L. 2012. Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17 (1), pp.78-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598541211212221.
    • Bear, S., Rahman, N. and Post, C., 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), pp.207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.
    • Campbell, J.L., 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp.946-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684.
    • Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), pp. 497-505. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296.
    • Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A. and Paquet, M. 2012. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), pp.37-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025.
    • Chen, R. H., Lin, Y. H. and Tseng, M. L. 2015. Multicriteria analysis of sustainable development indicators in the construction minerals industry in China. Resources Policy, 46, pp.123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.10.012.
    • Chin, M.K., Hambrick, D.C. and Treviño, L.K., 2013. Political ideologies of CEOs the influence of executives' values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), pp.197-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486984.
    • Taticchi, P., Garengo, P., Nudurupati, S. S., Tonelli, F. and Pasqualino, R. 2015. A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 53, pp.6473-6494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.939239.
    • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14, pp.207-222.
    • Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A. and Pittaway, L., 2005. Using knowledge within small and medium‐ sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), pp.257-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x
    • Tseng, S. C. and Hung, S. W. 2014. A strategic decision-making model considering the social costs of carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, pp.315-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.023
    • United Nations. Department of Economic. 2007. Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies. United Nations Publications.
    • Vachon, S. and Mao, Z. M. 2008. Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, pp.1552-1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.012.
    • Vahabzadeh, A. H., Asiaei, A. and Zailani, S. 2015. Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 103, pp.125-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.023.
    • van Hoek, R. and Johnson, M. 2010. Sustainability and energy efficiency: Research implications from an academic roundtable and two case examples. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 40, pp.148-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031011018064
    • Verghese, K. L., Horne, R. and Carre, A. 2010. PIQET: The design and development of an online streamlined LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, pp.608-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0193-2
    • Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 303-319. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088143
    • Wakefield, J (2016) Apple, Samsung and Sony face child labour claims, BBC News, [Online] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35311456 (accessed 06/04/2016)
    • Wang, H. F. and Hsu, H. W. 2010. Resolution of an uncertain closed-loop logistics model: An application to fuzzy linear programs with risk analysis". Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp.2148-2162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.009
    • Wu, Z. and Pagell, M. 2011. Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29, pp.577-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001.
    • Zhang, Z. H. and Awasthi, A. 2014. Modelling customer and technical requirements for sustainable supply chain planning. International Journal of Production Research, 52, pp.5131-5154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.899717
    • Zingales, L. 1998. Survival of the Fittest or the Fattest? Exit and Financing in the Trucking Industry. The Journal of Finance, 3, pp.905-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00039
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article