LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Village, Andrew (2012)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF636, BS, BF, BV
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ammerman, N. T. (1982). Operationalizing evangelicalism: An amendment. Sociological Analysis, 43(2), 170-172.
    • Bader, C., & Froese, P. (2005). Images of God: The effect of personal theologies on moral attitudes, political affiliation and religious behaviour. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1(Article 11).
    • Bassett, R. L., Mathewson, K., & Gailitis, A. (1993). Recognising the person in biblical interpretation: An empirical study. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 12(1), 38-46.
    • Bielo, J. S. (2009). Words upon the word: An ethnography of evangelical group bible study. New York: New York University Press.
    • Boone, K. C. (1989). The Bible tells them so: The discourse of Protestant fundamentalism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    • Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 412-418. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00241.x
    • Cottone, J., Drucker, P., & Javier, R. A. (2007). Predictors of moral reasoning: Components of executive functioning and aspects of religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(1), 37-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 5906.2007.00339.x
    • Cowan, D. A. (1989). An alternative to the dichotomous interpretation of Jung's psychological type functions: Developing more sensitive measurement technology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 459-471. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5303_4
    • Craig, C. L., Horsfall, T., & Francis, L. J. (2005). Psychological types of male evangelical missionary personnel training in England: A role for thinking type men? Pastoral Psychology, 53(5), 475-482. doi: 10.1007/s11089-005-2588-8
    • DeCoster, J., Iselin, A.-M. R., & Gallucci, M. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 349-366. doi: 10.1037/a0016956
    • Dyson, A. (1985). The bishop of Durham and all that. Modern Churchman, 27(3), 1- 2.
    • Francis, L. J. (2003). Psychological type and biblical hermeneutics: SIFT method of preaching. Rural Theology, 1(1), 13-23.
    • Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
    • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2000). Exploring Luke's Gospel: A guide to the Gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum / Mowbray.
    • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2001). Exploring Matthew's Gospel: A guide to the Gospel readings in the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum.
    • Francis, L. J., & Atkins, P. (2002). Exploring Mark's Gospel: An aid for readers and preachers using Year B of the Revised Common Lectionary. London: Continuum / Mowbray.
    • Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Butler, A. (2007). Psychological types of male Evangelical Anglican seminarians in England. Journal of Psychological Type, 67(2), 11-17.
    • Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Horsfall, T., & Ross, C. F. J. (2005). Psychological types of male and female Evangelical lay church leaders in England compared with United Kingdom population norms. Fieldwork in Religion, 1(1), 69-83.
    • Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Whinney, M., Tilley, D., & Slater, P. (2007). Psychological profiling of Anglican clergy in England: Employing Jungian typology to interpret diversity, strengths, and potential weaknesses in ministry.
    • International Journal of Practical Theology, 11(2), 266-284. doi:
    • 10.1515/IJPT.2007.17
    • Francis, L. J., Duncan, B., Craig, C. L., & Luffman, G. (2004). Type patterns among Anglican congregations in England. Journal of Adult Theological Education, 1(1), 66-77. doi: 10.1558/jate.1.1.65.36058
    • Francis, L. J., & Jones, S. H. (1998). Personality and Christian belief among adult churchgoers. Journal of Psychological Type, 47, 5-11.
    • Francis, L. J., & Louden, S. H. (2000). Mystical orientation and psychological type: A study among student and adult churchgoers. Transpersonal Psychology Review, 4(1), 36-42.
    • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., Duncan, B., Whinney, M., & Ross, C. (2010). Confirming the psychological type profile of Anglican clergymen in England: A ministry for intuitives. In B. Ruelas & V. BriseƱo (Eds.), Psychology of intuition (pp. 211-219). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Village, A. (2009). Psychological type and the pulpit: An empirical enquiry concerning preachers and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics. HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, 65 Art. #161(1 ), 7 pages.
    • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Wulff, K. (2011). Psychological type profile of clergywomen and clergymen serving in the Presbyterian Church (USA): Implications for strengths and weaknesses in ministry. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 192-211.
    • Francis, L. J., & Ross, F. J. (1997). The perceiving function and Christian spirituality: Distinguishing between sensing and intuition. Pastoral Sciences, 16(1), 93- 103.
    • Francis, L. J., & Village, A. (2008). Preaching with all our Souls. London: Continuum.
    • Funk, R. W. (2001). The Jesus Seminar and the quest. In M. W. Meyer & C. T. Hughes (Eds.), Jesus then & now: Images of Jesus in history and christology (pp. 130-139). Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International.
    • Funk, R. W. (Ed.). (1998). The acts of Jesus: The search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
    • Funk, R. W., & Hoover, R. W. (Eds.). (1993). The five Gospels: The search for the authentic words of Jesus: A new translation and commentary. New York: Macmillan.
    • Harrison, T. (1985). The Durham phenomenon. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
    • Hoffmann, J. P., & Bartkowski, J. P. (2008). Gender, religious tradition and biblical literalism. Social Forces, 86(3), 1245-1272.
    • Jelen, T. G. (1989a). Biblical literalism and inerrancy: Does the difference make a difference? Sociological Analysis, 49(4), 421-429.
    • Jelen, T. G. (Ed.). (1989b). Religion and political behavior in the United States. New York: Praeger.
    • Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. London: Routledge.
    • Kellstedt, L. A. (1989). The meaning and measurement of evangelicalism: Problems and prospects. In T. G. Jelen (Ed.), Religion and political behavior in the United States (pp. 3-22). New York: Praeger.
    • Kendall, E. (1998). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Step 1 manual supplement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    • Leege, D. C. (1989). Toward a mental measure of religiosity in research on religion and politics. In T. G. Jelen (Ed.), Religion and political behavior in the United States (pp. 46-63). New York & Wesport, CT: Praeger.
    • Marty, M. E. (1994). Literalism versus everything else: A continuing conflict. Bible Review, 10(1), 38-43, 50.
    • Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
    • Norusis, M. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics 19 statistical procedures companion. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
    • Powell, M. A. (2009). "Things that matter": Historical Jesus studies in the new millennium. Word & World, 29(2), 121-128.
    • Randall, K. (2005). Evangelicals etcetera: Conflict and conviction in the Church of England's parties. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Samuel, S. (2011). Education and religion: Individual, congregational, and cross-level interaction effects on biblical literalism. Social Science Research, 40(6), 1478- 1493. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.05.001
    • Smidt, C. (1989). Identifying Evangelical respondents: an analysis of "born-again" and bible questions used across different surveys. In T. Jelen (Ed.), Religion and Political Behavior in the United States (pp. 23-43). New York & Wesport, CT: Praeger.
    • Village, A. (2005a). Assessing belief about the Bible: A study among Anglican laity. Review of Religious Research, 46(3), 243-254.
    • Village, A. (2005c). Factors shaping biblical literalism: A study among Anglican laity. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 26(1), 29-38. doi: 10.1080/13617670500047566
    • Village, A. (2007a). The Bible and lay people: An empirical approach to ordinary hermeneutics. Aldershot & Burlington VT: Ashgate.
    • Village, A. (2007b). Feeling in and falling out: Sense of belonging and frequency of disagreeing among Anglican congregations. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 29, 268-288. doi: 10.1163/008467207X188865
    • Village, A. (2009). The influence of psychological type preferences on readers trying to imagine themselves in a New Testament healing story HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies 65 Art. # 162. (1), 6 pages.
    • Village, A. (2010a). English Anglicanism: Individual religious identities in an established church. Paper presented at the a conference of the International Society for Empirical Research in Theology: 'Religious Identity and National Heritage: Empirical-Theological Perspectives', Rome.
    • Village, A. (2010b). Psychological type and biblical interpretation among Anglican clergy in the UK. Journal of Empirical Theology, 23(2), 179-200. doi: 10.1163/157092510X527349
    • Village, A. (2011). Gifts differing? Psychological type among stipendiary and nonstipendiary Anglican clergy. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 230-250.
    • Village, A. (in press). The Charismatic imagination: Clergy reading Mark 9: 14-29. Biblical Interpretation.
    • Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2005). The relationship of psychological type preferences to biblical interpretation. Journal of Empirical Theology, 18(1), 74-89. doi: 10.1163/1570925054048929
    • Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2010). An anatomy of change: Profiling cohortdifference in beliefs and attitudes among Anglicans in England. Journal of Anglican Studies, 8(1), 59-81. doi: 10.1017/S1740355309990027
    • Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2011). The visibility of mission agencies in general and USPG in particular among recently ordained Anglican clergy: An empirical enquiry. Transformation, 28(2), 129-137. doi: 10.1177/0265378810396299
    • Village, A., Francis, L. J., & Craig, C. L. (2009). Church tradition and psychological type preferences among Anglicans in England. Journal of Anglican Studies, 7(1), 93-109. doi: 10.1017/S1740355309000187
    • Wilcox, C. (1989). The New Christian Right and the mobilization of the Evangelicals. In T. G. Jelen (Ed.), Religion and political behavior in the United States (pp. 139-156). New York & Wesport, CT: Praeger.
    • Wilcox, C. (1992). God's warriors: The Christian Right in twentieth-century America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    • Zigerell, L. J. Science knowledge and biblical literalism. Public Understanding of Science. doi: 10.1177/0963662510391723
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article