Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Edwards, John S.; Shaw, Duncan A.
Languages: English
Types: Article
In the IS literature, commitment is typically considered to involve organizational or managerial support for a system and not that of its users. This paper however reports on a field study involving 16 organizations that attempted to build user involvement in developing a knowledge management strategy by having them design it. Twenty-two IT-supported group workshops (involving 183 users) were run to develop action plans for better knowledge management that users would like to see implemented. Each workshop adopted the same problem structuring technique to assist group members develop a politically feasible action plan to which they were psychologically and emotionally dedicated. In addition to reviewing the problem structuring method, this paper provides qualitative insight into the factors a knowledge management strategy should have to encourage user commitment. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] F. Ackermann, C. Eden, SODA-journey making and mapping in practice, in: J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001, pp. 43-60.
    • [2] M. Alavi, D.E. Leidner, Review: knowledge management and knowledge management Systems: conceptual foundations and research issues, MIS Quarterly (25) 2001, pp. 107-136.
    • [3] M.G. Assad, The X-Y chart: a tool for systems designers, Information & Management (2) 1979, pp. 175-179.
    • [4] R. Battams, Knowledge management strategy at , Aston Business School. MBA Thesis. Aston University, Birmingham, 2002.
    • [5] B. Berelson, Content Analysis in Commmunicative Research, Free Press, New York, 1952.
    • [6] R.P. Bostrom, R. Anson, V.K. Clawson, Group facilitation and group support systems, in: L.M. Jessup, J.S. Valacich (Eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives, McMillan Publishing Company, New York, 1993, pp. 146-168.
    • [7] P. Checkland, Soft systems methodology, in: J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001 , pp. 61- 90.
    • [8] B. Choi, H. Lee, An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance, Information & Management (40) 2003, pp. 403-417.
    • [9] W.M. Cohen, D. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly (35) 1990, pp. 128-152.
    • [10] J. Conklin, Wicked problems and social complexity, Working Paper of the CogNexus Institute, 2003 (Available at: http:// www.gdss.com/index.html).
    • [11] W.H. Cooper, R.B. Gallupe, S. Pollard, J. Cadsby, Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming, Small Group Research (29) 1998, pp. 147-178.
    • [12] F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly (13) 1989, pp. 319-339.
    • [13] A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, T.A. Carte, M.J. Garfield, B.J. Haley, Research report: the effectiveness of multiple dialogues in electronic brainstorming, Information Systems Research (8) 1997, pp. 203-211.
    • [14] K.C. Desouza, Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management: some preliminary insights, Information & Management (41) 2003, pp. 63-74.
    • [15] M. Diehl, W. Stroebe, Productivity loss in idea generation groups: Tracking down the blocking effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (61) 1991, pp. 392- 403.
    • [16] P.F. Drucker, Concept of the Corporation, revised ed., John Day Company, New York, 1972.
    • [17] C. Eden, F. Ackermann, Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, Sage, London, 1998.
    • [18] C. Eden, F. Ackermann, Group decision and negotiation in strategy making, Group Decision and Negotiation (10) 2001, pp. 119-140.
    • [19] J.S. Edwards, P.M. Collier, D. Shaw, Making a journey in knowledge management, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management (2) 2003, pp. 135-152.
    • [20] H.G. Enns, S.L. Huff, B.R. Golden, How CIOs obtain peer commitment to strategic IS proposals: barriers and facilitators, Journal of Strategic Information Systems (10) 2001, pp. 3-14.
    • [21] M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
    • [22] S.W. Floyd, B. Woodridge, Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation, Academy of Management Executive (6) 1992, pp. 27-39.
    • [23] J. Friend, The strategic choice approach, in: J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers (Eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001, pp. 115- 150.
    • [24] B. Garvey, B. Williamson, Beyond Knowledge Management: Dialogue, Creativity and the Corporate Curriculum, PrenticeHall, Essex, 2002.
    • [25] P.H. Grinyer, A cognitive approach to group strategic decision taking: a discussion of evolved practice in the light of received research results, Journal of the Operational Research Society (51) 2000, pp. 21-35.
    • [26] V. Grover, T.H. Davenport, General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda, Journal of Management Information Systems (18) 2001, pp. 5-21.
    • [27] M.T. Hansen, Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies, Organization Science (13) 2002, pp. 232-248.
    • [28] C.W. Holsapple, K.D. Joshi, Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study, Information & Management 39(6), 2002, pp. 477-490.
    • [29] G.P. Huber, Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies, European Journal of Information Systems (10) 2001, pp. 72-79.
    • [30] A. Inkpen, Creating knowledge through collaboration, California Management Review (39) 1996, pp. 123-140.
    • [31] C.M. Jackson, S. Chow, R.A. Leitch, Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system, Decision Sciences (28) 1997, pp. 357- 389.
    • [32] B.A. Jain, J.S. Solomon, The effect of task complexity and conflict handling styles on computer-supported negotiations, Information & Management 37(4), 2000, pp. 161- 168.
    • [33] M.T. Jelassi, R.A. Beauclair, An integrated framework for group decision support systems design, Information & Management (13) 1987, pp. 143-153.
    • [34] M.A. Korsgaard, D.M. Schweiger, H.J. Sapienza, Building commitment, attachment and trust in strategic decision making teams: the role of procedural justice, Academy of Management Journal (38) 1995, pp. 60-84.
    • [35] P. Legris, J. Ingham, P. Collerette, Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model Information & Management (40) 2003, pp. 191-204.
    • [36] Y. Malhotra, D.F. Galletta, Role of commitment and motivation in knowledge management systems implementation: theory, conceptualization, and measurement of antecedents of success, in: Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii, 2003.
    • [37] J. McKenzie, A. Truc, C. van Winkelen, Winning commitment for knowledge management initiatives, Journal of Change Management (2) 2001, pp. 115-127.
    • [38] J.P. Meyer, L. Herscovitch, Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model, Human Resource Management Review (11) 2001, pp. 299-326.
    • [39] J.M. Mezias, P. Grinyer, W.D. Guth, Changing collective cognition: a process model for strategic change, Long Range Planning (34) 2001, pp. 71-95.
    • [40] M. Newman, R. Sabherwal, Determinants of commitment to information systems development: a longitudinal investigation, MIS Quarterly 20(1), 1996, pp. 23-54.
    • [41] M. Parent, R.B. Gallupe, W.D. Salisbury, J.M. Handelma, Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? Information & Management (38) 2000, pp. 47-58.
    • [42] J. Pfeffer, The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998 .
    • [43] L. Phillips, M. Phillips, Facilitated work groups: theory and practice, Journal of the Operational Research Society (44) 1993, pp. 533-549.
    • [44] M. Pidd, Tools For Thinking: Modelling in Management Science, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1996.
    • [45] G. Probst, S. Raub, K. Romhardt, Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2000.
    • [46] H.W.J. Rittel, M.M. Webber, Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences (4) 1973, pp. 155-169.
    • [47] J. Rosenhead, J. Mingers, Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2001.
    • [48] J. Roth, A. Styhre, Knowledge facilitation at AstraZeneca, European Academy of Management Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, May 9-11, 2002.
    • [49] D. Shaw, Evaluating electronic workshops through analysing the 'brainstormed' ideas, Journal of the Operational Research Society (54) 2003, pp. 692-705.
    • [50] D. Shaw, F. Ackermann, C. Eden, Sharing knowledge in group problem structuring, Journal of the Operational Research Society (54) 2003, pp. 936-948.
    • [51] D. Shaw, M. Westcombe, J. Hodgkin, G. Montibeller, Problem structuring methods for large groups interventions, Journal of the Operational Research Society (55) 2004, pp. 453-463.
    • [52] D. Shaw, J.S. Edwards, B. Baker, P.M. Collier, Achieving closure through knowledge management strategy, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management (1) 2003, pp. 197- 205.
    • [53] H.A. Simon, From substantive to procedural rationality, in: S.J. Latsis (Ed.), Method and Appraisals in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976, pp. 424-443.
    • [54] R.H. Sprague, A framework for the development of decision support systems, MIS Quarterly (4) 1980, pp. 1-26.
    • [55] R.H. Sprague, E.D. Carlson, Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1982.
    • [56] M. Turoff, S.R. Hiltz, Computer support for group versus individual decisions, IEEE Transactions Communications, COM-30 (1) 1982, pp. 82-90.
    • [57] D. Ulrich, Intellectual capital equals competence x commitment, Sloan Management Review (39) 1998, pp. 15- 26.
    • [58] K. van der Heijden, C. Eden, The theory and praxis of reflective learning in strategy making, in: C. Eden, J.-C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Sage, London, 1998.
    • [59] V. Venkatesh, Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation, MIS Quarterly (23) 1999, pp. 239-260.
    • [60] L.R. Weingart, R.J. Bennett, J.M. Brett, The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation in group negotiation process and outcome, Journal of Applied Psychology (78) 1993, pp. 504-517.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article