LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Islam, Md Shahidul (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HG
In response to the spectacular financial reporting failures in Western economies in the\ud early 21st century, the UK has undergone a series of regulatory reforms and the Ethical\ud Standards (ES) by the Auditing Practices Board (APB) are among the most prominent.\ud While the issues of joint provision of audit and non-audit services (NAS) and long audit\ud firm tenure died down following the enactment of ES in 2004, they attracted comments\ud from regulators and policymakers in the wake of the 2007-09 financial crisis. This\ud makes such joint provision and extended tenure long-standing, potentially unresolved\ud issues even in a changed regulatory setting. In this context, the current study has been\ud motivated to investigate the impact of NAS and audit firm tenure regulations on de\ud facto auditor independence and financial reporting quality (FRQ) of FTSE350\ud companies. Using estimates of discretionary accruals and measures for auditors‟\ud economic dependence, the study finds little support against popular arguments that NAS\ud fees and long audit firm tenure erode FRQ. Out of two measures of auditors‟ economic\ud dependence, „total fees to auditors‟ is documented to be significantly negatively\ud associated with discretionary accruals during the post-APB ES period. The „differencein-\ud differences‟ method provides some evidence at a marginally significant level for\ud ES‟s causal impact in improving FRQ during post-APB ES period, ceteris paribus.\ud Tests of association between audit firm tenure and FRQ suggest, with a caveat of\ud marginally significant results, that audits conducted during the post-APB ES period\ud have a mitigating effect on discretionary accruals and that longer audit firm tenure does\ud not compromise auditor independence but in fact helps to improve FRQ in the form of\ud lower discretionary accruals. These empirical findings have weak support for\ud policymakers‟ views that an outright prohibition on supplying NAS for audit clients and\ud mandating more frequent rotation of auditors would help to improve FRQ. Results from\ud the final set of tests suggest a marginally significant negative association between audit\ud firm tenure and discretionary accruals for companies audited by Big4 auditors but not\ud for those audited by their non-Big4 counterparts. This provides insight to the most\ud recent regulatory concerns about the concentrated audit market with Big4 domination.\ud The study, therefore, makes important empirical contributions with policy implications.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • The Accounting Review 85(6), pp. 2075-2105.
    • Meyer, B. 1995. Natural and quasi-natural experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(2), pp. 151-162.
    • Mitra, S. and Hossain, M. 2007. Ownership composition and non-audit service fees.
    • Journal of Business Research 60(4), pp. 348-356.
    • Moizer, P. 1991. Independence. In: Sherer, M. and Turley, S. (eds.) Current Issues in Auditing. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 34-46.
    • Monroe, G. S. and Teh, S. T. 1993. Predicting uncertainty audit qualifications in Australia using publicly available information. Accounting and Finance 32(1), pp. 79- 106.
    • Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L. and Bazerman, M. H. 2006. Conflict of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling.
    • Academy of Management Review 31(1), pp. 10-29.
    • Morgan, S. L. and Winship, C. 2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Mouselli, S., Jaafar, A. and Goddard, J. 2013. Accruals quality, stock returns and asset pricing: Evidence from the UK. International Review of Financial Analysis 30, pp. 203- 213.
    • Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W. and McKeown, J. C. 1997.The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt firms.
    • Journal of Accounting Research 35(Autumn), pp. 295-310.
    • Myers, J., Myers, L. A. and Omer, T. C. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78(3), pp. 779-800.
    • Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. A. and TarpIey, R. L. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers‟ and auditors‟ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review 77(Supplement), pp. 175-202.
    • Neuman, W. L. 2011. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
    • Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22(2), pp. 679-702.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article