LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fernandez-de-Alava, M; Quesada Pallares, C (2017)
Publisher: Sociedad Española de Pedagogía
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
INTRODUCTION. The lack of teaching professionals with continuous training affects quality in educational systems and quality of teaching. That is why we believe that teachers must increase or improve their professional competences once they have finished their initial training. To do so, learning strategies are needed, but they vary according to training aspirations and gender. OCDE (2007) and Quesada-Pallarès, Fernández-de-Álava and Rebollar-Sánchez (2015) show differences between men and women. METHOD. This article uses the last data collected with the PIAAC survey, administered in 2012. 23 countries participated in the PIAAC survey, obtaining a total of 157,000 responses. We opt for a quantitative methodology for determining if the use of learning strategies of European teachers varies according to gender, and period of teaching. RESULTS. The main results of this article show that men, compared to women, and university and higher education teachers, compared to those who teach in other teaching periods, make greater use of learning strategies. DISCUSSION. These outcomes help towards the building of a unified framework for continuous training and learning strategies; pointing out that learning strategies are determined by work demands, and activities carried out by teachers according to their period of teaching. Likewise, the results pose some challenges related to the teacher profile, and the non-use of learning strategies by women for self-promotion.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bender, K. A., Donohue, S. M. y Heywood, J. S. (2005). Job satisfaction and gender segregation. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(3), 479-496. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpi015
    • Bernardo, J. (2004). Estrategias de aprendizaje: para aprender más y mejor. Madrid: Ediciones Rialp.
    • Billett, S. (2010). The perils of confusing lifelong learning with lifelong education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(4), 401-413. DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2010.488803
    • Bolívar, A. (2007). La formación inicial del profesorado de secundaria y su identidad profesional. Estudios sobre educación, 12, 13-30.
    • Bolívar, A. (2006). La formación inicial del profesorado y el desarrollo de las instituciones de formación. En J. M. Escudero y A. Luis (Eds.), La formación del profesorado y la mejora de la educación (pp. 119-150). Barcelona: Octaedro.Calás, M. B. y Smircich, L. (1993). Re-writing Gender into Organizational Theoring: Directions from Feminist Perspectives. En J. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon, y B. K. Townsend (Coords.), Woman in higher education: a feminist perspective (pp. 97- 117). Needham Heihts, MA: Gin Press.
    • Carrasquer Oto, P. y Martín Atiles, A. (2005). La política de conciliación de la vida laboral y familiar en la negación colectiva: un aspecto de la estrategia europea de empleo. Cuadernos de relaciones laborales, 23(1), 131-150.
    • Devos, A. (2000). Women Research21: Responding to the issue for beginning women academics. HERDSA News, 22(2), 11-13.
    • Dueñas, D., Iglesias, C. y Llorente, R. (2014). Segregación ocupacional por género en España: ¿exclusión o confinamiento? Revista Internacional del Trabajo, 133(2), 345 371. DOI: 10.1111/j.1564-9148.2014.00210.x
    • Dumas-Caré, A., Mas, C. y Garret, R. (1990). Formación inicial del profesorado de ciencias en Francia, Inglaterra y Gales y España. Análisis de la organización de los estudios y nuevas tendencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 8(3), 274-281.
    • Ely, R. J. y Meyerson, D. E. (2000, Julio 28). Theories of gender in organizations: a new approach to organizational analysis and change. Working paper, 8. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/VhpL8M
    • Esteve, J. M. (2001). El profesorado de secundaria: hacia un nuevo perfil profesional para enfrentar los problemas de la educación contemporánea. Fuentes: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, 3, 15-42.
    • Fritsch, S., Berger, S., Seifried, J., Bouley, F., Wuttke, E., Schnick-Vollmer, K. y Schmitz, B. (2015). The impact of university teacher training on prospective a comparison between Austria and Germany. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s40461- 015-0014-8
    • Ginther, D. y Kahn, S. (2006, Julio 30). Careers in Academic Social Science: Progress, Pitfalls, and Plateaus. Recuperado de: http://goo.gl/TW5TwL
    • Giust, A. (2013). Increasing Informal Learning Opportunities for Teachers in the School Setting. En M. S. Plakhotnik y S. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual
    • Glass, J. (1990). The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68(3), 779-796. DOI: 10.1093/sf/68.3.779
    • González, M. (2009). Una nueva oportunidad para la formación inicial del profesorado de Educación Secundaria. Revista de Educación, 350, 57-78.
    • Goodson, I. V. y Hargreaves, A. (Ed.) (1996). Falmer Press.
    • Imbernón, F. (2007a). La formación permanente del profesorado. Nuevas ideas para formar en la innovación y el cambio. Barcelona: Graó.
    • Imbernón, F. (2007b). La formación inicial del profesorado de secundaria. ¿Sigue siendo un tema pendiente? Aula de Innovación Educativa, 161, 5-6.
    • Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa (2013). PIAAC. Programa Internacional para la evaluación de las competencias de la población adulta. 2013. Informe español. Volumen I. Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica, Subdirección General de Documentación y Publicaciones.
    • Kim, S. y McLean, G. N. (2014). The impact of national culture on informal learning in the workplace. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(1), 39-59. DOI: 10.1177/0741713613504125
    • Lohman, M. C. (2006). Factors influencing teachers' engagement in informal learning activities. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3), 141-156. DOI: 10.1108/13665620610654577
    • Lohman, M. C. (2000). Environmental inhibitors to informal learning in the workplace: A case study of public school teachers. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(2), 83-101. DOI: 10.1177/07417130022086928
    • Lowe, G. S. (2000). The quality of work: A people-centered agenda. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
    • Quesada-Pallarès, C., Fernández-de-Álava, M. y Rebollar-Sánchez, E. M. (2015). Diferencias de género en la participación de la población adulta en actividades de aprendizaje no formal e informal: situación actual en España. Bordón, 67(3), 123- 142. DOI: 10.13042/Bordon.2015.67307
    • Resnick, L. B. y Beck, I. L. (1976). Designing instruction in Reading: Interaction of theory and practice. En J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Aspects of reading acquisition (pp. 1-33). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J. y Dierking, D. (2000). Self-regultation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. En M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727-747). San Diego: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50051-2
    • Autora 1 (persona de contacto): Miren Fernández-de-Álava
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article