LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hole, Graham J; George, Patricia A (1995)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Factors affecting the accuracy with which adults could assess the age of unfamiliar male faces aged between 5 and 70 years were examined. In the first experiment twenty-five 'young' adult subjects, aged 16-25, and twenty-five 'old' adults, aged 51-60, were used. Each subject saw five versions of three different faces: these consisted of an original version of each face and four manipulated versions of it. The manipulations consisted of mirror reversal, pseudo-cardioidal strain, thresholding, and elimination of all but the internal features of the face. The second experiment was similar except that a between-subjects design was used: each subject saw three faces for each age category of target face, but was exposed to only a single type of manipulation (plus a set of 'original' faces which were identical for all groups, so that the comparability of the different groups in age estimation could be checked). Results from both experiments were similar. Age estimates for unmanipulated 'original' faces were highly accurate, although subjects were most accurate with target faces that were within their own age range. Results for the manipulated faces implied that the importance of cardioidal strain as a necessary and sufficient cue to age may have been overestimated in previous reports: subjects' age estimates were accurate when cardioidal strain was absent from the stimulus, and poor when cardioidal strain was the only cue available.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bruce V, Burton M, Doyle T, Dench N, 1989 "Further experiments on the perception of growth in three dimensions" Perception & Psychophysics 46 528-536
    • Bruce V, Doyle D, Dench T, Burton M, 1991 "Remembering facial configurations" Cognition 38 109-144
    • Bruce V, Young A, 1986 "Understanding face recognition" British Journal of Psychology 11 3 0 5 - 3 2 7
    • Diamond R, Carey S, 1986 "Why faces are not special: an effect of expertise" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1 1 5 1 0 7 - 1 1 7
    • Enlow D H, 1982 Handbook of Facial Growth 2nd edition (Philadelphia, PA: W B Saunders Company)
    • Jones G, Smith P K, 1984 "The eyes have it: young children's discrimination of age in masked and unmasked facial photographs" Journal ofExperimental Child Psychology 3 8 3 2 8 - 3 3 7
    • M a r k L S , Pittenger J B, Hines H, Carello C, Shaw R E , Todd J T, 1980 "Wrinkling and head shapes as coordinated sources of age-level information" Perception & Psychophysics 27 117-124
    • Mark L S, Todd J T, 1983 "The perception of growth in three dimensions" Perception & Psychophysics 3 3 1 9 3 - 1 9 6
    • Mark L S, Todd J T, 1985 "Describing perceptual information about human growth in terms of geometric invariants" Perception & Psychophysics 3 7 2 4 5 - 2 5 6
    • Montepare J M, McArthur L Z, 1986 "The influence of facial characteristics on children's age perception" Journal ofExperimental Child Psychology 42 303 - 314
    • Pittenger J B, Shaw R E, 1975 "Ageing faces as visceral-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1 3 7 4 - 4 8 2
    • Pittenger J B, Shaw R E, Mark L S, 1979 "Perceptual information for the age-level of faces as a higher-order invariant of growth" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5 4 7 8 - 4 9 3
    • Rhodes G, McLean I G, 1990 "Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimulitowards a model of configural coding" Perception 19 773 - 794
    • Shepherd J W, Davies G M, Ellis H D, 1981 "Studies of cue saliency", in Perceiving and Remembering Faces Eds G Davies, H Ellis, J Shepherd (London: Academic Press)
    • Smith A D, Winograd E, 1978 "Adult age differences in remembering faces" Developmental Psychology 14 4 4 3 - 4 4 4
    • Valentine T, 1991 "A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A-Human Experimental Psychology 4 3 1 6 1 - 2 0 4
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article