Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Scobbie, James M; Punnoose, Reenu; Khattab, Ghada (2013)
Publisher: BU Press
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
We investigate the lingual shapes of the five liquid phonemes of Malayalam: two rhotics, two laterals and a more problematic 5th liquid. Ultrasound is used to image the mid-sagittal tongue surface, mainly in an intervocalic within-word /a__a/ context. The dark retroflex lateral and trill have a retracted tongue root and lowered tongue dorsum, while the three other clear liquids show advanced tongue root and dorsal raising. The 5th liquid is post-alveolar and laminal. Some additional data from an /a__i/ context is considered: the liquids are slightly clearer before /i/: all have a slightly advanced tongue root, and all bar the trill show palatalization. Dynamically, the trill and retroflex lateral have a very stable tongue root in /a__a/, and the 5th liquid has unusual anterior kinematic properties which require further investigation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Articulate Instruments. 2008. Ultrasound Stabilisation Headset users manual: revision 1.13. Edinburgh: Articulate Instruments Ltd.
    • Articulate Instruments. 2011. Articulate Assistant Advanced Ultrasound Module user manual, revision 2.14. Edinburgh: Articulate Instruments Ltd. [Associated computer program http://www.articulateinstruments.com].
    • Asher, Ronald & T. C. Kumari. 1997. Malayalam. London: Routledge.
    • Davidson, Lisa. 2012. Ultrasound as a tool for speech research. In Abigail Cohn, Cécile Fougeron & Marie Hufman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Laboratory Phonology, 484-496. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gick, Bryan. 2002. The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(2). 113-121.
    • Jones, Mark. Submitted. Patterns of variability in apical trills: an acoustic study of data from 19 languages.
    • Kavitskaya, Darya, Khalil Iskarous, Aude Noiray & Michael Proctor. 2009. Trills and palatalization: consequences for sound change. In Reich Jodi, Maria Babyonyshev & Darya Kavitskaya (eds.), Annual WorkshopFoonrmal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: hTe Yale Meeting 2008, 97-110. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
    • Kochetov, Alexei, N. Sreedevi, & Midula Kasim. 2012. Analysis of tongue shapes during the production of Kannada consonants. http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1063&context=alexei_kochetov.
    • Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kumari, Syamala. 1972. Malayalam phonetic reader. Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
    • Lawson, Eleanor, James Scobbie & Jane Stuart-Smith. 2011. The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish EJonugrnlaislhof. Sociolinguistics 15. 256-268.
    • Lawson, Eleanor, Jane Stuart-Smith & James Scobbie. 2008. Articulatory insights into language variation and change: preliminary findings from an ultrasound study of derhoticisation in Scottish English. Papers from NWAV 36: University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14.(2). 102-110.
    • McDonough, Joyce & Keith Johnson. 1997. Tamil liquids: an investigation into the basis of the contrast among five liquids in a dialect of Tamil. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27. 1-26.
    • Narayanan, Srikanth, Dani Byrd & Abigail Kaun. 1999. Geometry, kinematics, and acoustics of Tamil liquid consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(4) 1993-2007.
    • Proctor, Michael. 2011. Towards a gestural characterization of liquids: evidence from Spanish and Russian. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 451-485.
    • Punnoose, Reenu. 2011. An auditory and acoustic study of liquids in Malayalam. University of Newcastle PhD thesis.
    • Punnoose, Reenu, Ghada Khattab & Jalal Al-Tamimi. 2012. The contested fifth liquid in Malayalam: a window into the lateral-rhotic relationship in Dravidian languages. Unpublished ms.
    • Recasens, Daniel & Maria Dolors Pallarés. 1999. A stɾu/daynodf/r// in the light of the “DAC” coarticulation model. Journal of Phonetics 27. 143-169.
    • Scobbie, James & Marianne Pouplier. 2010. The role of syllable structure in external sandhi: an EPG study of vocalization and retraction in word-final English /l/. Journal of Phonetics 38. 240-259.
    • Scobbie, James & Jane Stuart-Smith. 2008. Quasi-phonemic contrast and the fuzzy inventory: examples from Scottish English. In Peter Avery, Elan Dresher & Keren Rice (eds.), Contrast: Perception and Acquisition: Selected papers from the second International Conference on Contrast in Phonology, 87-113. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Scobbie, James, Alan Wrench & Marietta van der Linden. 2008. Head-Probe stabilisation in ultrasound tongue imaging using a headset to permit natural hea movement.Proceedings of ISSP'08, 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, 373-376. Strasbourg.
    • Wrench, Alan & James Scobbie. 2006. Spatio-temporal inaccuracies of video-based ultrasound images of the tongue. Proceedings of ISSP'06, the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, 451-458. Ubatuba.
    • Wrench, Alan & James Scobbie. 2011. Very high frame rate ultrasound tongue imaging. Proceedings of ISSP'11, the 9th International Seminar on Speech Production, 155-162. Montreal.
    • Zharkova, Natalia & Nigel Hewlett. 2009. Measuring lingual coarticulation from midsagittal tongue contours: description and example calculations using English /t/ and /ɑ/. Journal of Phonetics 37(2). 248-256.
    • Mary Baltazani & Katerina Nicolaidis................................................................................ 125
    • Hans Van de Velde, Evie Tops & Roeland van Hout ..................................................... 227
    • Gillian Sankoff & Hélène Blondeau .................................................................................. 249
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article