Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pongo, Brilliant
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: UOW9
The study investigates how online media are contributing to democracy in Africa. It is interested in the growing online media spaces and their democratic promise. The case study is on diasporic media by citizens from troubled Zimbabwe, whose mass media environment remained a subject of much debate. Between 2000 and 2009, many Zimbabwean local independent media organisations were banned from reporting from within the country and many ordinary Zimbabweans were forced to seek economic and political refuge in South Africa, Britain, Australia, USA and many other countries. Some journalists were arrested and most researchers linked this to the erosion of democracy under the ZANU PF government, which has been in power since 1980.1 A new opposition challenged ZANU PF monopoly of political power but fiercely contested elections saw the diasporic media engage with Zimbabwe issues more and more. Faced with an intransigent political situation, Zimbabwe’s three main political parties2 agreed a coalition/inclusive government in February 2009, as an interim measure. In the main, diasporic media continued to call for the removal of restrictions imposed on the media3. This is not to rule out differences amongst Zimbabweans abroad. Zimbabweans abroad seek to promote a more pluralistic media approach and operate websites transnationally, and in ways that have begun to challenge the existing media monopoly in Zimbabwe. Influential diasporic sites include newzimbabwe.com, zimdaily.com, talkzimbabwe.com, zimbabwemetro.com thezimbabwean.com and thezimbabwetimes.com. My study is focused on the use of internet communication forms for democratic purposes by such groups. The aim of the research is to ask how such new media is influencing traditional forms of control of information by political and economic groups in Zimbabwe. The research will argue that new media technologies have the potential to allow users, mainly those in the Diaspora, increased opportunities to share and develop participate in current affairs and politics. While the state has tightened its grip on the old media (e.g. radio, print press and television) new media technologies have enabled their users to undermine the government’s monopoly on information distribution. The tight legislative response of the state is a testament to the effectiveness of these forms of new media. The main thrust of this study will be to investigate new internet sites and their role in Zimbabwean democracy, using Zimdaily.com as a case study. The work contributes to work on the role of African Diasporic Media in Democratic Processes, on the one hand, while on the other hand, it is also about New ICTs and Democracy in Africa.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bloch, Alice (2007). Methodological challenges for national and multi-sited comparative survey research. In: Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 230-247.
    • Bryman, A. (2004). Social Research Methods. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Careless, Sue (2000). Advocacy journalism, The Interim available at: http://faculty.uncsa.edu/film/jackson/fall/fim330/fall08/on%20Advocacy%20Journalism.pdf [accessed: 18.03.09].
    • Chari, T. (2007). “Rethinking ethical issues in African media”, African Identities, 5(1): 39-60.
    • Chetsanga, C. J. & T. B. Muchenje. (2003). An analysis of the cause and effect of the brain drain in Zimbabwe. Harare: Scientific and Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC).
    • Chitando, E. (2005). “'In the beginning was the land': the appropriation of religious themes in political discourses in Zimbabwe”, Africa 75(2): 220-239.
    • Chiumbu, Sarah (2004). Redefining the national agenda: media and identity - challenges of building a new Zimbabwe. In H. Melber (ed.). Media, Public Discourse and Political Contestation in Zimbabwe. Current African Issues No. 27. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, 2004, 29-35.
    • Curran, J. (1991) 'Rethinking the Media as a Public Sphere', in P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks (eds). Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
    • Curran, J. (1996) 'Media and Democracy: The Third Route', in M.B. Andersen (ed.) Media and Democracy. Oslo: Strandberg og Nilsen.
    • Dahlberg, L. (2001). “Extending the Public Sphere through Cyberspace: the Case of Minnesota E-Democracy”, First Monday 6(3): http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/838/747 [accessed: 10.03.09].
    • Downing, J. (2003). “The Independent Media Centre Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition”, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds.). Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 243-257.
    • Flick, Uwe (1999). Qualitative Forschung: Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. 4. Aufl..Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
    • Franks, S. (2005). “Reporting Africa: Problems and Perspectives”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 129-134.
    • Fraser, N. (1992). “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”, in C. Calhoun (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 109-142.
    • Frederikse, J. (1982). None but ourselves: masses vs. media in the making of Zimbabwe. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
    • Gramsci, A. (1971) Prison Notebooks, London, Lawrence and Wishart Habermas, J. (1974). The Public Sphere: An Encyclopaedic Article. New German Critique, No. 3:49-55.
    • Habermas, J. (1989). Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Hannerz, Ulf (1998). Transnational research. In: H. Russell Bernard (ed.).
    • Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press. 235- 265.
    • Horst, Cindy (2002). Transnational dialogues: developing ways to do research in a diasporic community. Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies. Paper presented for a transnationalism seminar at the CERES summer school 'pathways of development', Utrecht University, 26.-28.
    • June 2002.
    • Hydén, G., M. Leslie, and F.F. Ogundimu (eds) (2002). Media and Democracy in Africa. Uppsala: The Nordic Africa Institute.
    • Jackson, J. (2007). “Skirmishing with Zimbabwe's Censors”, in B. James (ed.). New Media - The Press Freedom Dimension: Challenges and Opportunities of New Media for Press Freedom. UNESCO, 71-73.
    • Jowett, G and O'Donnell, V. (1991) Propaganda and Persuasion, London SAGE publications, Inc.
    • Kavada, A. (2004). “Exploring the role of the internet in the 'movement for alternative globalization': The case of the Paris 2003 European Social Forum”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2(1): 72-95.
    • Keane J. (1996) Structural transformation of the public sphere, in M. Andersen (ed.). Media and democracy. Oslo: University of Oslo Press.
    • Keane, J. (1991) The Media and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Kirk, Rachel (2004). Skills audit of refugees. Home Office Online Report 37/04.
    • Available at: www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr3704.pdf (accessed: 27.07.07).
    • Lamnek, Siegfried (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung. 4. vollst. überarb. Aufl..
    • Lee, Raymond M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
    • Lindner, Rolf (1981). Die Angst des Forschers vor dem Feld: Überlegungen zur teilnehmenden Beobachtung als Interaktionsprozeß. In: Zeitschrift für Völkerkunde Nr.77, 51-66.
    • MacBride, Sean (1980). Many voices, One World: Towards a new more just and more efficient world information and communication order / International Commission for the Study of Communication Problems, Paris: UNESCO.
    • Maier, Charles S. (2006). Transformations of territoriality 1600-2000. In: Gunilla Budde, Sebastian Conrad & Oliver Janz (Hrsg.). Transnationale Geschichte: Themen, Tendenzen und Theorien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 32-55.
    • Mano, W. (2005a). “Editorial”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 1-7.
    • Mano, W. (2005b). “Press Freedom, Professionalism and Proprietorship: Behind the Zimbabwean Media Devide”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 56-70.
    • Mano, W. (2008). The Media and Politics in Zimbabwe: Turning Left while Indicating Right”, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4): 507-514.
    • Marcus, George E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
    • Mavhunga, S. (2008). “The Glass Fortress: Zimbabwe's Cyber-Guerrilla Warfare”, Concerned Africa Scholars, 80: 21-27. Available at: http://concernedafricascholars.org/docs/acasbullitin80-4.pfd [accessed: 01.03.09]
    • May, T. (1997). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Mazango, E.M. (2005). “Media games and shifting of spaces for political communication in Zimbabwe”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 33-55.
    • Meiklejohn, Alexander (1960). Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. New York: Harper.
    • Melber, Henning (2004). Inside the “Third Chimurenga”: Media Repression, Manipulation and Hegemony in Zimbabwe - Some Introductory Notes. In H. Melber (ed.). Media, Public Discourse and Political Contestation in Zimbabwe. Current African Issues No. 27. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, 2004, 7-11.
    • Mosia, L., C. Riddle and J. Zaffiro (1994). “From Revolutionary to Regime Radio: Three Decades of Nationalist Broadcasting in Southern Africa”, Africa Media Review, 8(1): 1-24.
    • Moyo , D. (2007). “Alternative media, diasporas and the mediation of the Zimbabwe crisis”, Ecquid Novi, 28(1&2): 81-105.
    • Moyo, D. (2004). From Rhodesia to Zimbabwe: change without change? Broadcasting policz reform and political control. In H. Melber (ed.). Media, Public Discourse and Political Contestation in Zimbabwe. Current African Issues No. 27. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, 2004, 12-28.
    • Moyo, D. (2005). “The 'independent' press and the fight for democracy in Zimbabwe: A critical analysis of the banned Daily News”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 109-128.
    • Ndangam, L.N. (2008). “Free lunch? Cameroon's diaspora and online news publishing”, New Media & Society, 10(4): 585-604.
    • Tettey, W. J. (2001). “The media and democratization in Africa: contributions, constraints and concerns of the private press”, Media, Culture & Society, 23: 5-31.
    • Tynes, R. (2007). “Nation-building and the diaspora on Leonenet: a case of Sierra Leone in cyberspace”, New Media & Society, 9(3): 497-518.
    • UNESCO (1980). Communication and Society Today and Tomorrow: Many Voices One World - Towards a new more just and more efficient world information and communication order. London: Kogan Page.
    • Vatikiotis, P. (2004). “Communication Theory and Alternative Media”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2(1): 4-29.
    • Vatikiotis, P. and Kavada, A. (2004). “Editorial”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 2(1): 1-3.
    • Wahldahl, R. (2005). “Political Journalism the Zimbabwean Way: Experiences from the 2000 Election Campaign”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 18-19.
    • Watts, D. (1997) Political Communication Today, Manchester Welch, Susan (1975). Sampling by referral in a dispersed population. In: Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(2), 237-246.
    • Welz, Gisela (1998). Moving targets: Feldforschung unter Willems, W. (2005). “Remnants of Empire? British media reporting on Zimbabwe”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, Special Issue: 91-108.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article