LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sinclair, Jonathan Kenneth; Shore, Hannah; Dillon, Stephanie (2016)
Publisher: CAB International Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Identifiers:doi:10.3920/CEP150029
The aim of the current study was to explore the effects of minimalist, maximalist and energy return footwear of equal mass on economy and substrate utilisation during steady state running. Ten male runners completed 6 min steady state runs in minimalist, maximalist and energy return footwear. The mass of the footwear was controlled by adding lead tape to the lighter shoes. Running economy, shoe comfort, rating of perceived exertion and % contribution of carbohydrate to total calorie expenditure were assessed. Participants also subjectively indicated which shoe condition they preferred for running. Differences in shoe comfort and physiological parameters were examined using paired samples t-tests, whilst shoe preferences were tested using a chi-square test. The results showed firstly that running economy was significantly improved in the energy return (35.9 ml∙kg/min) compared to minimalist footwear (37.8 ml∙kg/min). In addition % carbohydrate was significantly greater in the minimalist (76.4%) in comparison to energy return footwear (72.9%). As running economy was improved and carbohydrate utilisation reduced in the energy return in comparison to minimalist footwear, the current investigation shows that these footwear are more economical when shoe mass is controlled.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bosco, C. and Rusko, H., 1983. The effect of prolonged skeletal muscle stretch-shortening cycle on recoil of elastic energy and on energy expenditure. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 119: 219-224.
    • Cavanagh, P.R. and Williams, K.R., 1982. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14: 30-35.
    • Cavanagh, P.R. and Lafortune, M.A., 1980. Ground reaction forces in distance running. Journal of Biomechanics 13: 397-406.
    • Cheung, R.T. and Ngai, S.P., in press. Effects of footwear on running economy in distance runners: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jsams.2015.03.002.
    • Daniels, J.T., 1985. A physiologist's view of running economy. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 17: 332-338.
    • Di Prampero, P.E., 2003. Factors limiting maximal performance in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology 90: 420-429.
    • Franz, J.R., Wierzbinski, C.M. and Kram, R., 2012. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 44: 1519-1525.
    • Frederick, E.C., Howley E.T. and Powers S.K., 1986. Lower oxygen demands of running in soft-soled shoes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 57: 174-177.
    • Gruber, A.H., Umberger, B.R., Braun, B. and Hamill, J., 2013. Economy and rate of carbohydrate oxidation during running with rearfoot and forefoot strike patterns. Journal of Applied Physiology 115: 194-201.
    • Hanson, N.J., Berg, K., Deka, P., Meendering, J.R. and Ryan, C., 2010. Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod. International Journal of Sports Medicine 32: 401-406.
    • Jones, A., 2006. The physiology of the world record holder for the women's marathon. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching 1: 101-116.
    • Luo, G., Stergiou, P., Worobets, J., Nigg, B. and Stefanyshyn, D., 2009. Improved footwear comfort reduces oxygen consumption during running. Footwear Science 1: 25-29.
    • McArdle, W.D., Katch, F.I. and Katch, V.L., 2010. Exercise physiology: nutrition, energy, and human performance. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
    • Moore, I.S., Jones, A. and Dixon, S., 2014. The pursuit of improved running performance: can changes in cushioning and somatosensory feedback influence running economy and injury risk? Footwear Science 6: 1-11.
    • Mündermann, A., Nigg, B.M., Stefanyshyn, D.J. and Humble, R.N., 2002. Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running. Gait and Posture 16: 38-45.
    • Nigg, B.M., Stefanyshyn, D., Cole, G., Stergiou, P. and Miller, J., 2003. The effect of material characteristics of shoe soles on muscle activation and energy aspects during running. Journal of Biomechanics 36: 569-575.
    • Rapoport, B.I., 2010. Metabolic factors limiting performance in marathon runners. PLoS One Computational Biology 6: 1-13.
    • Saunders, P.U., Pyne, D.B., Telford, R.D. and Hawley, J.A., 2004. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Medicine 34: 465-485.
    • Sinclair, J., Taylor, P.J. and Hobbs, S.J., 2013a. Alpha level adjustments for multiple dependent variable analyses and their applicability - a review. International Journal of Sports Science and Engineering 7: 17-20.
    • Sinclair, J., Greenhalgh, A., Edmundson, C.J., Brooks, D. and Hobbs, S.J., 2013b. The influence of barefoot and barefoot-inspired footwear on the kinetics and kinematics of running in comparison to conventional running shoes. Footwear Science 5: 45-53.
    • Sinclair, J., Hobbs, S.J., Currigan, G. and Taylor, P.J., 2013c. A comparison of several barefoot inspired footwear models in relation to barefoot and conventional running footwear. Comparative Exercise Physiology 9: 13-21.
    • Sinclair, J., Taylor, P.J., Edmundson, C.J., Brooks, D. and Hobbs, S.J. 2014. The influence of footwear kinetic, kinematic and electromyographical parameters on the energy requirements of steady state running. Movement and Sports Sciences 80: 39-49.
    • Sinclair, J., McGrath, R., Brook, O., Taylor, P.J. and Dillon, S., in press. Influence of footwear designed to boost energy return on running economy in comparison to a conventional running shoe. Journal of Sports Sciences. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.20 15.1088961.
    • Sinclair, J., Richards, J. and Shore, H., 2015. Effects of minimalist and maximalist footwear on Achilles tendon load in recreational runners. Comparative Exercise Physiology 11: 239-244.
    • Squadrone, R. and Gallozzi, C., 2009. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions inexperienced barefoot runners. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 49: 6-13.
    • Williams, K.R. and Cavanagh, P.R., 1987. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. Journal of Applied Physiology 63: 1236-1245.
    • Worobets, J., Wannop, J.W., Tomaras, E. and Stefanyshyn, D., 2014. Softer and more resilient running shoe cushioning properties enhance running economy. Footwear Science 6: 147-153.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article