Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cacciatori, E. (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28
This paper argues that, in order to understand the development process of new routines, we have to look at the emergence of systems of artefacts rather than at individual artefacts in isolation. The paper proposes a typology of artefacts understood as material objects that are the product of human activity and analyses their interactions in the case of an integrated engineering design consultancy engaged in the effort of developing a new bidding routine. The evidence from the case study shows that agents reinforce and extend the patterns of action that individual artefacts support by bundling different types of artefacts, and that in so doing, they extend the reach and influence of the community to which they belong. This study shows that the problem-solving and truce aspects of routines are worked out in the design of these systems of artefacts.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis - An Expanded Sourcebook: SAGE.
    • Narduzzo, A., Rocco, E. and Warglien, M. (2000). 'Talking about routines in the field: The emergence of organizational capabilities in a new cellular phone network company', in Dosi, G., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (Eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Nicolini, D., Mengis, J. and Swan, J. (2011). 'Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration'. Organization Science. Articles in Advance, July 5.
    • Nightingale, P. (2000). 'Economies of scale in experimentation: knowledge and technology in pharmaceutical R&D'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9, 315.
    • Norman, D. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
    • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). 'The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations'. Organization Science, 3, 398-427.
    • Pentland, B. and Feldman, M. (2005). 'Organizational routines as a unit of analysis'. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 793-815.
    • Pentland, B. and Feldman, M.(2008). 'Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action'. Information and Organization, 18, 235-50.
    • Pentland, B. and Rueter, H. (1994). 'Organizational routines as grammars of action'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484-510.
    • Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G., Eds. (2006). Artifacts and Organizations. Nahwah, New jersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article