Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Barrett, Jennifer Eve; Goulding, Jack Steven; Qualter, Pamela (2013)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose - The paper presents the extant literature relating to the social processes of innovation in built environment design teams. The paper connects the relevant and significant work in the field of Social Psychology and Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) to derive a theoretical framework which can be used to direct further research, towards development of the behavioural facet of design management.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach - First, we establish which aspects of social processes of innovation are already present within the AEC field and examine concepts/ideas in Social Psychology that are likely to be important in understanding group processes within AEC, applying three emergent themes of 1) social climate; 2) risk attitudes and 3) motivation and reward. Second, we identify which elements of Social Psychology may be used to expand, consolidate and develop our understanding and identify gaps in AEC specific knowledge.\ud \ud Findings - The paper suggests that whilst the AEC literature has supplanted some key elements of Social Psychology, this discipline offers a further and significant theoretical resource. However, whilst some aspects of social climate and motivation/reward are well-represented in the AEC field, these have not yet been fully explored. Furthermore, how collective attitudes to risk can influence design decision-making is identified as having a limited presence.\ud \ud Originality/value - This paper is the first to bring together the two disciplines of AEC and Social Psychology to examine the social aspects of innovative design performance in built environment teams. The paper fulfils an identified need to examine the social processes that influence innovative design performance in construction
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T. and Haslam, S.A. (2007) Creative Innovation or Crazy Irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behaviour in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.43, pp410-416 Agars, M.D., Kaufman, J.C. and Locke, T.R. (2008) Social Influence and Creativity in Organisations: A multi-level lens for theory, research and practice in Mumford, M.D., Hunter, S.T. and Avers-Bedell, K.E. (eds) Multi-level Issues in Creativity and Innovation, Elsevier, Oxford, pp3-61 Amabile, T. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity, Springer-Verlag Amabile, T.M. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations in Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol.10, pp123-167 French, J.R.P. (1956) A Formal Theory of Social Power in Psychological Review, Vol.63(3), pp181-194 Glock, F. (2009) Aspects of Language Use in Design Conversation in McDonnell, J. and Lloyd, P. (2009) About:Designing: Analysing Design Meetings, Taylor & Francis Goldschmidt, G. (1995) The Designer As A Team of One in Design Studies, Vol.16(2), pp189-209
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article