Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Aljawad, Ayman; Morgan, Maria; Fairchild, Ruth; Rees, Jeremy (2016)
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: food and beverages, stomatognathic system
Background Reducing sugar consumption is a primary focus of current global public health policy. Achieving 5% of total energy from free sugars will be difficult acknowledging the concentration of free sugars in sugar sweetened beverages, confectionery and as hidden sugars in many savoury items. The expansion of the novelty sweet market in the UK has significant implications for children and young adults as they contribute to dental caries, dental erosion and obesity.\ud \ud Objective To identify the most available types of novelty sweets within the high school fringe in Cardiff, UK and to assess their price range and where and how they were displayed in shops.\ud \ud Subjects and methods Shops within a ten minute walking distance around five purposively selected high schools in the Cardiff aea representing different levels of deprivation were visited. Shops in Cardiff city centre and three supermarkets were also visited to identify the most commonly available novelty sweets.\ud \ud Results The ten most popular novelty sweets identified in these scoping visits were (in descending order): Brain Licker, Push Pop, Juicy Drop, Lickedy Lips, Big Baby Pop, Vimto candy spray, Toxic Waste, Tango candy spray, Brain Blasterz Bitz and Mega Mouth candy spray. Novelty sweets were located on low shelves which were accessible to all age-groups in 73% (14 out of 19) of the shops. Novelty sweets were displayed in the checkout area in 37% (seven out of 19) shops. The price of the top ten novelty sweets ranged from 39p to £1.\ud \ud Conclusion A wide range of acidic and sugary novelty sweets were easily accessible and priced within pocket money range. Those personnel involved in delivering dental and wider health education or health promotion need to be aware of recent developments in children's confectionery. The potential effects of these novelty sweets on both general and dental health require further investigation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Arnadottir I B, Holbrook W P, Eggertsson H et al. Prevalence of dental erosion in children: a national survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010; 38: 521-526.
    • 2. Health & Social Care Information Centre. Child Dental Health Survey 2013, England, Wales and Northern Ireland [NS]. 19 March 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ childrens-dental-health-survey-2013 (accessed 19 May 2016).
    • 3. Cancer Research UK. Overweight and Obesity by Sex and UK Region: Children. 2011. Online information available at: http://www.cancerresearchuk. org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/ childhood-overweight-and-obesity#heading-One (Accessed May 2016).
    • 4. Moynihan PJ. The role of diet and nutrition in the aetiology and prevention of oral diseases. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 694-699.
    • 5. Fung A, Brearley Messer L. Tooth wear and associated risk factors in a sample of Australian primary school children. Aust Dent J 2013; 58: 235-245.
    • 6. Dugmore C R, Rock WP. A multifactorial analysis of factors associated with dental erosion. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 283-286; discussion 73.
    • 7. Burt B A, Pai S. Sugar consumption and caries risk: a systematic review. J Dent Educ 2001; 65: 1017-1023.
    • 8. Bartlett D W, Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, Ahmad N, Sherriff M. The association of tooth wear, diet and dietary habits in adults aged 18-30 years old. J Dent 2011; 39: 811-816.
    • 9. Malik V S, Schulze M B, Hu F B. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84: 274-288.
    • 10. Hu F B, Malik V S. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiol Behav 2010; 100: 47-54.
    • 11. Ludwig D S, Peterson K E, Gortmaker S L. Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet 2001; 357: 505-508.
    • 12. Ruxton C H, Gardner E J, McNnulty H M. Is sugar consumption detrimental to health? A review of the evidence 1995-2006. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2010; 50: 1-19.
    • 13. Harris R, Nicoll A D, Adair P M, Pine C M. Risk factors for dental caries in young children: a systematic review of the literature. Community Dent Health 2004; 21(1 Suppl): 71-85.
    • 14. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. SACN Carbohydrates and Health Report. 2015. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ sacn-carbohydrates-and-health-report (accessed 19 May 2016).
    • 15. Moynihan P J, Kelly S A. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 8-18.
    • 16. British Nutrition Foundation. 2014. Exploring sugars in the foods we buy, Frequently Asked Questions. Available at: https://www.nutrition. org.uk/attachments/article/882/Exploring%20 sugars%20FAQ.pdf (accessed 19 May 2016).
    • 17. Al-Majed I, Maguire A, Murray J J. Risk factors for dental erosion in 5-6 year old and 12-14 year old boys in Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30: 38-46.
    • 18. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Carbo - hydrates and Health report. 2015. Online information available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/ uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/ ifle/445503/SACN_Carbohydrates_and_Health.pdf (Accessed May 2016).
    • 19. Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 2013; 346: e7492.
    • 20. Mintel. Sugar Confectionery UK. 2012. Available at: http://www.sweetretailing.co.uk/indexphp/confectionery_advice/view/uk_confectionery_market_update_mintel_2012 (accessed 19 May 2016).
    • 21. Stewart K F, Fairchild R M, Jones R J, Hunter L, Harris C, Morgan M Z. Children's understandings and motivations surrounding novelty sweets: a qualitative study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013; 23: 424-434.
    • 22. Lloyds Banking Group-Halifax. Parents loosen purse strings as Pocket Money increases. 2013. Available at http://www.lloydsbankinggroup.com/ media/press-releases/2013-press-releases/halifax/ parents-loosen-purse-strings-as-pocket-moneyincreases/ (accessed 19 May 2016).
    • 23. Social Branding. Social brands 100 in FMCG ranking. 2015. Online information available at: http:// www.socialbrands100.com/uploads/rankings/ reports/HSBD1041_SB100_whitepaper_FMCG_ v5.pdf (Accessed May 2016).
    • 24. Davies R, Hunter L, Loyn T, Rees J. Sour sweets: a new type of erosive challenge? Br Dent J 2008; 204: E3; discussion 84-85.
    • 25. Beeley J A. Novelty sweets: a new cause of erosion? British Society for Dental Research Annual Scientific Meeting 2005.
    • 26. Gambon D L B, Nieuw H S, Amerongen A V. The erosive potential of candy sprays. Br Dent J 2009; 206: E20; discussion 530-531.
    • 27 Sinclair S, Winkler T. The School Fringe, From Research to Action. Nutrition Policy Unit, London Metropolitan University. 2009. Online information available at: http://www.fhf.org.uk/meetings/2008-07-08_School_Fringe.pdf (Accessed May 2016).
    • 28. Welsh Goverment. 2011. Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation. Available at: http://wales.gov.uk/ topics/statistics/theme/wimd/wimd2011/?lang=en (accessed October 2015).
    • 29. Robyn R L, Robert J M, John D R. Pucker up: the effects of sour candy on your patients' oral health. A review of the dental erosion literature and pH values for popular candies. Northwest Dent 2008; 87: 20-21.
    • 30. Chiu S H, Dimarco M A, Prokop J L. Childhood obesity and dental caries in homeless Children. J Pediatr Health Care 2013; 27: 278-283.
    • 31. Drewnowski A. The economics of food choice behaviour: why poverty and obesity Are Linked. Nestlé Nutr Inst Workshop Ser 2012; 73: 95-112.
    • 32. Mintel. Children's Eating and Drinking Habits UK. 2011. Online information available at: http://store. mintel.com/childrens-eating-and-drinking-habits-uk-february-2011 (Accessed May 2016).
    • 33. Public Health England. Sugar reduction: the evidence for action. 2015. Available at: https:// www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/470179/Sugar_reduc - tion_The_evidence_for_action.pdf (accessed April 2016).
    • 34. UK Parliament. Sugar: Taxation. 2016. Online information available at: https://www.parliament. uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2016- 03-17/HL7177/ (Accessed 24 May 2016).
    • 35. Wyness L A, Butriss J L, Stanner S A. Reducing the population's sodium intake: the UK Food Standards Agency's salt reduction programme. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 254-261.
    • 36. Consensus. Food industry progress. 2014. Available at: http://www.actiononsalt.org.uk/news/industry/31988.html (accessed 19 May 2016).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article