Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Herbert, R.; Gregory, E.; Best, W. (2014)
Publisher: Wiley
Types: Article
Subjects: aphasia, anomia, syntax, generalization, conversation
Background: Previous studies of therapy for acquired anomia have treated nouns in isolation. The effect on nouns in connected speech remains unclear. In a recent study in 2012, we used a novel noun syntax therapy and found an increase in the number of determiner plus noun constructions in narrative after therapy.\ud \ud Aims: Two aims arose from the previous study: to identify the critical ingredient in the noun syntax therapy, speci´Čücally whether this is lexical production, or the syntactic context; and to extend the analysis of the effects beyond narrative into conversation.\ud \ud Methods & Procedures: We compared the effects of lexical therapy with those of noun syntax therapy in one individual with aphasia, in a sequential intervention design. We analysed the effects on conversation and on narrative.\ud \ud Outcomes & Results: There was improved picture naming of treated words after both therapies. Lexical therapy had no impact on narrative and conversation, whereas noun syntax therapy led to more noun production, primarily in the context of determiner plus noun combinations.\ud \ud Conclusions & Implications: The results support the claim that greater impact on narrative and conversation can be achieved for some people with aphasia by treating nouns in syntactic contexts.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • BEST, W., GRASSLY, J., GREENWOOD, A., HERBERT, R., HICKIN, J. and HOWARD, D., 2011, A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 229-242.
    • BOYLE, M. and COELHO, C. A. 1995, Application of a semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 4, 94-98.
    • CARAMAZZA, A., 1997, How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177-208.
    • CONROY, P., SAGE, K. and RALPH, M. L., 2009, Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 1036- 1062.
    • DELL, G. S., SCHWARTZ, M. F., MARTIN, N., SAFFRAN, E. M. and GAGNON, D. A., 1997, Lexical access in normal and aphasic speech. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
    • FISHER, C. A., WILSHIRE, C. E. and PONSFORD, J. L., 2009, Word discrimination therapy: a new technique for the treatment of a phonologically based word-finding impairment. Aphasiology, 23(6), 676-693.
    • HERBERT, R. and BEST, W., 2010, The role of noun syntax in spoken word production: evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 46, 329- 342.
    • HERBERT, R., BEST, W., HICKIN, J., HOWARD, D. and OSBORNE, F., 2001, Phonological and orthographic approaches to the treatment of word retrieval in aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 7-12.
    • HERBERT, R., BEST, W., HICKIN, J., HOWARD, D. and OSBORNE, F., 2003, Combining lexical and interactional approaches to therapy for word finding deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 1163-1186.
    • HERBERT, R., HICKIN, J., HOWARD, D., OSBORNE, F. and BEST, W., 2008, Do picture naming tests provide a valid assessment of everyday functional lexical retrieval? Aphasiology, 22(2), 184-203.
    • HERBERT, R., WEBSTER, D. and DYSON, L., 2012, Effects of syntactic cueing therapy on picture naming and connected speech in acquired aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 609- 633.
    • HICKIN, J., BEST, W., HERBERT, R., HOWARD, D. and OSBORNE, F., 2002, Phonological therapy for word finding difficulties: a re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16, 981-999.
    • HICKIN, J., HERBERT, R., BEST, W., HOWARD, D. and OSBORNE, F., 2006, Efficacy of treatment: effects on word retrieval and conversation. In S. Byng, K. Swinburn and C. Pound (eds), Aphasia Therapy File (Hove: Psychology Press), vol. II, pp. 69- 82.
    • HOWARD, D., HICKIN, J., REDMOND, T., CLARK, P. and BEST, W., 2006, Re-visiting 'semantic facilitation' of word retrieval for people with aphasia: facilitation yes but semantic no. Cortex, 42(6), 946-962.
    • HOWARD, D. and PATTERSON, K. E., 1992, The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Co.).
    • HOWARD, D., PATTERSON, K. E., FRANKLIN, S. E., ORCHARD-LISLE, V. and MORTON, J., 1985, The treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia: a comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817-829.
    • LESSER, R., 1989, Some issues in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of anomia. In X. Seron and G. Deloche (eds), Cognitive Approaches in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), pp 65-104.
    • LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A. and MEYER, A. S., 1999, A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
    • LINEBARGER, M. C., MCCALL, D. and BERNDT, R. S., 2004, The role of processing support in the remediation of aphasic language disorders. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2-4), 267-282.
    • MICELI, G., AMITRANO, A., CAPASSO, R. and CARAMAZZA, A., 1996, The remediation of anomia resulting from output lexical damage: analysis of two cases. Brain and Language, 52, 150-174.
    • NICKELS, L. A., 1997, Spoken Word Production and its Breakdown in Aphasia (Hove: Psychology Press).
    • NICKELS, L. A., 2002, Improving word-finding: practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16, 1047-1060.
    • OSBORNE, F., HICKIN, J., BEST, W., HOWARD, D. and HERBERT, R., 1998, Treating word-finding difficulties-beyond picture naming. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 208-213.
    • PERKINS, L., CRISP, J. and WALSHAW, D., 1999, Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: the issue of reliability. Aphasiology, 3, 259-281.
    • RIDDOCH, M. J. and HUMPHREYS, G. W., 1992, BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery (Hove: Psychology Press).
    • SAFFRAN, E. M., BERNDT, R. S. and SCHWARTZ, M., 1989, The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37(3), 440-479.
    • SCHRIEFERS, H., 1993, Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 19(4), 841-850.
    • SWINBURN, K., HOWARD, D. and PORTER, G., 2005, Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) (Hove: Psychology Press).
    • VIGLIOCCO, G., VINSON, D. P., DRUKS, J., BARBER, H. and CAPPA, S. F., 2011, Nouns and verbs in the brain: a review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 407- 426.
    • WISENBURN, B. and MAHONEY, K., 2009, A meta-analysis of wordfinding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1338- 1352.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article