Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Griffiths, MD; Karanika-Murray, M (2012)
Publisher: Akadémiai Kiadó
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose:\ud Despite increasing empirical research into workaholism, no single definition or conceptualisation has emerged, and current understandings of workaholism are arguably problematic. The primary purpose of this paper is to clarify some of these issues, by defining and contextualising over-engagement in work that leads to severe negative consequences (i.e., workaholism) as a genuine behavioural addiction.\ud Approach:\ud By conceptualising work behaviours as manifestations of behavioural engagement and placing them on a continuum from withdrawal/under-engagement (e.g., persistent absenteeism) to over-engagement (e.g., work conflicting with all other activity), this paper argues that workaholism is an extreme negative aspect of behavioural engagement. It then examines the extent to which workaholism can be viewed as a genuine addiction by using criteria applied to other more traditional behavioural addictions (e.g., gambling addiction, exercise addiction), before briefly outlining an approach towards a more global understanding of workaholism.\ud Findings:\ud The framework presented here helps to contextualise over-engagement to work as a genuine addiction. It presents more comprehensive understanding of workaholism that takes into account the individual factors of the employee, situational factors of the working environment, and structural factors of the work activity itself. It provides theoretically derived links between workaholism and other work behaviours that can be empirically demonstrated. Practical implications: Viewing workaholism as an addiction that comprises extreme and prolonged behavioural over-engagement can be invaluable for promoting healthy work engagement. A clearer understanding of the underpinnings of workaholism can allow for a better assessment and management by practitioners.\ud Originality/value:\ud This paper is one the first to contextualise workaholism in relation to other work behaviours, conceptualise it as a genuine behavioural addiction, and to apply clinical criteria for addiction to under- stand workaholism as prolonged and extreme behavioural engagement.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andreassen, C. S., Hetland, J., Griffiths, M. & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Work Addiction Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 265-272.
    • Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organisation. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
    • Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 496-515.
    • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-60). New York: Academic Press.
    • Blustein, D. L. (2008). The role of work in psychological health and well-being: A conceptual, historical, and public policy perspective. American Psychologist, 63(4), 228-240.
    • Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L. & Ankenmann, R. D. (2000). The relationship of workaholism with work-life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469-477.
    • Burke, R. J. (1999). Workaholism in organizations: Gender differences. Sex Roles, 41, 333-345.
    • Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: Concepts, results and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 1-16.
    • Burke, R. J. & Matthiesen, S. (2004). Workaholism among Norwegian journalists: Antecedents and consequences. Stress and Health, 20, 301-308.
    • Byrne, D. G. & Reinhart, M. I. (1989). Work characteristics, occupational achievement and the Type A behaviour pattern. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 123-134.
    • Caverley, N., Cunningham, J. B. & MacGregor, J. N. (2007). Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 304-319.
    • Charlton, J. P. & Danforth, I. D. W. (2007). Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1531-1548.
    • Cook, D. R. (1987). Self-identified addictions and emotional disturbances in a sample of college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 1, 55-61.
    • de Bloom, J., Geurts, S. A., Sonnentag, S., Taris, T., de Weerth, C. & Kompier, M. A. (2011). How does a vacation from work affect employee health and well-being? Psychological Health, 26(11), 1606-1622.
    • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Geurts, S. A. E & Taris, T. W. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. In P. Perrewé & D. Ganster (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being (Vol. 7, pp. 85-123). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    • Doerfler, M. C. & Kammer, P. P. (1986). Workaholism, sex and sex-role stereotyping among female professionals. Sex Roles, 9, 551-560.
    • Edwards, J. R., Baglioni, A. J. & Cooper, C. L. (1990). Examining the relationships among self-report measures of the Type A behaviour pattern: The effects of dimensionality, measurement error, and differences in underlying constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 440-454.
    • Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D. & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
    • Fassel, D. (1990). Working Ourselves to Death: The High Costs of Workaholism and the Rewards of Recovery. London: Thorsons.
    • Flowers, C. & Robinson, B. E. (2002). A structural and discriminant analysis of the Work Addiction Risk Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 517-526.
    • Freimuth, M., Waddell, M., Stannard, J., Kelley, S., Kipper, A., Richardson, A. & Szuromi, I. (2008). Expanding the scope of dual diagnosis and co-addictions: Behavioral addictions. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery, 3, 137-160.
    • Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K. & Neal, A. (2008). Is behavioral engagement a distinct and useful construct? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 48-51.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent Gambling. London: Routledge.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 211-218.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2005a). A 'components' model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10, 191-197.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2005b). Workaholism is still a useful construct. Addiction Research and Theory, 13, 97-100.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2010). The role of context in online gaming excess and addiction: Some case study evidence. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 119-125.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Workaholism: A 21st century addiction. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 24, 740-744.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research. Addiction Research and Theory, 20, 111-124.
    • Griffiths, M. D., Szabo, A. & Terry, A. (2005). The Exercise Addiction Inventory: A quick and easy screening tool for health practitioners. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 30-31.
    • Hallberg, U. E. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). 'Same same' but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11(2), 119-127.
    • Harpaz, I. & Snir, R. (2003). Workaholism: Its definition and nature. Human Relations, 56(3), 291-319.
    • Hom, P. W., Tsui, A. S., Wu, J. B., Lee, T. W., Zhang, A. Y., Fu, P. P. & Li, L. (2009). Explaining employment relationships with social exchange and job embeddedness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 277-297.
    • Johns, G. (2001a). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31-42.
    • Johns, G. (2001b). The psychology of lateness, absenteeism, and turnover. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, J. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 2). London: Sage.
    • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386-408.
    • Kelman, H. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1, 51-60.
    • Killinger, B. (1992). Workaholics, the Respectable Addicts. East Roseville: Simon & Schuster.
    • Korn, E. R., Pratt, G. J. & Lambrou, P. T. (1987). Hyper-performances: The AIM Strategy for Releasing Your Business Potential. New York: Wiley.
    • Macey, W. H. & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 3-30.
    • Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living with Them, Working with Them. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • MacLaren, V. V. & Best, L. A. (2010). Multiple addictive behaviors in young adults: Student norms for the Shorter PROMIS Questionnaire. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 252-255.
    • Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Donovan, D. M. & Kivlahan, D. R. (1988). Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 233-252.
    • Matuska, K. M. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 104-111.
    • McMillan, L. H. W., O'Driscoll, M. P. & Burke, R. J. (2003). Workaholism: A review of theory, research, and future directions. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 167-190). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
    • Mitchell, T. & Lee, T. (2001). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover and job embeddedness: Foundations for a comprehensive theory of attachment. In B. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 189-246). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
    • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W. & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
    • Naughton, T. J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counselling and research. Career Development Quarterly, 5, 137-148.
    • Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L. & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: A conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 111-136.
    • Oates, W. (1971). Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction. New York: World.
    • O'Reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499.
    • Peiperl, M. & Jones, B. (2001). Workaholics and overworkers: Productivity or pathology? Group and Organization Management, 26, 369-393.
    • Persuad, R. (2004). Are you dependent on your work? BMJ Careers, 329, 36-37.
    • Porter, G. (1996). Organizational impact of workaholism: Suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70-84.
    • Porter, G. (2001). Workaholic tendencies and the high potential for stress among co-workers. International Journal of Stress Management, 8, 147-164.
    • Robinson, B. E. (1999). The Work Addiction Risk Test: Development of a tentative measure of workaholism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 199-210.
    • Rousseau, D. & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-13.
    • Scott, K. S., Moore, K. S. & Miceli, M. P. (1997). An exploration of the meaning and consequences of workaholism. Human Relations, 50, 287-314.
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A. & Taris, T. W. (2009). Being driven to work excessively hard: The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in The Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 320-348.
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Bakker, A. B. (2006). Doctor Jekyll or Mr Hyde? On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. Burke (Ed.), Research Companion to Working Time and Work Addiction (pp. 193-217). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout and engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 173-203.
    • Spence, J. T. & Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 160-178.
    • Sussman, S., Lisha, N. & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Prevalence of the addictions: A problem of the majority or the minority? Evaluation and the Health Professions, 34, 3-56.
    • Taris, T. W., Geurts, S. A. E., Schaufeli, W. B., Blonk, R. W. B. & Lagerveld, S. E. (2008). All day and all of the night: The relative contribution of two dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers. Work and Stress, 22, 153-165.
    • Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B. & Verhoeven, L. C. (2005). Workaholism in The Netherlands: Measurement and implications for job strain and work-nonwork conflict. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 37-60.
    • Terry, A., Szabo, A. & Griffiths, M. (2004). The Exercise Addiction Inventory: A new brief screening tool. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 489-499.
    • van Beek, I., Taris, T. W. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 468-482.
    • van Knippenberg, D., van Dick, R. & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 457-477.
    • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article