Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bastawrous, A; Silvester, A; Batterbury, M (2011)
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 4 Kasetsuwan N, Pangilinan RT, Moreira LL, DiMartino DS, Shah SS, Schallhorn SC, et al. Real time intraocular pressure and lamellar corneal flap thickness in keratomileusis. Cornea 2001;20:41-4.
    • 5 US Food and Drug Administration. LASIK. www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ ProductsandMedicalProcedures/SurgeryandLifeSupport/LASIK/ucm061270.htm.
    • 6 Ahn H, Kim JK, Kim CK, Han G, Seo K, Kim E, et al. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:349-57.
    • 7 Shortt AJ, Allan BDS. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;2:CD005135.
    • 8 Cui M, Chen X, Lu P. Comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J 2008;121:2331-5.
    • 9 Solomon K, Fernandez de Castro L, Sandoval H, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, et al. LASIK world literature review; quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology 2009;116:691-701.
    • 10 Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2002;109:175-87.
    • 11 Lindstrom RL, Hardten DR, Chu YR. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the treatment of low, moderate, and high myopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997;95:285-96.
    • 12 Siganos DS, Popescu CN, Siganos CS, Margaritis VN. Seven years experience with LASIK for myopia. Oftalmologia 1999;47:50-2.
    • 13 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Basic and clinical science course. Refractive Surgery 2006-2007. 2007:119.
    • 14 Chang M, Jain S, Azar D. Infections following laser in situ keratomileusis: an integration of the published literature. Surv Ophthalmol 2004;49:269-80.
    • 15 Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1647-54.
    • 16 McGee H, Mathers W. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis versus long-term contact lens wear: decision analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1860-7.
    • 17 Ambrosio R, Tervo T, Wilson S. LASIK-associated dry eye and neurotrophic epitheliopathy: pathophysiology and strategies for prevention and treatment. J Refract Surg 2008;24:396-407.
    • 18 De Paiva CS, Chen Z, Koch DD, Hamill MB, Manuel FK, Hassan SS, et al. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:438-45.
    • 19 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Photorefractive (laser) surgery for the correction of refractive errors. 2006. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/IPG164.
    • 20 Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Standards for laser refractive surgery. 2009. www. rcophth.ac.uk/page.asp?section=451§ionTitle=Clinical+Guideline.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article