LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Holden, J.; Burt, T.P. (2003)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Blanket peat catchments exhibit flashy regimes but little is known about the exact nature of runoff production processes within these catchments. Catchment, hillslope and plot-scale monitoring results are presented from the blanket peats of the northern Pennines, UK. Catchment efficiency for three study catchments with areas of 11.4 km(2), 0.83km(2) and 0.44 km(2) were 72 %, 77 % and 82 % respectively. Mean rainfall peak to discharge peak lag times were 2.7 hours, 2.1 hours and 3.2 hours respectively. Runoff from hillslopes in the catchments was gauged using runoff troughs. Mean hillslope lag times ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 hours and despite large differences in the scale of study there was little difference in response time. This indicates that slopes and channels are strongly hydrologically coupled in these peat systems. Saturation-excess overland flow dominates hillslope runoff, particularly on more gentle slopes, and on footslopes where overland flow occurs most frequently. Overall 81.5 % of the total overland flow and matrix throughflow collected by runoff troughs occurred at the peat surface, with 17.7 % between the surface and 5 cm depth, 0.7 % between 5 and 10 cm depth, and less than 0.1 % from below 10 cm depth, despite the thickness of the peat deposit. Most stormflow is produced as saturation-excess overland flow, whereas most low flow is produced by throughflow from 1 to 5 cm depth. Topography and preferential flow paths are important controls on the spatial pattern of runoff even on low-gradient peat. On steeper midslope regions, more flow occurs within the upper 10 cm of peat rather than at the surface. Preferential flow paths are identified at both the hillslope and plot-scale. Discharge deep within the peat is only produced from small macropore and pipe outlets that are well-connected to the peat surface. Response to rainfall from these macropore networks is rapid and they generate around 10 % of streamflow.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adamson, J. K., W. A. Scott, A. P. Rowland, and G. R. Beard. Ionic concentrations in a blanket peat bog in northern England and correlations with deposition and climate variables. European Journal of Soil Science, 52, 69-80, 2001.
    • Anderson, M. G. and T. P. Burt, Experimental investigations concerning the topographic control of soil water movement on hillslopes, Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, Supplementband 29, 52-63, 1978.
    • Atkinson, T.C., Techniques for measuring subsurface flow on hillslopes, in Hillslope Hydrology, edited by M.J. Kirkby, pp73-120, John Wiley, Chichester,1978.
    • Baird, A. J., C. Beckwith, and A. L. Heathwaite, Water movement in undamaged blanket peats, in Blanket Mire Degradation, Proceedings, edited by J. H. Tallis, R. Meade and P. D. Hulme, pp128-139, British Ecological Society, Manchester, 1997.
    • Bell, V. A. and R. J. Moore, An elevation-dependent snowmelt model for upland Britain. Hydrological Processes, 13, 1887-1903, 1999.
    • Brooks, S., and R. Stoneman.. Conserving Bogs: The Management Handbook. The Stationery Office Ltd. Edinburgh, 1997.
    • Brulisauer, A., and F. Klotzli. Notes on the restoration of fen meadows, ombrogenous bogs and rivers: definitions, techniques, problems. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH 64, 47-61, 1998.
    • Burt, T. P. A practical exercise to demonstrate the variable source area model, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 12, 177-186, 1988.
    • Burt, T. P. The role of wetlands in runoff generation from headwater catchments. In Hydrology and Hydrochemistry of British Wetlands, edited by J. M. R. Hughes and A. L. Heathwaite, pp21-38, John Wiley, Chichester, 1995.
    • Jones, J. A. A., Experimental studies of pipe hydrology, in R. Bryan and A. Yair, Badland Geomorphology, pp355-371, Geobooks, Norwich, 1982.
    • Khan, A. A. H. and C. K. Org, Design and calibration of tipping bucket system for field runoff and sediment quantification, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 52, 437-443, 1997.
    • Knapp, B. J., A system for field measurement of soil water movement. British Geomorphological Research Group Technical Bulletin, 9, 1973.
    • MacAlister, C. and G. Parkin, Towards a whole-system model for the hydrology of peat mires, in Patterned mires and mire pools: origin and development; flora and fauna, Proceedings, edited by V. Standen, J. H. Tallis and R. Meade, pp116-126, British Ecological Society, London, 1999.
    • Miller, J. D., J. K. Adamson, and D. Hirst, Trends in stream water quality in Environmental Change Network upland catchments: the first 5 years. The Science of the Total Environment, 265, 27-38, 2001.
    • Price, J. S. Blanket bog in Newfoundland: Part 2. Hydrological processes, Journal of Hydrology, 135, 103-119, 1992.
    • Rycroft, D. W, D. J. A. Williams and H. A. P. Ingram, The transmission of water through peat: I Review, Journal of Ecology, 63, 535-556, 1975.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article