LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pothos, E. M.; Calitri, R.; Tapper, K.; Brunstrom, J. M.; Rogers, P. J. (2009)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, R1
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/acp.1506
Consumption of and/or abstinence from substances with a high reward value (e.g., heroin, marijuana, alcohol, nicotine, certain foods) are associated with cognitive biases for information related to the substance. Such cognitive biases are important since they may contribute to difficulties in controlling intake of the substance. We examine cognitive biases for stimuli related to food. For the first time, we concurrently employ and compare five conceptually distinct measures of cognitive bias (dot probe, emotional Stroop, recognition, EAST, explicit attitudes). Contrary to expectations from current theory, the relation between the cognitive measures was weak and evident only in certain subsets of the population sample, as defined by gender and emotional-, restrained-, and external-eating characteristics of our participants. We discuss some methodological implications of our findings.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bellezza, F. S., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1986), Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18, 299-303.
    • Boon, B., Vogelzang, L. & Jansen, A. (2000). Do restrained eaters show attention toward or away from food, shape and weight stimuli? European Eating Disorders Review, 8, 51-58.
    • Boyer, M., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: Automaticity in a gambling-specific modified Stroop task. Addiction, 98(1), 61- 70.
    • Cox, W. M., & Klinger, E. (2004). A motivational model of alcohol use: Determinants of use and change. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 121-138). Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
    • Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations, Psychological Bulletin, 132, 443-476.
    • Cox, W. M., Pothos, E. M., & Hosier, S. G. (2007). Cognitive-Motivational Predictors of Excessive Drinkers' Success in Changing. Psychopharmacology, 192, 499-510 Cox, W. M., Hogan, L. M., Kristian, M. R., & Race, J. H. (2002). Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers' treatment outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(3), 237-243.
    • Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing. A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
    • De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
    • Drayna, D. (2005). Human taste genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 6, 217-235.
    • Duka, T. & Townshend, J. M. (2004). The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology, 176, 353-361.
    • Egloff, B. & Hock, M. (2003). Assessing attention allocation toward threat-related stimuli: a comparison of the emotional Stroop task and the attentional probe task. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 475-483.
    • Field, M. (2006). Attentional biases in drug abuse and addiction: cognitive mechanisms, causes, consequences, and implications. In: M. R. Munafo & I. P.
    • Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Wright, A., Kouvaraki, M., & Duka, T. (2007a). The role of drug expectancy in the control of human drug seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behaviour Processes, 33, 484-496.
    • Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Austin, A., Brown, C., & Duka, T. (2007b). Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: the role of uncertainly. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
    • Johansson, L., Ghaderi, A., & Andersson, G. (2004). The role of sensitivity to external food cues in attentional allocation to food words on dot probe and Strop tasks. Eating Behaviors, 5, 261-271.
    • Jones, B. T. & Schulze, D. (2000). Alcohol-related words of positive affect are more accessible in social drinkers' memory than other words when sip-primed by alcohol. Addiction Research, 8, 221-232.
    • Logan, G. D. (1998). What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24(6), 1720-1736.
    • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A, & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15-20.
    • MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
    • McKenna, F. P., & Sharma, D. (1995). Intrusive cognitions: an investigation of the emotional Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1595-1607.
    • Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 36, 809-848.
    • Overduin, J., Jansen, A., & Louwerse, E. (1995). Stroop interference and food intake. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18, 277-285.
    • Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 324- 354.
    • Pecina, S., Schulkin, J., & Berridge, K. C. (2006). Nucleus accumbens corticotropinreleasing factor increases cue-triggered motivation for sucrose reward: paradoxical positive incentive effects in stress? BMC Biology, 4, 1-16.
    • Peretti, C. S. (1998). Anxiété et troubles cognitifs [Anxiety and cognition disorders]. Encephale, 24, 256-259.
    • Posner, M. I., Rafal., R. D., Choate, L., & Vaughn, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
    • Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of Artificial Grammar Learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227-244.
    • Pothos, E. M., & Cox, W. M. (2002). Cognitive bias for alcohol-related information in inferential processes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 66, 235-241.
    • Rafal, R., Davies, J., & Lauder, J. (2006). Inhibitory tagging at subsequently fixated locations: Generation of “inhibition of return” without saccade inhibition. Visual Cognition, 13, 308-323.
    • Rather, B. C., Goldman, M. S., Roehrich, L., Brannick, M. (1992). Empirical modeling of an alcohol expectancy memory network using multidimensional scaling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 173-183.
    • Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of craving: An incentivesensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291.
    • Stacy, A. W. (1997). Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 61-73.
    • Stetter, F., Ackerman, C., Bizer, A., Straube, E. R., & Mann, K. (1995). Effects of disease-related cues in alcoholic inpatients: Results of a controlled “alcohol Stroop” study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 19, 593-599.
    • Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147-168.
    • Tipper, S. P. (1985). The Negative Priming Effect :Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
    • Tipper, S. P. & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
    • Tzelgov, J. (1997). Specifying the relations between automaticity and conscious: A theoretical note. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 441-451.
    • Van Strien T. (1997). The concurrent validity of a classification of dieters with low versus high susceptibility toward failure of restraint. Addictive Behaviors, 22, 587-597.
    • Van Strien, T., Frijters, J.E.R., Bergers, G.P.A. & Defares, P.B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295- 315.
    • Waters, H., & Green, M. W. (2003). A demonstration of attentional bias, using a novel dual task paradigm, towards clinically salient material in recovering alcohol abuse patients? Psychological Medicine, 33, 491-498.
    • Wiers, R. W., Cox, W. M., Field, M., Fadardi, J. S., Palfai, T. P., Schoenmakers, T., & Stacy, A. W. (2006). The search for new ways to change alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 320-331.
    • Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 3-24.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article