Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Karavasilis, Theodore L. (2016)
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: TH
Previous research showed that steel moment-resisting frames (MRFs) with viscous dampers may experience column plastic hinges under strong earthquakes and highlighted the need to further assess the efficiency of capacity design rules. To partially address this need, three alternatives of a prototype building having five, 10 and 20 stories are designed according to Eurocode 8 using either steel MRFs or steel MRFs with dampers. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is conducted for all MRFs and their collapse resistance and plastic mechanism is evaluated. The results show that steel MRFs with dampers are prone to column plastic hinging in comparison to steel MRFs. The steel MRFs with dampers are then iteratively re-designed with stricter capacity design rules to achieve a plastic mechanism that is approximately similar to that of steel MRFs. The performance of these re-designed steel MRFs with dampers indicates, that overall, enforcement of stricter capacity design rules for columns is not justified neither from a collapse resistance or a reparability perspective.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Clifton C, Bruneau M, MacRae G, Leon R, Fussel R. Steel structures damage from the Christchurch earthquake series of 2010 and 2011. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 2011; 44(4):297-318.
    • 2. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A. Principles of passive supplemental damping and isolation. IUSS press 2006.
    • 3. Symans M, Charney F, Whittaker A, Constantinou M, Kircher C, Johnson M, McNamara R. Energy Dissipation Systems for Seismic Applications: Current Practice and Recent Developments. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 2008; 134(1):3-21.
    • 4. Seleemah A, Constantinou MC. Investigation of seismic response of buildings with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. Report No. NCEER 97-0004, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y., 1997.
    • 5. Karavasilis TL, Seo C-Y. Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems. Engineering Structures 2011; 33: 2248-2258.
    • 6. Hatzigeorgiou GD, Papagiannopoulos GA. Inelastic velocity ratio. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012; 41(14):2025-2041.
    • 7. Tubaldi E, Ragni L, Dall'Asta A. Probabilistic seismic response of linear systems equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2015; 44(1):101-120.
    • 8. Dall'Asta A, Tubaldi E, Ragni L. Influence of the nonlinear behavior of viscous dampers on the seismic demand hazard of building frames. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2016; 45(1):149-169.
    • 9. Pavlou E, Constantinou MC. Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping systems. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 2006; 132(7):1108-1117.
    • 10. Wanitkorkul A, Filiatrault A. Influence of passive supplemental damping systems on structural and nonstructural seismic fragilities of a steel building. Engineering Structures 2008; 30(3):675-682.
    • 11. Kasai K, Motoyui S, Ozaki H, Ishii M, Ito H, Kajiwara K, Hikino T. Full-scale tests of passively-controlled 5-story steel building using E-Defense shake table. Part 1: Test concept, method, and building specimen. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on behaviour of steel structures in seismic areas. Philadelphia, PA, 2009.
    • 12. Dong B, Sause R, Ricles JM. Seismic response and performance of a steel MRF building with nonlinear viscous dampers under DBE and MCE. . Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 2016; in press
    • 13. ASCE 7-10. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2010.
    • 14. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Gomez JD, Whittaker AS, Chrysostomou CZ. Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis of yielding structures with damping systems. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(3):501-530.
    • 15. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kircher CA, Chrysostomou CZ. Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(3):531-547.
    • 16. Guo, JWW., Christopoulos, C. (2013), “Performance Spectra-based Design Method for the Seismic Design of Structures Equipped with Passive Supplemental Damping Systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(6), 935-952
    • 17. Seo C-Y, Karavasilis TL, Ricles JM, Sause R. Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2014; 43(14):2135-2154.
    • 18. Balut N, Gioncu V. Suggestion for an improved 'dog-bone' solution. 4th International Conference STESSA, Naples, Italy; 2003.
    • 19. Baiguera M, Vasdravellis G, Karavasilis TL. Dual seismic-resistant steel frame with high post-yield stiffness energy-dissipative braces for residual drift reduction. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2016; 122:198-212.
    • 20. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C. A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.
    • 21. Eurocode 8. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. 2004
    • 22. Lin W, Chopra A. Earthquake Response of Elastic Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems with Nonlinear Viscoelastic Dampers. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2003; 129(6):597-606.
    • 23. Whittaker A, Constantinou M, Ramirez O, Johnson M, Chrysostomou C. Equivalent Lateral Force and Modal Analysis Procedures of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions for Buildings with Damping Systems. Earthquake Spectra 2003; 19(4):959-980.
    • 24. Whittle J, Williams MS, Karavasilis TL, Blakeborough A. A comparison of viscous damper placement methods for improving seismic building design. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2012; 16:540-560.
    • 25. OpenSees. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2013.
    • 26. Newell J, Uang C-M. Cyclic behaviour of steel columns with combined high axial load and drift demand. Report No. SSRP-06/22. Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, 2006.
    • 27. Lignos DG, Krawinkler H. Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 2011; 137(11):1291-1302.
    • 28. Krawinkler H. Shear design of steel frame joints. Engineering Journal AISC 1978; 15(2):82-91.
    • 29. Miyamoto HK, Gilani AS, Wada A, Ariyaratana C. Limit states and failure mechanisms of viscous dampers and the implications for large earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010; 39(11):1279-1297.
    • 30. Taylor Devices inc. Accessible to http://www.taylordevices.com.
    • 31. FEMA. Quantification of building seismic performance factors, FEMA P695 Report. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009.
    • 32. Freddi F, Padgett JE, Dall'Asta A. Probabilistic seismic demand modeling of local level response parameters of an RC frame. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2016; DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-9948-x
    • 33. Freddi F, Tubaldi E, Ragni L, Dall'Asta A. Probabilistic performance assessment of low-ductility reinforced concrete frames retrofitted with dissipative braces. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2013; 42(7): 993-1011.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article