Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Li, Jun; Paul, Manosh C.; Czajka, Krzysztof M. (2016)
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, Physics::Chemical Physics, Physics::Plasma Physics
To realize large percentage biomass co-firing with coal in existing coal-fired boilers, the combustion behaviour of biomass is expected to be similar or comparable to that of coal. When co-firing with coal, biomass is not necessarily to be ground as fine as the dedicated coal particles due to its higher reactivity. With aim of achieving promising performance of co-firing with dedicated coal particles, the determination of suitable particle size of biomass becomes important. The paper investigates experimentally the ignition behaviour of three biomass materials in a down-fire reactor associated with thermogravimetric analyser (TGA). TGA results showed that the devolatilization process is accelerated by the presence of oxygen, but failed to identify the impacts of particle size on the ignition behaviour of biomass. However, the ignition testing results based in the down-fire reactor clearly showed that ignition delay time of a large biomass particle is longer than that of smaller one. In addition, being injected into the furnace, the softwood particles take a longer residence time to be ignited than the straw particles at same sizes, which agrees well with their reactivity analysis in TGA. Moreover, the ignition test results suggested that the ignition mechanism of biomass could be alternated from homogeneous to the heterogeneous ignition when the furnace temperature is increasing; at high enough furnace temperatures, the ignition predictably occurs at the particle surface without requiring the start of devolatilization. The results quantitatively demonstrate the effects of particle size on the ignition delay time of biomass, which, together with the transport phenomena and surrounding atmosphere, can contribute to control the biomass combustion profile and co-firing performance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • (1) https://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/ IRENA-ETSAP%20Tech%20Brief%20E21%20Biomass%20Co-firing.
    • (2) Zhang, D.-k.; Wall, T. F. An analysis of the ignition of coal dust clouds. Combust. Flame 1993, 92, 475−480.
    • (3) Katalambula, H.; Hayashi, J.-i.; Chiba, T.; Kitano, K.; Ikeda, K.
    • Dependence of Single Coal Particle Ignition Mechanism on the Surrounding Volatile Matter Cloud. Energy Fuels 1997, 11, 1033− 1039.
    • (4) Grotkjaer, T.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Jensen, A. D.; Glarborg, P. An experimental study of biomass ignition. Fuel 2003, 82, 825−833.
    • (5) Jones, J. M.; Saddawi, A.; Dooley, B.; Mitchell, E. J. S.; Werner, J.; Waldron, D. J. Low temperature ignition of biomass. Fuel Process.
    • Technol. 2015, 134, 372−377.
    • (6) Riaza, J.; Álvarez, L.; Gil, M. V.; Khatami, R.; Levendis, Y. A.; Pis, J. J.; et al. Ignition behavior of coal and biomass blends under oxyfiring conditions with steam additions. Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol.
    • (7) Toptas, A.; Yildirim, Y.; Duman, G.; Yanik, J. Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 177, 328−336.
    • (8) Li, J.; Brzdekiewicz, A.; Yang, W.; Blasiak, W. Co-firing based on biomass torrefaction in a pulverized coal boiler with aim of 100% fuel switching. Appl. Energy 2012, 99, 344−354.
    • (9) Liu, Y.; Geier, M.; Molina, A.; Shaddix, C. R. Pulverized coal stream ignition delay under conventional and oxy-fuel combustion conditions. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5, S36−S46.
    • (10) Goshayeshi, B.; Sutherland, J. C. A comparison of various models in predicting ignition delay in single-particle coal combustion.
    • Combust. Flame 2014, 161, 1900−1910.
    • (11) Trabadela, I. Ignition of suspensions of coal and biomass particles in air and oxy-fuel for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and climate change mitigation; Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K., 2015.
    • (12) Wang, C. a.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Che, D. Pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of coals in oxyfuel combustion. Appl. Energy 2012, 97, 264−273.
    • (13) Wang, C.; Wang, F.; Yang, Q.; Liang, R. Thermogravimetric studies of the behavior of wheat straw with added coal during combustion. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 50−56.
    • (14) Fan, Y.-s.; Zou, Z.; Cao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, X. Ignition Characteristics of Pulverized Coal under High Oxygen Concentrations. Energy Fuels 2008, 22, 892−897.
    • (15) Li, J.; Paul, M. C.; Younger, P. L.; Watson, I.; Hossain, M.; Welch, S. Prediction of high-temperature rapid combustion behaviour of woody biomass particles. Fuel 2016, 165, 205−214.
    • (16) Arenillas, A.; Rubiera, F.; Arias, B.; Pis, J. J.; Fauńdez, J. M.; Gordon, A. L.; et al. A TG/DTA study on the effect of coal blending on ignition behaviour. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2004, 76, 603−614.
    • (17) Biagini, E.; Barontini, F.; Tognotti, L. Devolatilization of Biomass Fuels and Biomass Components Studied by TG/FTIR Technique. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 4486−4493.
    • (18) Lemmon, E. W.; Huber, M. L. NIST Standard Reference Database 23; NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database (REFPROP): Version 9.1; National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST): Gaithersburg, MD, 2013.
    • (19) Lemmon, E. W.; Jacobsen, R. T. Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity Equations for Nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, and Air. Int. J.
    • Thermophys. 2004, 25, 21−69.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article