Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Marchall, C; Brereton, OP
Publisher: ACM
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Riaz, M., Sulayman, M., Salleh, N., & Mendes, E. (2010). Experiences conducting systematic reviews from novices‟ perspective. In Proceedings. of EASE Vol. 10, pp. 1-10.
    • [2] Babar, M. A., & Zhang, H. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: Preliminary results from interviews with researchers. In Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 346-355.
    • [3] Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 571-583.
    • [4] Carver, J. C., Hassler, E., Hernandes, E., & Kraft, N. A. (2013). Identifying Barriers to the Systematic Literature Review Process. In Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 203-212). IEEE.
    • [5] Tsafnat, G., Dunn, A., Glasziou, P., & Coiera, E. (2013). The automation of systematic reviews. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 346
    • [6] Felizardo, K. R., MacDonell, S. G., Mendes, E., & Maldonado, J. C. (2012). A systematic mapping on the use of visual data mining to support the conduct of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Software, 7(2), 450-461..
    • [7] Marshall, C., & Brereton, P. (2013). Tools to Support Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering: A Mapping Study. In Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 296-299).
    • [8] Marshall, C., Brereton, P., & Kitchenham, B. (2014). Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: A feature analysis. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (p. 13). ACM.
    • [9] Staples, M., & Niazi, M. (2007). Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1425- 1437
    • [10] Lethbridge, T. C., Sim, S. E., & Singer, J. (2005). Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies. Empirical software engineering, 10(3), 311-341.
    • [11] Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (1997). Qualitative research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21, 241-242.
    • [12] Robson, C. (2002). Real word research. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • [13] Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications.
    • [14] Miles, M. B, Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.
    • [15] Clough, P., & methodology. Sage.
    • Nutbrown, C. (2012). A student's guide to
    • [16] Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill International.
    • [17] Gomm, R. (2004). Social research methodology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article