LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Grainger, Catherine; Williams, David M.; Lind, Sophie E. (2016)
Publisher: Springer US
Journal: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC, Judgment of learning, Memory, BF, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Theory of mind, Metacognition, Mindreading, Metamemory, Original Paper, Autism
This study explored whether adults and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate difficulties making metacognitive judgments, specifically judgments of learning. Across two experiments, the study examined whether individuals with ASD could accurately judge whether they had learnt a piece of information (in this case word pairs). In Experiment 1, adults with ASD demonstrated typical accuracy on a standard ‘cue-alone’ judgment of learning (JOL) task, compared to age- and IQ-matched neurotypical adults. Additionally, in Experiment 2, adolescents with ASD demonstrated typical accuracy on both a standard ‘cue-alone’ JOL task, and a ‘cue-target’ JOL task. These results suggest that JOL accuracy is unimpaired in ASD. These results have important implications for both theories of metacognition in ASD and educational practise.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    • Baguley, T. (2004). Understanding statistical power in the context of applied research. Applied Ergonomics, 35, 73-80.
    • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17. doi:10.1023/A:1005653411471.
    • Bastin, C., Feyers, D., Souchay, C., Guillaume, B., Pepin, J. L., Lemaire, C., et al. (2012). Frontal and posterior cingulate metabolic impairment in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia with impaired autonoetic consciousness. Human Brain Mapping, 33(6), 1268-1278. doi:10.1002/hbm.21282.
    • Bowler, D., Gaigg, S., & Lind, S. E. (2011). Memory in autism: Binding, self, and brain. In I. Roth & P. Rezaie (Eds.), Researching the autism spectrum: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 316-346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bowler, D. M., Matthews, N. J., & Gardiner, J. M. (1997). Asperger's syndrome and memory: Similarity to autism but not amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 35, 65-70.
    • Brosnan, M., Johnson, H., Grawemeyer, B., Chapman, E., Antoniadou, K., & Hollinworth, M. (2015). Deficits in metacognitive monitoring in mathematics assessments in learners with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 20(40), 463-472. doi:10.1177/ 1362361315589477.
    • Brunsdon, V. E. A., & Happe´, F. (2014). Exploring the 'fractionation' of autism at the cognitive level. Autism, 18(1), 17-30. doi:10. 1177/1362361313499456.
    • Carruthers, P. (2009). How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(2), 121-138.
    • Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe´, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(Pt 8), 1839-1849. doi:10. 1093/brain/awf189.
    • Chua, E. F., Schacter, D. L., & Sperling, R. A. (2009). Neural correlates of metamemory: A comparison of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(9), 1751-1765. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21123.
    • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33(33), 497-505. doi:10.1080/146407481 08400805.
    • Constantino, J. N., Davis, S. A., Todd, R. D., Schindler, M. K., Gross, M. M., Brophy, S. L., et al. (2003). Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: Comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interviewrevised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(4), 427-433. doi:10.1023/A:1025014929212.
    • Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psycholology, 5, 781. doi:10.3389/fpsyg. 2014.00781.
    • Do Lam, A. T., Axmacher, N., Fell, J., Staresina, B. P., Gauggel, S., Wagner, T., et al. (2012). Monitoring the mind: The neurocognitive correlates of metamemory. PLoS ONE, 7(1), e30009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030009.
    • Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1997). Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52, 178-186.
    • Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 374-380. doi:10.3758/ BF03210921.
    • Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 34-49. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2476.
    • Estes, A., Rivera, V., Bryan, M., Cali, P., & Dawson, G. (2011). Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1044-1052. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1127-3.
    • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.
    • Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 732-764. doi:10.2307/2281536.
    • Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2014). Metacognition, metamemory, and mindreading in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(3), 650-659. doi:10.1037/a0036531.
    • Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2016). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes in children with autism spectrum disorder: Diminished judgement of confidence accuracy. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 65-74. doi:10.1016/j. concog.2016.03.003.
    • Hartwig, M. K., Was, C. A., Isaacson, R. M., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). General knowledge monitoring as a predictor of in-class exam performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 456-468.
    • Hill, E. L., Berthoz, S., & Frith, U. (2004). Brief report: Cognitive processing of own emotions in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder and in their relatives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 229-235. doi:10.1023/B:Jadd. 0000022613.41399.14.
    • Jones, C. R. G., Happe´, F., Golden, H., Marsden, A. J. S., Tregay, J., Simonoff, E., et al. (2009). Reading and arithmetic in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Peaks and dips in attainment. Neuropsychology, 23(6), 718-728. doi:10.1037/ a0016360.
    • Kao, Y. C., Davis, E. S., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2005). Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation. Nature Neuroscience, 8(12), 1776-1783. doi:10.1038/nn1595.
    • Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver, C. A. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 92-107. doi:10.3758/BF03211579.
    • Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622. doi:0. 1037/0278-7393.32.3.609.
    • Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
    • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205-223. doi:10.1023/A:1005592401947.
    • McMahon, C., Henderson, H., Newell, L., Jamie, M., & Mundy, P. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of facial affect in higherfunctioning children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(3), 882-898. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2630-3.
    • Mervis, C. B., & Klein-Tasman, B. P. (2004). Methodological issues in group-matching designs: alpha levels for control variable comparisons and measurement characteristics of control and target variables. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(1), 7-17. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000018069.69562.b8.
    • Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 463-477. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001.
    • Perner, J., Aichhorn, M., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., & Ladurner, G. (2006). Thinking of mental and other representations: The roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction. Social Neuroscience, 1(3-4), 245-258. doi:10.1080/17470910600989896.
    • Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356-374.
    • Samson, D., Apperly, A., Chiavarino, C., & Humphreys, G. (2004). Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nature Neuroscience, 7(5), 499-500. doi:10.1038/Nn1223.
    • Sawyer, A. C., Williamson, P., & Young, R. (2014). Metacognitive processes in emotion recognition: are they different in adults with Asperger's disorder? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(6), 1373-1382. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1999-0.
    • Saxe, R., & Powell, L. J. (2006). It's the thought that counts: Specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17(8), 692-699. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006. 01768.x.
    • Silani, G., Bird, G., Brindley, R., Singer, T., Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2008). Levels of emotional awareness and autism: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 97-112. doi:10.1080/ 17470910701577020.
    • Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221. doi:10.1037/278-7393.26.1.204.
    • Song, C., Kanai, R., Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2011). Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1787-1792. doi:10.1016/j. concog.2010.12.011.
    • Souchay, C., & Isingrini, M. (2012). Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults. Acta Psychologica, 139(3), 458-464.
    • Souchay, C., Isingrini, M., Clarys, D., Taconnat, L., & Eustache, F. (2004). Executive functioning and judgment-of-learning versus feeling-of-knowing in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 30(1), 47-62.
    • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66-73. doi:10.1037/ 0022-0663.95.1.66.
    • Thiede, K. W., & Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of self regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and selfpaced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1024-1037. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.25.4.1024.
    • Wilkinson, D. A., Best, C. A., Minshew, N. J., & Strauss, M. S. (2010). Memory awareness for faces in individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(11), 1371-1377. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0995-x.
    • Williams, D. M., & Happe´, F. (2009). What did I say? Versus what did I think? Attributing false beliefs to self amongst children with and without autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(6), 865-873. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6.
    • Wojcik, D. Z., Moulin, C. J., & Souchay, C. (2013). Metamemory in children with autism: exploring ''feeling-of-knowing'' in episodic and semantic memory. Neuropsychology, 27(1), 19-27. doi:10.1037/a0030526.
    • Wojcik, D. Z., Waterman, A. H., Lestie, C., Moulin, C. J., & Souchay, C. (2014). Metacognitive judgments-of-learning in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 18(4), 393-408. doi:10. 1177/1362361313479453.
    • Woodbury-Smith, M., Robinson, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). Screening adults for Asperger syndrome using the AQ: Diagnostic validity in clinical practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3), 331-335. doi:10.1007/s10803- 005-3300-7.
    • World Heath Organisation. (1993). International classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines (10th ed.). Geneva: World Heath Organisation.
    • Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 283-307. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.3.283.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    67
    67%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article