Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kadiyala, Suneetha (2004)
Types: Book
Subjects: Scaling-up ,Collective action ,
"This paper discusses the factors that enabled and constrained the scaling up of a multisectoral poverty alleviation program called Kudumbashree, initiated by the government of Kerala (GOK), India, in 1998 to eradicate poverty by 2008. It also discusses some potential threats to and trade-offs of scaling up Kudumbashree. This report draws primarily upon the available literature and qualitative data collected during a five-day visit to Kudumbashree in March 2003....Our findings show that an enabling environment, especially decentralization and the concurrent devolution of finances to the local government bodies (LGBs), was critical in scaling up Kudumbashree. The CDS structures are now considered as a further step to decentralization. As the CDS structures are affiliated to the LGBs, their financial sustainability is ensured through various modalities, e.g., convergence, women's component plan, and earmarked assistance to women's self-help groups (SHG). The unique context of Kerala, coupled with leadership of a few motivated and innovative officials, was key in both the decentralization and scaling-up process." Authors' Abstract
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anand, S. J. 2002. Self-help groups in empowering women: Case study of selected SHGs and NHGs. Discussion Paper No. 38. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India: Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies.
    • Bablu, J. S. 2002. Parties, communal bodies ‘hijack’ SHG concept. The Hindu.
    • Census of India. 2001. http://www.censusindia.net/cgi-bin/census/census_report/ showstate.cgi
    • Gopalan, S., R. Bhupathy, and H. Raja. 1995. Appraisal of success factors in nutrition relevant programs: A case study of Alappuzha community-based nutrition programme. Chennai: United Nations Children’s Fund.
    • Isaac, T. M. 2001. Campaign for democratic decentralization in Kerala. Social Scientist 29 (340-341): 8-47.
    • Isaac, T. M. I., M. Williams, Pinaki Chakraborthy, and B. V. Thampi. 2002. Women neighborhood groups: Towards a new perspective. Paper presented at the Seminar on Decentralisation, Sustainable Development and Social Security, organized by the Joint Committee of Panchayats of Aryad and Kanjikuzhy Blocks and the International Labour Organisation. Mararikulam, Kerala, India.
    • Kudumbashree. 2002. Kudumbashree: An innovative women’s initiative in poverty reduction. PowerPoint presentation. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • ________. 2003. Kudumbashree: Concept, organization and activities. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • Kurian, G. 1998. Empowering conditions in the decentralization process—An analysis of dynamics, factors and actors in Panchyati Raj Institutions from West Bengal and Karnataka, India. Bhubaneswar: Centre for Policy Research and Advocacy.
    • Nair, G. 2000. People’s planning: The Kerala experience. Discussion Paper No. 16. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India: Kerala Research Programme on Local Level Development, Centre for Development Studies.
    • Oommen, M. A. 1999. The community development society of Kerala. New Delhi: Institute of Social Sciences.
    • Sharma, M. P. 2004. Community-driven development and scaling-up of microfinance services: Case studies from Nepal and India. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 178. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    • State Planning Board. 2001. Economic review. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • ________. 2002. Economic review. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2003. Kerala: Human development fact sheet. Geneva.
    • Vernon, R. 2001. The ‘new’ Kerala model: Lessons for sustainable development. World Development 29 (4): 601-617.
    • Kudumbashree. 2001. Annual report 1999-2000. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • ________. 2003. Annual report 2000-2001. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
    • Stuart Gillespie, September 2003
    • Paolisso, Kelly Hallman, Lawrence Haddad, and Shibesh Regmi, April 2001
    • Klemesu, Daniel Maxwell, and Saul S. Morris, April 1999
    • Sylvie Lambert, and Elisabeth Sadoulet, October 1997
    • Pooling, and Social Cohesion in Madagascar, Manfred Zeller, May 1996
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article