Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Opoku-Anokye, Stephen; Tang, Yinshan (2013)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Current methods and techniques used in designing organisational performance measurement systems do not consider the multiple aspects of business processes or the semantics of data generated during the lifecycle of a product. In this paper, we propose an organisational performance measurement systems design model that is based on the semantics of an organisation, business process and products lifecycle. Organisational performance measurement is examined from academic and practice disciplines. The multi-discipline approach is used as a research tool to explore the weaknesses of current models that are used to design organisational performance measurement systems. This helped in identifying the gaps in research and practice concerning the issues and challenges in designing information systems for measuring the performance of an organisation. The knowledge sources investigated include on-going and completed research project reports; scientific and management literature; and practitioners’ magazines.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beynon-Davies, P. 2002. Information Systems: an introduction to informatics in organisations, Palgrave.
    • Chandler, D. 2007. Semiotics: the basics, Abingdon, UK, Routledge.
    • Cima 2005. CIMA official terminology, CIMA Publishing.
    • Clearinghouse, I. 2005. Interoperability clearinghouse glossary of terms. Retrieved January, 29, 2006.
    • Commerce, O. O. G. 2005. Managing successful projects with PRINCE2, Norwich, UK, The Stationery Office.
    • Daft, R. L. 2009. Organization theory and design, South-Western Pub.
    • Davenport, T. H. and Short, J. E. 2003. Information technology and business process redesign. Operations management: critical perspectives on business and management, 1, 1-27.
    • Deangelo, L. E. 1988. Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance* 1:: The use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10, 3-36.
    • Demski, J. S. 1998. Performance Measure Manipulation*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 261-285.
    • Fisher, C. and Downes, B. 2008. Performance measurement and metric manipulation in the public sector. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 245-258.
    • Gazedam, H. W. M. 2004. Organizational semiotics: A state of the art report. Semiotix 1. Retrieved January, 29.
    • Hopper, T., Scapens, R. W. and Northcott, D. 2007. Issues in management accounting, Pearson Education.
    • Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M. and Wang, R. Y. 2002. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Communications of the ACM, 45, 184-192.
    • Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard business review, 70, 71-79.
    • Laudon, K. C., Laudon, J. P. and Prentice-Hall, I. 2011. Essentials of management information systems, Prentice Hall.
    • Liu, K. 2000. Semiotics in information systems engineering, Cambridge Univ Pr.
    • Liu, K. 2002. Coordination and communication using signs, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    • Lord, R. G. and Maher, K. J. 1994. Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance, Psychology Press.
    • Parmenter, D. 2009. Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs, Wiley.
    • Performance, T. C. F. B. 2009. Literature Review on Performance Measurement and Management. Cranfield School of Management.
    • Smith, H. 2005. From CIO to CPO via BPM: The Next Generation of Enterprise. Retrieved January, 29.
    • Stamper, R. K. 1973. Information in business and administrative system, New York, USA, John Wiley and Sons.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article