LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dimitrova, D. S.; Haberman, S.; Kaishev, V. K. (2013)
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HB
The dependent competing risks model of human mortality is considered, assuming that the dependence between lifetimes is modelled by a multivariate copula function. The effect on the overall survival of removing one or more causes of death is explored under two alternative definitions of removal, ignoring the causes and eliminating them. Under the two definitions of removal, expressions for the overall survival functions in terms of the specified copula (density) and the net (marginal) survival functions are given. The net survival functions are obtained as a solution to a system of non-linear differential equations, which relates them through the specified copula (derivatives) to the crude (sub-) survival functions, estimated from data. The overall survival functions in a model with four competing risks, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases and all other causes grouped together, have been implemented and evaluated, based on cause-specific mortality data for England and Wales published by the Office for National Statistics, for the year 2007. We show that the two alternative definitions of removal of a cause of death have different effects on the overall survival and in particular on the life expectancy at birth and at age 65, when one, two or three of the competing causes are removed. An important conclusion is that the eliminating definition is better suited for practical use in competing risks’ applications, since it is more intuitive, and it suffices to consider only positive dependence between the lifetimes which is not the case under the alternative ignoring definition.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bowers, N.L., Gerber, H.U., Hickman, J.C., Jones, D.A., and Nesbitt, C.J. (1997). Actuarial Mathematics. Itasca, III: Society of Actuaries.
    • Bryant, J. and Dignam, J.J. (2004). Semiparametric Models for Cumulative Incidence Functions. Biometrics, 60, 182-190.
    • Buettner, T. (2004). Approaches and experiences in projecting mortality patterns for oldest-old. North American Actuarial Journal, 6 (3), 14-29.
    • Carriere, J. (1994). Dependent Decrement Theory. Transactions, Society of Actuaries, v. XLVI, 45-65.
    • Carriere, J. (1995). Removing Cancer when it is Correlated with other Causes of Death. Biometrical Journal, 3, 339-350.
    • Chen, Y. (2010). Semiparametric marginal regression analysis for dependent competing risks under an assumed copula. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 72, Part 2, 235-251.
    • Cherubini, U., Luciano, E. and Vecchiato, W. (2004). Copula methods in nance. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
    • Gaynor, J.J., Feuer, E.J., Tan, C.C., Wu, D.H., Little, C.R., Straus, D.J., Clarkson, B.D., Brennan, M.F. (1993). On the use of cause-specific failure time and conditional failure probabilities: examples from clinical oncology data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 88, 400-409.
    • Gooley, T.A., Leisenring, W., Crowley, J., Storer, B. (1999). Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representation of old estimators. Stat Med, 18, 695-706.
    • Honor´e, B. E. and Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). Bounds in competing risks models and the war on cancer. Econometrica, 74, 4 , 1675-1698.
    • Hooker, P.F. and Longley-Cook, L.H. (1957). Life and other Contingencies. Vol. II. Cambridge, Great Britain: University Press.
    • Jeong, J. and Fine, J.P. (2007). Parametric regression on cumulative incidence function. Biostatistics, 8, 2, 184-196.
    • Kaishev, V.K., Dimitrova, D.S., Haberman, S. (2007). Modelling the joint distribution of competing risks survival times using copula functions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 41, 339-361.
    • Kalbfleisch, J.D. and Prentice, R.L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Kaput, J., Swartz, D., Paisley, E., Mangian H., Daniel, W. L., Visek, W.J. (1994). Diet-Disease Interactions at the Molecular Level: An Experimental Paradigm. The Journal of Nutrition, 124, 1296S-1305S.
    • Lawless, J.F. (2003). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Lindqvist, H. B. (2007). Competing risks In: Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability, Ruggeri, F., Kenett, R. and Faltin, F. W. (eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp 335-341.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article