Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Liu, Feng
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
This dissertation seeks to contribute to the body of literature covering the field of inter-organizational relationships of entrepreneurial firms in developing economies. More specifically, this study attempts to fill a significant gap in the research into relationships between entrepreneurial firms and their venture capital investors in China. Even though it has been recognized that social capital embedded in inter-organizational relationship may be more important in imperfect completion characterized by weak institutional support and distorted information, there is little rigorous, theory-based, empirical research that focuses on the factors influencing the monitoring and value-added that start-up companies receive from their venture capital investors in developing countries. This dissertation contributes to the literature by developing and empirically testing a model of the monitoring and the value-added mechanisms and of the factors influencing those mechanisms. Based on a review of the literature covering venture capital and related domains of research into inter-organizational relationships, this dissertation identifies formal and informal monitoring as the primary mechanism through which venture capital oversee their investees, and classifies resource and knowledge access as the major mechanisms through which venture capital investments add value to technology-based new firms beyond financing. Building on received theories, an integrated model of the monitoring and value-added mechanisms, and the factors influencing those mechanisms is developed. The model draws on the agency theory and the asymmetric information and resource-based view of the firm in order to understand the factors influencing both mechanisms. These theories are complemented by social capital theory in identifying the factors facilitating monitoring and sharing resource/knowledge across organizational boundaries. In order to test the model empirically, primary data were collected from fund managers of active Chinese venture capital using two sequential mail surveys. The primary data were complemented by archival data. The hypotheses were tested using multivariate statistical techniques, including multiple regression analysis and structural equation modelling. The model and the hypotheses received support from the empirical data. This dissertation makes important contributions to the literature in the area of venture capital and inter-organizational relationships of technology-based new firms in the Chinese business environment. The findings have important practical implications for venture capital either seeking investment opportunities in China or already managing an existing investor relationship with a Chinese investee. In addition to venture capitalists, the findings have important implications for entrepreneurs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Reid, G.C., 1998. 'Venture Capital Investment: An Agency Analysis of Practice', Routledge, UK.
    • Reiner, M. 1989. “The transformation o f venture capital: a history of venture capital organizations in the United States”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
    • Remenyi, D., and Williams, B., 1995. 'Some Aspects o f Methodology for Research in Information System', Journal o f Information Technology', 10, pp. 191 - 201.
    • Renucci, A., 2000. Optimal contracts between entrepreneurs and value-enhancing financiers. Working Paper, University o f Toulouse.
    • Repullo, R., Suarez, J., 1998. Venture Capital Finance: a security design approach. Working Paper, CEMFI.
    • Repullo, Rafeal and Suarez, Javier, 1999. Venture capital finance: a severity design approach, working paper, centre for monetary and financial studies, Madrid, Spain, 1999 Research Institute, No. 40.
    • Rind KW. 1981. The Role o f Venture Capital in Corporate Development. Strategic Management Journal 2: 169-180.
    • Ritter, J., Welch, I., 2002. A review o f IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance 57, 1795- 1828.
    • Ritter, Jay, 1991. The long run performance of IPOs, Journal of Fiance 46, 3-27 Roberts EB, Berry CA. 1985. Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies for Success. Sloan Management Review 26(3): 3-17.
    • Roberts EB. 1980. New Ventures for Corporate Growth. Harvard Business Review 58: 134-142.
    • Robin, A., and Babbie, E., 1989. 'Research Methods for Social Work', Wadsworth Publication Company, USA.
    • Robinson KC, McDougall PP. 2001. Entry Barriers and New Venture Performance: A Comparison o f Universal and Contingency Approaches. Strategic Management Journal 22: 659-685.
    • Roman, Z., 1991. Entrepreneurship and Small Business: The Hungarian Trajectory, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 447 - 465.
    • Roper, S. 1999. Modelling Small Businees Growth and Profitability, Small Business Economics, 13, (3), pp. 235 - 252.
    • Roscoe, P.J. and McGrath, J.E., 1975. Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2 Edition, Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, New York.
    • Rosenstein J, Bruno AV, Bygrave WD, Taylor NT. 1989. Do Venture Capitalists on Boards o f Portfolio Companies Add Value Besides Money? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College: Wellesley, MA.
    • Rosenstein J, Bruno AV, Bygrave WD, Taylor NT. 1993. The CEO, Venture Capitalists, and the Board. Journal o f Business Venturing 8: 99-113.
    • Rosenstein, J. 1988. The board and strategy: venture capital and high technology, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 159-70.
    • Ross, S., 1976. The determination o f financial structure: the incentive signalling approach. Bell Journal o f Economics, 2 3 - 40.
    • Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL. 2001. More Good Things Are Not Necessarily Better: An Empirical Study o f Strategic Alliances, Experience Effects, and New Product Development in High-Technology Start-Ups. Forthcoming in Creating Value: Winners in the New Business Environment. Hitt MA, Amit R, Lucier C, Nixon RD (eds). Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, UK.
    • Rothwell R, Zegweld W. 1982. Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm. Frances Pinter: London, UK.
    • Rothwell R. 1989. SMFs, Inter-Firm Relationships and Technological Change. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 1: 275-291.
    • Rothwell, R. 1989. Small firms, innovation and industrial change, Small Business Economics, 1(1), pp. 51-64.
    • Roure, J., Keeley, R., and Hyden, T., 1990. 'European Venture Capital', European Management Journal, 8, (8), PP. 243 - 252.
    • Ruhnka JC, Young JE. 1991. Some Hypotheses about Risk in Venture Capital Investing. Journal o f Business Venturing 6: 115-133.
    • Rumelt RP. 1984. Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm. In Competitive Strategic Management. Lamb RB (ed). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 556-570.
    • Sahlman WA. 1990. The Structure and Governance of Venture Capital Organizations. Journal o f Financial Economics 27: 473-521.
    • Sahlman, W., 1988. Aspects o f financial contracting in venture capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 1, 2 3 - 36.
    • Sahlman, William, 1990. The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal o f financial economics, 473-521
    • Sankar CS, Boulton WR, Davidson NW, Snyder CA, Ussery RW. 1995. Building a World-Class Alliance: The Universal Card-TSYS Case. Academy of Management Executive 9 (2): 20-29.
    • Sapienza HJ, Amason AC, Manigart S. 1994. The Level and Nature of Venture Capitalist Involvement in Their Portfolio Companies: A Study of Three European Countries. Managerial Finance 20(1): 3-17.
    • Sapienza HJ, Gupta AK. 1994. Impact o f Agency Risks and Task Uncertainty of Venture Capitalist - CEO Interaction. Academy o f Management Journal 37(6): 1618-1632.
    • Sapienza HJ, Korsgaard MA. 1996. Procedural Justice in Entrepreneur-Investor Relations. Academy o f Management Journal 39(3): 544-574.
    • Sapienza HJ, Manigart S, Vermeir W. 1996. Venture Capitalist Governance and Value-added in Four Countries. Journal o f Business Venturing 11: 439-469.
    • Sapienza HJ. 1992. When Do Venture Capitalists Add Value? Journal of Business Venturing 7(6): 9-27.
    • Sapienza, H.J., Amason, A.C., and Manigart, S. 1994. The level and nature of venture capitalist involvement in their portfolio companies: A study of three European countries. Managerial Finance, 20(1), 3-17.
    • Sapienza, HJ. 1989. Variations in venture-capitalist-entrepreneur relations: Antecedents and consequences; unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland; USA.
    • Sarkar MB, Echambadi R, Cavusgil ST, Preet S. Aulakh PS. 2001. Seeking Similar, Yet Different: The Effects o f Complementarity, Compatibility, and Relationship Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, H., 1997. Research Methods for Business Students, Pitman Publishing, UK.
    • Saxenian A. 1990. Regional Networks and Resurgence o f Silicon Valley. California Management Review 33(1): 89-112.
    • Saxton T. 1997. The Effects o f Partner And Relationship Characteristics on Alliance Outcomes. Academy o f Management Journal 40: 443-461.
    • Scherer, F., 1991. Changing perspectives on the firm size problem. In: Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (Eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. University o f Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 24- 28.
    • Schmidt, K., 2001. Convertible securities and venture capital finance. Working Paper, Universitat Munchen.
    • Schoonhoven CB, Eisenhardt KM, Lyman K. 1990. Speeding Products to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introduction in New Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 177-207.
    • Schoonhoven CB, Lyman K. 2000. Strategic Alliances or Strategic Fantasies: Unraveling the Value o f Alliances for New, Scienced-Based Ventures. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College: Wellesley, MA.
    • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. 1996. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
    • Scott M, Bruce R. 1987. Five Stages o f Growth in Small Business. Long Range Planning 20(3): 45-52.
    • Sekaran, U., 1992. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 2 edition, John Willey & Sons, USA.
    • Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L.S., and Cook, S.W., 1976. Research Methods in Social Relations, edition, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
    • Sen, A. 1980. Labour and technology, in Cody, J., Hugehes, H., and Wall, D. edited Policies for Industrial Progress in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Seppa T, Maula MVJ. 2001. Investor Certification of Venture Capital Investments: Does Top-End Backing Lead to Improved Value Creation? Paper presented at the 21st Annual International Conference of Strategic Management Society.
    • Shan W, Hamilton W. 1991. Country-Specific Advantage and International Cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 12(6): 419-432.
    • Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. 1994. Interfirm Cooperation and Start-Up Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management Journal 15: 387-394.
    • Sharma P, Chrisman JJ. 1999. Toward a Reconciliation o f the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (Spring): 11-27.
    • Sheatsley, P., 1974. 'Survey Design: Handbook of Marketing Research', Robert Ferber; McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 2- 66.
    • Shepherd J. 1991. Entrepreneurial Growth Through Constellations. Journal of Business Venturing 6(5) 363-373.
    • Shivdasani, Anil, 1993. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers, Journal o f Accounting and Economics 16, 167-198
    • Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert Vishny, 1986a. Greenmail, white knights, and shareholder's interest, Rand Journal o f Economics 17, 293-309
    • Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert Vishny, 1986b. Large shareholders and corporate control, Journal o f Political Economy 94, 461-488
    • Shrader RC, Oviatt BM, McDougall PP. 2000. How New Ventures Exploit Trade-Offs Among International Risk Factors: Lessons for the Accelerated Internationalization o f the 21st Century. Academy of Management Journal 43(6): 1227-1247.
    • Shrader RC, Simon M. 1997. Corporate Versus Independent Ventures: Resource, Strategy, and Performance Differences. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 47-66.
    • Shrader RC. 2001. Collaboration and Performance in Foreign Markets: The Case of Young High-Technology Manufacturing Firms. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 45-60.
    • Siegel R, Siegel E, MacMillan IC. 1988. Corporate Venture Capitalists: Autonomy, Obstacles, and Performance. Journal o f Business Venturing, 3(3): 233-248.
    • Siegel S. 2001. Strategic Research Partnerships and Economic Performance: Data Considerations. In Strategic Research Partnerships: Proceedings from an NSF Workshop. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies: Arlington, VA.
    • Simonin BL. 1999. Ambiguity and the Process o f Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal 20: 595-623.
    • Singh JV, Tucker DJ, House RJ. 1986. Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 171-193.
    • Singh K. 1997. The Impact o f Technological Complexity and Interfirm Cooperation on Business Survival. Academy o f Management Journal 40(2): 339-367.
    • Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., and Ireland, R.D. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1): 273-292.
    • Smith A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes o f the Wealth of Nations. Reprinted in 1937, The Modem Library: New York, NY.
    • Smith DG. 1998. Venture Capital Contracting in the Information Age. The Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law 2(1): 133-176.
    • Smith DG. 2001. How Early Stage Entrepreneurs Evaluate Venture Capitalists? Journal of Private Equity (4)2: 33-46
    • Smith J., 2003. Post Investment Performance Appraisal: the impact o f venture capital investment on small firm performance, Journal of Private Equity vol. 7 Issue: 1 pp. 36-49
    • Smith KG, Carroll SJ, Ashford SJ. 1995. Intra- and Interorganizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda. Academy o f Management Journal 38(1): 7-21.
    • Smith, Clifford, and Jerold Warner, 1979. On financial contacting: an analysis of bond covenants, Journal o f Financial Economics 7, 117-161
    • Smith, J. 2005. Empirical Study o f a Venture Capital Relationship, Accounting Auditing and Accountability vol. 18 Issue: 6 pp. 756-783
    • Steiger JH, Shapiro A, Browne MW. 1985. On the Multivariate Asymptotic Distribution o f Sequential Chi-Square Statistics. Psychometrika 50: 253-264.
    • Stein J. 1997. On Building and Leveraging Competences Across Organizational Borders: A Socio-Cognitive Framework. In Competence-Based Strategic Management. Heene A, Sanchez R (eds). Wiley: Chichester: 267-284.
    • Stein M, Bygrave WD. 1990. The Anatomy o f High-Tech IPOs: Do Their Venture Capitalists, Underwriters, Accountants, and Lawyers Make a Difference? Frontiers o f Entrepreneurship Research. Babson College: Wellesley, MA: 394-407.
    • Steinfeld, E. 1998. Forging Reform in China: The Fate o f State-Owned Industry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Steire, L. and Geenwood, R. 1995. Venture Capitalist Relationships in the Deal Structuring and Post-Investment Stages o f New Firm Creation', Journal of Management Studies, 32, 3, pp. 337 - 357.
    • Stigler, G., 1971. The economic theory o f regulation. Bell Journal of Economics 2, 3 -2 1.
    • Stiglitz, J., 1985. Credit markets and the control o f capital. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 17, 133-152.
    • Stinchcombe AL. 1965. Social Structure and Organizations. In Handbook of Organizations. March J (ed). Rand McNally: Chicago, IL: 142-193.
    • Stronks K, Mheen, Looman, Mackenbach, 2008. Behavioural and structural factors in the explanation o f socio-economic inequalities in health: an empirical analysis. Sociology o f Health & Illness. Volume 18 Issue 5, Pages 653 - 674
    • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC. 1999. Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance o f Entrepreneurial Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 315-349.
    • Stuart TE. 1998. Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation o f Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 668-698.
    • Swaminathan A, Hoetker G, Mitchell W. 2001. Network Structure and Business Survival: The Case o f U.S. Automobile Component Suppliers. Working paper.
    • Sykes HB, Block Z. 1989. Corporate Venturing Obstacles: Sources and Solutions. Journal o f Business Venturing 4(3): 159-167.
    • Sykes HB. 1986. The Anatomy o f a Corporate Venturing Program: Factors Influencing Success. Journal o f Business Venturing 1: 275-293.
    • Sykes HB. 1990. Corporate Venture Capital: Strategies for Success. Journal of Business Venturing 5(1): 37-47.
    • Tam, O. 1999. The Development o f Corporate Governance in China, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
    • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533.
    • Teece, D. 1986. Transaction cost economics and the multinational enterprise: an assessment, Journal o f Economic Behavior and Organization, 7, 21-45
    • Teoh, S. H., Ivo Welch, and T.J. Wong, 1995. Earnings management and post-issue under performance o f seasoned equity offerings, manuscript, University of California
    • Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. 1996. Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity o f scores: An historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 213-224.
    • Thorndike, R.M. 1996. Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    • Thornhill S, Amit R. 2000. A Dynamic Perspective o f Internal Fit in Corporate Venturing. Journal o f Business Venturing 16: 25-50.
    • Tirole, Jean, 1994. Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Manuscript, IDEI, Toulouse, France.
    • Titman S, Trueman B. 1986. Information Quality and the Valuation o f New Issues. Journal o f Accounting and Economics (June): 159-172.
    • Tonnenberger, M., 1992. In Search of the Perfect Plastic, Quirk's Marketing Research Review, 5, pp. 6 - 7 .
    • Townsend, Robert, 1978. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification, Journal o f Economic Theory 21, 265-293
    • Trester J. 1998. Venture Capital Contracting under Asymmetric Information. Journal o f Banking and Finance 22: 675-699.
    • Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
    • Tsai W, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role o f Intrafirm Networks. Academy o f Management Journal 41(4): 464-476.
    • Tsai W. 2000. Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intraorganizational Linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21: 925-939.
    • Tsai W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intra-Organizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance. Academy o f Management Journal (44(5): 996-1004.
    • Tsang, E. W. K. 1998. Can guanxi be a source o f sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy o f Management Executive, 12(2): 64-73.
    • Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to Global Management Knowledge: A Case for High Quality Indigenous Research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (4).
    • Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research (editorial), M anagement and Organization Review, 2: 1-13.
    • Tsui, A. S., and Farh, J. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24: 56-79.
    • Tushman ML, Anderson P. 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439-465.
    • Tyebjee, T. and Bruno, A. 1984, A model of venture capital investment activity, Management Science, Vol. 30 No. 9, pp. 1051-66.
    • Ueno, S. and Sekaran, U. 1992. The influence of culture on budget control practices in the USA and Japan: an empirical study, Journal o f International Business Studies, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 659-74.
    • Unnava, H.R., Bumkrant, R.E., and Erevelles, S., 1994. Effects of Presentation Order and Communication Modality on Recall and Attitude, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp. 481 - 490.
    • Uzzi B. 1997. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox o f Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(March): 35-67.
    • Van Auken, H. 2000. The Familiarity of Small Technology-Based Business Owners with Sources o f Capital: Impact of Location and Capitalization. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 99, 33-47.
    • Van Auken, H. and Sonnebom, M. 2001. New Technology-Based Firms' Pursuit of SBIR Funds. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 12,14-25.
    • Van Auken, Howard 2004. The Use o f Bootstrap Financing Among Small Technology-Based Firms, Journal o f Developmental Entrepreneurship. Norfolk: Vol. 9, Iss. 2; pg. 145,15 pgs
    • Van De Ven AH, Hudson RM, Schroeder DM. 1984. Designing New Business Startups: Entrepreneurial, Organizational, and Ecological Considerations. Journal o f Management 10(1): 87-107.
    • Wasserman, J.N.W., and Kutner, M., 1985. Applied Linear Statistical Model, 2 edition, Richard 0. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois, US.
    • Weaver KM, Dickson PH. 1998. Outcome Quality o f Small-to-Medium-sized Enterprise-Based Alliances: The Role o f Perceived Partner Behaviors. Journal of Business Venturing 13(6): 505-522.
    • l~l 41. What Is your board representation in your portfolio com panies? (Please Identify below on a scale from 1 to 8, where 1 is 'never* and 8 is 'always'.)
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article