LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Davies, Zoe G.; Wilson, Robert J.; Brereton, Tom M.; Thomas, Chris D. (2005)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QH75

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: fungi
Many specialist species are declining as a result of habitat loss and fragmentation, such that conservation actions typically aim to stem rates of decline rather than bring about genuine recovery. Here, we document the recovery of a species from former population refuges. An extensive survey of the entire British range of Hesperia comma, conducted in 2000, recorded over three times the number of tetrads (2 km · 2 km grid squares) occupied in 1982. This was accompanied by a fourfold increase in the number of populations and a 10-fold increase in the habitat area occupied. The improving status of H. comma is the product of good habitat management, recovering rabbit populations and climate warming, which have improved the quality, and increased the availability, of suitable habitat. This has enabled remnant metapopulations to expand, via distance-dependent colonisation, through large networks of habitat. Metapopulation recovery in H. comma demonstrates that landscape-scale conservation can be successful.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akcakaya, H.R., 2000. Conservation and management for multiple species: integrating field research and modelling into management decisions. Environmental Management 26, S75-S83.
    • Andre´n, H., 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation in birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71, 355-366.
    • Asher, J., Warren, M.S., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G., Jeffcoate, S., 2001. The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Baillie, S.R., Sutherland, W.J., Freeman, S.N., Gregory, R.D., Paradis, E., 2000. Consequences of large-scale processes for the conservation of bird populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 88-102.
    • Barnett, L.K., Warren, M.S., 1995. Species Action Plan: Silver-spotted Skipper Hesperia Comma. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, Dorset.
    • Bellamy, P.E., Hinsley, S.A., Newton, I., 1996. Local extinctions and re-colonisations of passerine bird populations in small woods. Oecologia 108, 64-71.
    • Cabeza, M., 2003. Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters 6, 665- 672.
    • Carlson, A., 2000. The effect of habitat loss on a deciduous forest specialist species: the white-backed woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos). Forest Ecology and Management 131, 215-221.
    • Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A., Warren, M.S., 1999. Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266, 1587-1592.
    • Defra, 2003. Scheme introduction. www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/schemes/ default.htm.
    • Etienne, R.S., Heesterbeek, J.A.P., 2001. Rules of thumb for conservation of metapopulations based on stochastic winking-patch model. American Naturalist 158, 389-407.
    • Gaona, P., Ferreras, P., Delibes, M., 1998. Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Ecological Monographs 68, 349-370.
    • Gibbs, J.P., Stanton, E.J., 2001. Habitat fragmentation and arthropod community change: carrion beetles, phorectic mites, and flies. Ecological Applications 11, 79-85.
    • Gilpin, M.E., Hanski, I.A., 1991. Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Academic Press, London.
    • Groombridge, B., 1992. Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth s Living Resources. Chapman and Hall, London.
    • Hanski, I., 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396, 41-49.
    • Hanski, I., 1999. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Hanski, I., Gilpin, M., 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 3-16.
    • Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E., 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London.
    • Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., 1994. Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology 75, 747-762.
    • Hanski, I., Pakkala, T., Kuussaari, M., Lei, G., 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72, 21-28.
    • Harrison, S., 1991. Local extinctions in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. In: Gilpin, M.E., Hanski, I.A. (Eds.), Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Academic press, London, pp. 73-88.
    • Harrison, S., Bruna, E., 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure?. Ecography 22, 225-232.
    • Harrison, S., Taylor, A.D., 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London, pp. 27-42.
    • Harrison, S., Murphy, D.D., Ehrlich, P.R., 1988. Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. American Naturalist 132, 360-382.
    • Heath, J., Pollard, E., Thomas, J.A., 1984. Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Viking Penguin Books, London.
    • Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Lewis, O.T., 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 65, 725-735.
    • Hill, J.K., Collingham, Y.C., Thomas, C.D., Blakeley, D.S., Fox, R., Moss, D., Huntley, B., 2001. Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecology Letters 4, 313-321.
    • Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Fox, R., Telfer, M.G., Willis, S.G., Asher, J., Huntley, B., 2002. Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269, 2163- 2171.
    • Kindvall, O., 1996. Habitat heterogeneity and survival in a bush cricket metapopulation. Ecology 77, 207-214.
    • Kindvall, O., Ahle´n, I., 1992. Geometrical factors and metapopulation dynamics of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor Philippi (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae). Conservation Biology 6, 520-529.
    • Kotze, D.J., O Hara, R.B., 2003. Species decline - but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135, 138-148.
    • Kuussaari, M., Saccheri, I., Camara, M., Hanski, I., 1998. Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos 82, 384-392.
    • Levins, R., 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15, 237-240.
    • Lewis, O.T., Hurford, C., 1997. Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. Journal of Insect Conservation 1, 159-166.
    • Lobley, M., Potter, C., 1998. Environmental stewardship in UK agriculture: a comparison of the environmentally sensitive area programme and the countryside stewardship scheme in south east England. Geoforum 29, 413-432.
    • Maes, D., van Dyck, H., 2001. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe s worst case scenario?. Biological Conservation 99, 263-276.
    • Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243-253.
    • McCarthy, M.A., Lindenmayer, D.B., 1999. Incorporating metapopulation dynamics of great gliders into reserve design in disturbed landscapes. Ecology 80, 651-667.
    • Medellin, R.A., 2003. Diversity and conservation of bats in Mexico: research priorities, strategies, and actions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 87-97.
    • Moilanen, A., Smith, A.T., Hanski, I., 1998. Long-term dynamics in a metapopulation of the American pika. American Naturalist 152, 530-542.
    • Ovenden, G.N., Swash, A.R.H., Smallshire, D., 1998. Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. Journal of Applied Ecology 35, 955-960.
    • Pannekoek, J., van Strien, A., 1996. Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg.
    • Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., 1995. Landscape ecology - spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269, 331-334.
    • Pollard, E., 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation 12, 115-134.
    • Ricketts, T.H., 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist 158, 87-99.
    • Robinson, R.A., Sutherland, W.J., 2002. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 39, 157-176.
    • Rodriguez, A., Delibes, M., 2003. Population fragmentation and extinction in the Iberian lynx. Biological Conservation 109, 321-331.
    • Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Fownes, S., 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81, 1642-1653.
    • Roy, D.B., Thomas, J.A., 2003. Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin. Oecologia 134, 439-444.
    • Roy, D.B., Sparks, T.H., 2000. Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Global Change Biology 6, 407-416.
    • Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., Margules, C.R., 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation - a review. Conservation Biology 5, 18-32.
    • Shirt, D.B., 1987. British Red Data Books: 2. Insects. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough.
    • Sutcliffe, O.L., Thomas, C.D., Yates, T.J., GreatorexDavies, J.N., 1997. Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation. Oecologia 109, 235-241.
    • Sutcliffe, O.L., Bakkestuen, V., Fry, G., Stabbetorp, O.E., 2003. Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landscape and Urban Planning 63, 15-31.
    • Thomas, J.A., 1983. A quick method for estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biological Conservation 27, 195-211.
    • Thomas, C.D., 1995. The ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape. In: Pullin, A.S. (Ed.), Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 46-63.
    • Thomas, C.D., Hanski, I., 1997. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London, pp. 359-386.
    • Thomas, C.D., Jones, T.M., 1993. Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 472-481.
    • Thomas, J.A., Thomas, C.D., Simcox, D.J., Clarke, R.T., 1986. Ecology and declining status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 23, 365- 380.
    • Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A., Warren, M.S., 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92, 563-567.
    • Thomas, J.A., Morris, M.G., Hambler, C., 1994. Patterns, mechanisms and rates of extinction among invertebrates in the United Kingdom. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 344, 47-54.
    • Thomas, C.D., Baguette, M., Lewis, O.T., 2000. Butterfly movement and conservation in patchy landscapes. In: Gosling, I.M., Sutherland, W.J. (Eds.), Behaviour and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 85-105.
    • Thomas, C.D., Bodsworth, E.J., Wilson, R.J., Simmons, A.D., Davies, Z.G., Musche, M., Conradt, L., 2001a. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411, 577-581.
    • Thomas, J.A., Bourn, N.A.D., Clarke, R.T., Stewart, K.E., Simcox, D.J., Pearman, G.S., Curtis, R., Goodger, B., 2001b. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 268, 1791-1796.
    • Travis, J.M.J., 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences 270, 467-473.
    • Trout, R.C., Smith, G.C., 1995. The reproductive productivity of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in southern England on sites with different soils. Journal of Zoology 237, 411-422.
    • Trout, R.C., Tapper, E.C., Harradine, J., 1986. Recent trends in the rabbit population in Britain. Mammal Review 19, 153-173.
    • Trout, R.C., Ross, J., Tittensor, A.M., Fox, A.P., 1992. The effect on a British wild rabbit population (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of manipulating myxomatosis. Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 679-686.
    • UK Biodiversity Group, 1995. Biodiversity: the UK steering group report. HMSO, London.
    • van Swaay, C.A.M., Warren, M.S., 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies. Nature and Environment, No. 99, Council of European Publishing, Strasbourg.
    • Warren, M.S., 1993. A review of butterfly conservation in central southern Britain. 1. Protection, evaluation and extinction on prime sites. Biological Conservation 64, 25-35.
    • Warren, M.S., Bourn, N.A.D., 1997. The impact of grassland management on threatened butterflies in ESA s. In: Sheldrick, R.D. (Ed.), Grassland Management in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas. British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium No. 32, Arrowhead Books, Reading, pp. 138-143.
    • Warren, M.S., Thomas, J.A., Wilson, R.J., 1999. Management Options for the Silver-spotted Skipper Butterfly: a Study of the Timing of Grazing at Beacon Hill NNR, Hampshire, 1983-1998. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, Dorset.
    • Warren, M.S., Hill, J.K., Thomas, J.A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D.B., Telfer, M.G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G., Willis, S.G., Greatorex-Davies, J.N., Moss, D., Thomas, C.D., 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65-69.
    • Wiens, J.A., 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London, pp. 43-62.
    • Zschokke, S., Dolt, C., Rusterholz, H.P., Oggier, P., Braschler, B., Thommen, G.H., Lu¨ din, E., Erhardt, A., Baur, B., 2000. Shortterm responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental smallscale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia 125, 559-572.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article