Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bell, A.J.; Jones, K. (2013)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
This commentary discusses the age–period–cohort identification problem. It shows that, despite a plethora of proposed solutions in the literature, no model is able to solve the identification problem because the identification problem is inherent to the real-world processes being modelled. As such, we cast doubt on the conclusions of a number of papers, including one presented here (Page, Milner, Morrell, & Taylor, 2013). We conclude with some recommendations for those wanting to model age, period and cohort in a compelling way.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bell, A., & Jones, K. (under review-a). Another 'futile quest'? A simulation study of Yang and Land's Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model. Working paper. Available at http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19138881/5392730501/d2fb15102177bd6fd8 a32cab9e4193776576e41c/dl.pdf [Accessed 19th April 2013].
    • Bell, A., & Jones, K. (under review-b). Current practice in the modelling of Age, Period and Cohort effects with panel data: a commentary on Tawfik et al (2012), Clarke et al (2009), and McCulloch (2012). Working paper. Available at http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19138881/5392730511/2f76331fbd618b02e5 2ff33515ff809b01fdab7c/dl.pdf [Accessed 19th April 2013].
    • Glenn, N.D. (1976). Cohort Analysts Futile Quest - Statistical Attempts to Separate Age, Period and Cohort Effects. American Sociological Review, 41, 900-904.
    • Glenn, N.D. (2005). Cohort Analysis. London: Sage.
    • Goldstein, H. (1979). Age, period and cohort effects - a confounded confusion. Journal of Applied Statistics, 6, 19-24.
    • Luo, L., & Hodges, J. (under review). The cross-classified age-period-cohort model as a constrained estimator. Working paper. Available at http://paa2013.princeton.edu/papers/132093 [Accessed 16th April 2013].
    • Mason, K.O., Mason, W.M., Winsborough, H.H., & Poole, K. (1973). Some Methodological Issues in Cohort Analysis of Archival Data. American Sociological Review, 38, 242-258.
    • McCulloch, A. (2012). Cohort variation in the membership of volunatary organisations in Great Britain, 1991-2007. Working paper. Available at http://www.significancemagazine.org/SpringboardWebApp/userfiles/sig/file/Paper.pdf [Accessed 3rd Spetember 2012].
    • Osmond, C., & Gardner, M.J. (1989). Age, Period, and Cohort Models - Non-Overlapping Cohorts Dont Resolve the Identification Problem. American Journal of Epidemiology, 129, 31-35.
    • Robertson, C., & Boyle, P. (1986). Age, Period and Cohort Models - the Use of Individual Records. Statistics in medicine, 5, 527-538.
    • Ryder, N.B. (1965). The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social-Change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843-861.
    • Suzuki, E. (2012). Time changes, so do people. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 452-456.
    • Tu, Y.K., Smith, G.D., & Gilthorpe, M.S. (2011). A New Approach to Age-Period-Cohort Analysis Using Partial Least Squares Regression: The Trend in Blood Pressure in the Glasgow Alumni Cohort. Plos One, 6.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article