Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hundley, Vanora; Van Teijlingen, Edwin; Simkhada, Padam (2013)
Languages: English
Types: Article
We are frequently asked by our colleagues and students for advice on authorship for scientific articles. This short paper outlines some of the issues that we have experienced and the advice we usually provide. This editorial follows on from our work on submitting a paper1 and also on writing an academic paper for publication.2 We should like to start by noting that, in our view, there exist two separate, but related issues: (a) authorship and (b) order of authors. The issue of authorship centres on the notion of who can be an author, who should be an author and who definitely should not be an author, and this is partly discipline specific. The second issue, the order of authors, is usually dictated by the academic tradition from which the work comes. One can immediately envisage disagreements within a multi-disciplinary team of researchers where members of the team may have different approaches to authorship order.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Badhu, B.P Authorship disputes: A research misconduct (Editorial), Health Renaissance (2012) 10 (2): 78-79.
    • 2. Bennett, M What’s in a list?, BU Research Blog (24th September 2012), http:// blogs.bournemouth.ac.uk/research/2012/09/27/ whats-in-a-list/?utm_source=digest&utm_ medium=email&utm_campaign=daily
    • 3. Drenth JP. Multiple authorship: The Contribution of Senior Authors. JAMA (1998) 280(3): 219- 221.
    • 4. Hundley V.A., Avan B.I., Ahmed H., Graham W.J. for the Birth Kit Working Group. Clean birth kits to improve birth practices: development and testing of a country level decision support tool’ in the journal BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth (2012) 12:158 (http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1471-2393/12/158)
    • 5. Lansberg, M.G. et al. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study, Lancet Neurol (2012);, 11(10): 860-67.
    • 6. McIntosh S Author instructions Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, Wilderness Medical Society. (2012)(http://www.wemjournal.org/ authorinfo)
    • 7. Mowatt G., Shirran L., Grimshaw J.M., Rennie D., Flanagin A., Yank V., MacLennan G., Gøtzsche P.C., Bero L.A. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAm Med Assoc(2002); 287 (21): 2769- 2771.
    • 8. Newman A., Jones R. Authorship of research papers: ethical and professional issues for shortterm researchers. J Med Ethics. 2006; 32(7): 420–423.
    • 9. Oermann M.H., Hays J.C. Writing for publication in nursing (2nded) Springer Publishing Company: New York, (2012).
    • 10. Simkhada, P.P., van Teijlingen, E. Hundley, V. Writing an academic paper for publication (Guest editorial) Health Renaissance,(2013); 11(1):1-5.
    • 11. Smith R. Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.J R Soc Med, (2009); 99(5): 232–237.
    • 12. Strange, K. Authorship: why not just toss a coin? Am J Physiol,(2008); Cell Physiol 295: C567– C575.
    • 13. van Teijlingen, E., Simkhada. P.P., Rizyal, A. Submitting a paper to an academic peerreviewed journal, where to start? (Editorial), Health Renaissance,(2012); 10 (1): 1-4.
    • 14. Wren J.D, Kozak, K.Z., Johnson K.R., Deakyne S.J., Schilling L.M., Dellavalle R.P. The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. SciSoc(2007); 8 (11): 988-991.
    • 15. Zbar, A., Frank, E. Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International Assessment. Am J Med Sci,(2011); 341(2): 106- 109.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article