Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Martellozzo, Elena; Nehring, Daniel; Taylor, Helen (2010)
Publisher: K. Jaishankar
Languages: English
Types: Article
The expansion of the Internet and the proliferation of information technologies have created new opportunities for the sexual abuse of children. Sex offenders use the Internet to access and distribute indecent images of children and to select victims to groom for the purpose of abuse (Davidson & Gottschalk 2010; Martellozzo, 2010; Martellozzo & Taylor, 2009; Quayle, Erooga, Wright, Taylor, & Harbinson, 2006). It is a commonly held assumption, stated implicitly or explicitly in both public debates and scholarly research, that child sexual abuse is a typically male crime, in so far as offenders are generally held to be men and the level of sexual aggression involved in their offences is seen as closely related to masculine behaviour. This article aims to increase knowledge and understanding of the problem of online child sexual abuse by female offenders. As rehearsed in the literature (Martellozzo, 2011; Webster, Davidson, Bifulco, Pham, & Caretti, 2009), online child sexual abuse is predominantly a crime committed by men and only a small percentage of females sexually abuse children through the Internet. This article presents findings from analysis of qualitative data collected at the Paedophile Unit at the London Metropolitan Police.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alsop, R., Fitzsimons, A., & Lennon, K. (2002). Theorizing gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Bunting, L. (2007). Dealing with a Problem that doesn't Exist? Professional Responses to Female Perpetrated Child Sexual Abuse. Child Abuse Review, 12, 252-267.
    • Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    • Butler, S. (1985). Conspiracy of Silence: The Trauma of Incest: Volcano Press.
    • Corby, B. (1998). Managing Child Sexual Abuse Cases. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    • D'Ovidio, R., Mitman, T., El-Burki, I., & Shumar, W. (2009). Adult-Child Sex Advocacy Websites as Social Learning Environments: A Content Analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 421-440.
    • Davidson, J., & Gottschalk, P. (2010). International policy and legislation. In J. Davidson & P. Gottschalk (Eds.), Internet Child Abuse: Current Research, Policy and Police Practice. London: Routledge.
    • Denov, M. (2003). The Myth of Innocence: Sexual Scripts and the Recognition of Child Sexual Abuse by Female Perpetrators. Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303-315.
    • Denov, M. (2004). Perspectives on Female Sex Offending: A Culture of Denial. Ashgate: Aldershot.
    • Elliot, M. (2004). Female Sexual Abuse of Children: 'The Ultimate Taboo'. Kidscape.
    • Elliott, M. (1993). Female Sexual Abuse of Children. New York: The Guilford Press.
    • Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research. New York: Free Press.
    • Fromuth, M., & Burkhart, B. (1989). Long term Psychological Correlates of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Two Samples of College Men. Child Abuse and Neglect, 13, 533-542.
    • Grubin, D. (1998). Sex Offending against Children: Understanding the Risk. Police Research Series, 99.
    • Gudjonsson, G. (1988). Attribution of Blame for Criminal Acts and in Relationship with Type of Offence. Medical Science Law, 28(4), 301-303.
    • Heidensohn, F. (1987). Women and crime: Questions for criminology. In P. Carlen & A. Worral (Eds.), Gender, Crime and Justice (pp. 16-27). London: Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    • Hetherton, J., & Beardsall, L. (1988). Decisions and attitudes concerning child sexual abuse: Does the gender of the perpetrator make a difference to child protection professionals? Child Abuse and Neglect, 2(12), 1265-1283.
    • Hislop, J. (2001). Female sexual offenders: What therapists, law enforcement and child protective services need to know. Ravensdale, WA: Issues Press.
    • Jaffe, A., Dynneson, L., & Ten-Bensel, R. (1975). Sexual Abuse of Children. An Epidemiologic Study. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 129, 689-695.
    • Jennings, K. (1993). Female Child Molesters: A review of the Literature. In M. Elliott (Ed.), Female Sexual Abuse of Children (pp. 219-234). New York: Longman Group.
    • Kelly, L. (1996). Weasel Words: Paedophiles and the Cycle of Abuse. Trouble and Strife, 33, 44-49.
    • Kessler, S. J., & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Kimmel, M. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Krug, R. (1989). Adult Male Report of Childhood Sexual Abuse by Mothers: Case Descriptions, Motivations, and Long-Term Consequences. Child Abuse and Neglect, 13, 111-119.
    • La Fontaine, J. S. (1990). Child sexual abuse. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.
    • Levenson, J. S., & Macgowan, M. J. (2004). Engagement, Denial, and Treatment Progress among Sex Offenders in Group Therapy Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(1), 49-63.
    • Martellozzo, E. (2010). Policing Online Child Sexual Abuse. A Case Study of the London Metropolitan Police. Kingston University, Kingston.
    • Martellozzo, E. (2011). Understanding the Perpetrator's Online Behaviour. In J. Davidson & P. Gottschalk (Eds.), Sex Offenders Use of the Internet' In Internet Child Abuse: Current Research & Practice (pp. 104-124). Abington: Routledge-Cavendish.
    • Martellozzo, E., & Taylor, H. (2009). Cycle of Abuse. Index on Censorship, 38(1), 117- 122.
    • Mathews, R. (1989). Female Sexual Offenders: An Explanatory Study. Brandon: Safer Society Press.
    • Mathews, R., Matthews, J., & Speltz, K. (1989). Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Press.
    • Matravers, A. (2008). Understanding Women Who Commit Sex Offences. In G. Letherby, K. Williams, P. Birch & M. Cain (Eds.), Sex as Crime? (pp. 299-320). Cullumpton: Willan Publishing.
    • National Centre for Child Abuse and Neglect. (1981). Study Findings: National Study of the Incidence and Severity of Child Abuse and Neglect. Washington D.C.: D.H.E.W.
    • NSPCC. (28 April 2010). 'Snapshot' of court cases reveals 2m online child sex abuse images
    • Oakley, A. (1972). Sex Gender and Society. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
    • Ortner, S., & Whitehead, H. (1981). Introduction: Accounting for Sexual Meanings. In S. Ortner & H. Whitehead (Eds.), Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to a Critical Humanism. London: Sage.
    • Pollak, O. (1978). The Criminality of Women. Westport: Greenwood Press.
    • Quayle, E., Erooga, M., Wright, L., Taylor, M., & Harbinson, D. (2006). Only Pictures? Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
    • Riessman, K. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
    • Salter, D., McMillan, D., Richards, M., Talbot, M., Hodges, J., Bentovin, A., et al. (2003). Development of Sexually Abusive Behaviour in Sexually Victimised males: a Longitudinal Study. The Lancet, 361, 9356-9471.
    • Schneider, S., & Wright, R. (2004). Understanding Denial in Sexual Offenders. A Review of Cognitive and Motivational Processes to Avoid Responsibility. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 5(1), 3-20.
    • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
    • Walby, S. (1990). Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Webster, S., Davidson, J., Bifulco, A., Pham, T., & Caretti, V. (2009). European Online Grooming Project : Progress Report Covering Period: 1 June 2009 - 31 December 2009.
    • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (2000). Doing Gender. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered society reader (pp. 131-149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article