Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lucock, Mike; Barber, Rosemary; Jones, Anthony; Lovell, Jacqui
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0321, BF
Background: Self-help approaches for mental health problems are a research and service development priority within the UK. \ud \ud Aim: To engage service users in the research process through a consultation exercise, seek their views on the strategies they use to manage their lives and priorities for research into self-help. \ud \ud Method: Service users were involved in planning and conducting a consultation event and in analysing, interpreting and disseminating the findings. Forty nine service users attended the consultation event. Notes and key points from focus groups discussions were analysed to identify main themes. \ud \ud Results: Five themes for service user self-help strategies were identified; managing and structuring the day; empowerment; engaging others to help yourself; physical health and well being; and spirituality. Four research priority areas in self-help were identified: the importance of user-led research; research into self-help strategies to improve physical health and well being; mapping of available services and self-help approaches; and what works and why. \ud \ud Conclusions: Self-help research and developments should take account of these service users' views of research priorities and the strategies they use to manage their lives. \ud \ud Declaration of interest: The project was initiated by Psychological Therapies Network North (PsyReNN). Funding for the venue and service user expenses was provided by the NIMHE Regional Development Centre, North East, Yorkshire and Humberside and by the Tees and North East Yorkshire Mental Health and Learning Disabilities NHS Trust.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barnes, M. (1997). From passive recipient to active citizen: participation in mental health user groups. Journal of Mental Health, 6, 289-300.
    • Crabtree, B.J. & Miller, W.L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organising style of interpretation, In B.F Crabtree, and W.L. Miller, (Eds.), Doing qualitative Research, (pp 163-177). London: Sage.
    • Davis, A. & Braithwaite, T. (2001). In our own hands. Mental Health Care, 41, 413-414.
    • Department of Health (1999). Modern Standards and Service Models: National Service Framework for Mental Health. London: Department of Health.
    • Department of Health (2001) “Treatment Choice in Psychological Therapies and Counselling”, London, HMSO. www.doh.gov.uk/mentalhealth/treatmentguideline.
    • Faulkner, A. & Layzell, S. (2000). Strategies for Living: A report of user-led research into Glaser, B. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine.
    • King, N. (1994). The qualitative research interview. In C. Cassell, and G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research (pp 14-36). London: Sage.
    • King, N. (1998). Template analysis. Template analysis. In C. Cassell, and G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide. (pp 118-134). London: Sage.
    • Lewis, G., Anderson, L., Araya, R., Elgie, R., Harrison, G., Proudfoot, J., Schmidt, U., Sharpe, D., Weightman, A., & Williams, C (2003). Self-help interventions for mental Lord, J., Ochocka, J., Czarny, W. & MacGillivary, H. (1998). Analysis of change within a mental health organisation: a participatory process. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 21, 327-39.
    • Lovell, K. and Richards, D. (2000). Multiple access points and levels of entry (MAPLE): Ensuring Choice, Accessibility and Equity for CBT Services. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 379-391.
    • Lucock, M.P., Padgett, K., Noble, R., Westley, A., Atha, C., Horsefield, C., and Leach, C. (2005) Controlled Clinical Trial of a self-help intervention while clients are waiting Sheppard, B. (2000). A voice for older Londoners in the doctor's surgery. London: Age Concern.
    • Smith, J.A., Scammon, D.L., Beck, S.L. (1995). Using patient focus groups for new patient services. Jt. Comm. Journal Quality Improvement, 21(1), 22-31.
    • Telford, R. & Faulkner, A. (2004). Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 13 (6), 549-559.
    • Townend, M. & Braithwaite, T. (2002). Mental health research - the value of user involvement. Journal of Mental Health,11 (2), 117-119.
    • Trivedi, P. & Wykes, T. (2002). From passive subjects to equal partners. British Journal of Weber, R.P. (1985). Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    • Wright, S. (2004a) Self-help Groups. Self-help groups for individuals who experience mental distress: Proceedings of a self-help group members' symposium and a review of selected literature. The Mental Health Foundation and Rethink: London.
    • Wright, S. (2004b) Self-help and Mutual Aid Groups: An Emerging Movement. Updates, 5, (15). The Mental Health Foundation: London.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article