Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Meah, A.M. (2016)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
This essay seeks to broaden understandings of the domestic kitchen in the global North which consign its significance to the preparation or cooking of food, an activity assumed to be undertaken chiefly by women. Here, I take a social practice perspective, examining ‘the kitchen’ not as a monolithic physical ‘site’ (in the spatial sense) occupied primarily by women users, but as one where a range of practices cohere, reflecting multiple meanings and uses among those individuals who inhabit them. Exploring how the domestic kitchen has – over the last century – been conceptualised as a barometer of ideological dialectics, as an orchestrating concept and as the symbolic heart of the home, I reveal how this most humble of domestic spaces is both material and symbolic, figurative and substantive, rendering it a serious – but often neglected – object of academic inquiry.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • AARSETH, H. 2009. From Modernized Masculinity to Degendered Lifestyle Projects: Changes in Men's Narratives on Domestic Participation 1990 2005. Men and Masculinities, 11, 424- 440.
    • ATTFIELD, J. 1995. Inside Pram Town: a case study of Harlow house interiors, 1951-61, in Attfield, J. and Kirkham, P. (eds), A View from the Interior: women and design P pp.215-38.
    • BENNETT, K. 2006. Kitchen Drama: Performances, patriarchy and power dynamics in a Dorset farmhouse kitchen. Gender, Place & Culture, 13, 153-160.
    • BROWNLIE, D. & HEWER, P.A. 2007. Prime beef cuts: culinary images for thinking 'men'. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 10(3), 229-250.
    • CAIRNS, K., JOHNSTON, J. & BAUMANN, S. 2010. Caring about food: doing gender in the foodie kitchen. Gender and Society, 24, 591.
    • CIERAAD ' The Journal of Architecture, 7, 263-279.
    • CHAPMAN, T. & HOCKEY, J. (eds). 1999. Ideal Homes? Social Changeand Domestic Life. London, Routledge.
    • COCKBURN, C. & FÜRST-DILIC, R. 1994. Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in Changing Europe. Buckingham, OpenUniversity Press.
    • COCKBURN, C. & ORMROD, J. 2000. Gender and Technology in the Making. London, Sage.
    • CONRAN, S. 1975. Superwoman. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.
    • COWAN, R. S. 1998. ' P Household Technology and Social Change in the Twentieth Century. In Hopkins, P. (ed.) Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture, Gender and Technology. Indianapolis, IN, Indiana University Press.
    • COX, R. 2013. House/Work: Home as a Space of Work and Consumption, Geography Compass, 7(12), 821 8W31.
    • DOORLY, M. 1999. P Domestic Revolution. In MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman J. (eds).The Social Shaping of Technology, pp. 314 1W7. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    • EHRENREICH, B. & ENGLISH, D. 1979. For Her Own P . London, Pluto Press.
    • FREEMAN, J. 2004. The Making of the Modern Kitchen, Oxford, Berg.
    • GAVRON, H. 1966. The Captive Wife. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • GREGSON, N., METCALFE, A. & CREWE, L. 2007. Identity, mobility, and the throwaway society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 682-700.
    • HAND, M. & SHOVE, E. 2004. Orchestrating Concepts: Kitchen Dynamics and Regime Change in Good Housekeeping and Ideal Home. Home Cultures, 1, 235-256.
    • HAND, M., SHOVE, E. & SOUTHERTON, D. 2007. Home extensions in the United Kingdom: space, time, and practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 668-681.
    • HOLDEN, T. J. M. 2005. The overcooked and the underdone: masculinities in Japanese food programming. Food and foodways, 13, 39-65.
    • HOLLOWS, J. 2000 Feminism and Femininity and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    • HOLLOWS, J. 2003. Oliver's Twist: Leisure, Labour and Domestic Masculinity in The Naked Chef. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6, 229-248.
    • HOLTSMAN, J. D. 2006. Food and Memory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 361-378.
    • ISENSTADT, S. 1998. Visions of plenty: refrigerators in America around 1950. Journal of Design History, 11(4), 311-421.
    • JACKSON, P. 2013. Memory, in P. Jackson and the CONANX Group, Food Words: essays in culinary culture (pp. 137-139). London, Bloomsbury.
    • JERRAM, L. 2006. Kitchen sink dramas: women, modernity and space in Weimar Germany. Cultural Geographies, 13, 538-556.
    • JOHNSON, L. C. 2006. Browsing the Modern Kitchen a feast of gender, place and culture (Part 1). Gender, Place & Culture, 13, 123-132.
    • LLEWELLYN, M. 2004a. 'Urban village' or 'white house': envisioned spaces, experienced places, and everyday life at Kensal House, London in the 1930s. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 229-249.
    • LLEWELLYN, M. 2004b. Designed by women and designing women: gender, planning and the geographies of the kitchen in Britain 1917-1946. Cultural Geographies, 11, 42-60.
    • LLOYD, J. & JOHNSON, L. 2004. Dream stuff: the postwar home and the Australian housewife, 1940 - 60. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 251-272.
    • LONGHURST, R., JOHNSTON, L. & HO P ' women in New Zealand. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers 34, 333 3W45.
    • MEAH, A. 2014. Reconceptualizing power and gendered subjectivities in domestic cooking spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 38, 671-690.
    • MEAH, A. & JACKSON, P. 2013 P ' Gender, Place & Culture, 20, 578-596.
    • MEAH, A. and JACKSON, P. In press. Re-imagining the kitchen as a site of memory. Social & Cultural Geography. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2015.1089587
    • MEAH. A., WILLS, W., DICKINSON, A. & SHORT, F. 2013. “ locating the kitchen within the shifting emotional landscape of domestic life. Royal
    • ROSE, G. Family Photographs and Domestic Spacings: A Case Study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28(1), 5-18.
    • SAARIKANGAS, K. 2006. Displays of the Everyday. Relations between gender and the visibility of domestic work in the modern Finnish kitchen from the 1930s to the 1950s. Gender, Place & Culture, 13, 161-172.
    • SCANLAN, J. 2011. Counter Space: Design and the Modern Kitchen. Home Cultures, 8, 341-344.
    • SHORT, F. 2006. Kitchen Secrets: The meaning of cooking in everyday life, Oxford, Berg.
    • SCHNEIDERMAN, D. 2010. The prefabricated kitchen: substance and surface. Home Cultures, 7(3), 243-262.
    • SHOVE, E., WATSON, M., HAND, M. & INGRAM, J. 2007. The Design of Everyday Life. Oxford, Berg.
    • SHOVE, E. and SOUTHERTON, D. 2000. Defrosting the freezer: from novelty to convenience: a narrative of normalisation. Journal of Material Culture, 5, 301-319.
    • SILVA, E. 2000. The cook, the cooker and the gendering of the kitchen, The Sociological Review 48(4), 612-628.
    • SOCHUREK, H. 1959. TimeLife_image_248021, The Life Picture Collection, Getty Images. http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/soviet-premier-nikita-khrushchevpointing-finger-at-news-photo/50475727 ' P or Australian post-war immigrant women. Gender, Place & Culture, 13, 133-141.
    • SUTTON, D. 2001. Remembrances of Repasts: an anthropology of food and memory. Oxford, Berg.
    • SUTTON, D. 2008. Tradition and Modernity revisited: existential memory work on a Greek island. History & Memory, 20(2), 84-105.
    • SUTTON, D. 2011. Memory as a sense: a gustemological approach. Food, Culture & Society 14(4), 468-475.
    • SWENSON, R. 2009. Domestic divo: televised treatments of masculinity, femininity and food. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 26, 36-53.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article