LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
MacMillan, Douglas C.; Harrop, Stuart R.; Challender, Daniel W.S. (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Global Ecology and Conservation
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Wildlife trade, law, business, QH540-549.5, GN, H, KZ, agriculture, Economics, Ecology, Regulation, GF075, Compliance, geography, GE170, HC0079.E5, CITES, biological, Community conservation
International trade in wildlife is a key threat to biodiversity conservation. CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, seeks to ensure international wildlife trade is sustainable, relying on trade bans and controls. However, there has been little comprehensive review of its effectiveness and here we review approaches taken to regulate wildlife trade in CITES. Although assessing its effectiveness is problematic, we assert that CITES boasts few measurable conservation successes. We attribute this to: non-compliance, an over reliance on regulation, lack of knowledge and monitoring of listed species, ignorance of market forces, and influence among CITES actors. To more effectively manage trade we argue that interventions should go beyond regulation and should be multi-faceted, reflecting the complexity of wildlife trade. To inform these interventions we assert an intensive research effort is needed around six key areas: (1) factors undermining wildlife trade governance at the national level, (2) determining sustainable harvest rates for, and adaptive management of CITES species, (3) gaining the buy-in of local communities in implementing CITES, (4) supply and demand based market interventions, (5) means of quantifying illicit trade, and (6) political processes and influence within CITES.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abdullah, A., Or, O.C., Fadzil, K.S., 2011. Collectors and Traders. A Study of Orang Asli Involvement in Wildlife Trade in the Belum-Temengor Complex, Perak. Centre for Malaysian Indigenous Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
    • Abensperg-Traun, M., 2009. CITES, sustainable use of wild species and incentive-driven conservation in developing countries, with an emphasis on southern Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142, 948-963.
    • Abensperg-Traun, M., Roe, D., O'Criodain, C., 2011. CITES and CBNRM. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium on The Relevance of CBNRM to the Conservation and Sustainable use of CITES-listed Species in Exporting Countries. Vienna, Austria, 18-20 May 2011, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, IIED, London, UK.
    • Amin, R., Thomas, K., Emslie, R.H., Foose, T.J., Van Strien, N., 2006. An overview of the conservation status of and threats to rhinoceros species in the wild. Int. Zoo Yearb. 40, 96-117.
    • Aziz, S.A., Clements, G.R., Rayan, D.M., Sankar, P., 2013. Why conservationists should be concerned about natural resource legislation affecting indigenous peoples' rights: lessons from Peninsular Malaysia. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 639-656.
    • Baker, C.S., Cooke, J.G., Lvary, S., Dalebout, M.L., Ma, Y.-U., Funahasi, N., Carraher, C., Brownell Jr., R.L., 2007. Estimating the number of whales entering trade using DNA profiling and capture-recapture analysis of market products. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2617-2626.
    • Barber-Meyer, S.M., 2010. Dealing with the clandestine nature of wildlife-trade market surveys. Conserv. Biol. 24, 918-923.
    • Bezuijen, M.R., Cox Jr., J.H., Thorbjarnarson, J.B., Phothitay, C., Hedemark, M., Rasphone, A., 2013. Status of Siamese Crocodile (Crocodylus siamensis) Schneider, 1801 (Reptilia: Crocodylia) in Laos. J. Herpetol. 47, 41-65.
    • Biggs, D., Courchamp, F., Martin, R.B., Possingham, H., 2013. Legal trade of Africa's rhino horns. Science 339, 1038-1039.
    • Birdlife, 2011. Review of the illegal killing and trapping of birds in Europe. In: European Conference on Illegal Killing of Birds, Larnaca, Cyprus, 6-8 July, pp. 1-76.
    • Born Free, , 2007. Inconvenient but true. The unrelenting global trade in elephant ivory. Report Prepared for the 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES 3rd-15th June 2007. The Hague The Born Free Foundation.
    • Bowman, M., 2013. A tale of two CITES: divergent perspectives on upon the effectiveness of the wildlife trade convention. RECIAL 22 (3), 228-238.
    • Broad, S., Mulliken, T., Roe, D., 2003. The nature and extent of legal and illegal trade in wildlife. In: Oldfield, S. (Ed.), The Trade in Wildlife. Regulation for Conservation. Earthscan, London, pp. 3-22.
    • Brook, S.M., Van Coeverden de Groot, P., Scott, C., Boag, C., Long, B., Ley, R.E., Reischer, G.H., Williams, A.C., Mahood, S.P., Hien, T.M., Polet, G., Cox, N., Hai, B.T., 2012. Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam. Biol. Conserv. 155, 59-67.
    • Brooks, E.G.E., Roberton, S.I., Bell, S.I., 2010. The conservation impact of commercial wildlife farming of porcupines in Vietnam. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2808-2814.
    • Bryant, R.L., 2009. Born to be wild? Non-governmental organisations, politics and the environment. Geogr. Compass 3, 1541-1558.
    • Bulte, E.H., Damania, R., 2005. An economic assessment of wildlife farming and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1222-1233.
    • Burn, R.W., Underwood, F.M., Blanc, J., 2011. Global trends and factors associated with the illegal killing of elephants: a hierarchical Bayesian analysis of carcass encounter data. PLoS One 6, 1-10.
    • Butchart, S., et al., 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164-1168.
    • Carpenter, A.I., Robson, O., Rowcliffe, J.M., Watkinson, A.R., 2005. The impacts of international and national governance changes on a traded resource: a case study of Madagascar and its chameleon trade. Biol. Conserv. 123, 279-287.
    • Challender, D.W.S., 2011. Asian pangolins: increasing affluence driving hunting pressure. TRAFFIC Bull. 23, 92-93.
    • Challender, D.W.S., Hywood, L., 2012. African pangolins under increased pressure from poaching and international trade. TRAFFIC Bull. 24, 53-55.
    • Challender, D.W.S., MacMillan, D.C., 2014. Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conserv. Lett. 7 (5), 484-494.
    • Challender, D., Nguyen Van, T., Shepherd, C., Krishnasamy, K., Wang, A., Lee, B., Panjang, E., Fletcher, L., Heng, S., Seah Han Ming, J., Olsson, A., Nguyen The Truong, A., Nguyen Van, Q., Chung, Y., 2014. Manis javanica. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.2 www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed 29 July 2014).
    • CITES, 2002. Economics incentives and trade policy (Doc. 18). In: 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, Santiago, Chile, 3-15 November 2002. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • CITES, 2012. Evaluation of the review of significant trade [Decision 13.67 (Rev. CoP14)]. In: Joint Sessions of the 26th Meeting of the Animals Committee and 20th Meeting of the Plants Committee, Dublin, Ireland, 22-24 March 2012 (AC26/PC20 Doc. 7).
    • CITES, 2013a. CITES (1973-2013) Regulating the world's wildlife trade. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • CITES, , 2013b. Amendments to Appendices I and II of the Convention adopted by the Conference of the Parties at its 16th meeting, Bangkok, Thailand, 3-14 March 2013. Notification to the Parties No. 2013/20. CITES, Geneva, Switzerland.
    • CITES, 2013c. Status of legislative progress for implementing CITES. CoP16 Doc. 28, Annex 2 (Rev.1). CITES, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • No similar publications.