LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Di Pietro, G. (2017)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: UOW11

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Research across several countries has shown that degree classification (i.e. the final grade awarded to students successfully completing university) is an important determinant of graduates’ first destination outcome. Graduates leaving university with higher degree classifications have better employment opportunities and a higher likelihood of continuing education relative to those with lower degree classifications. This article investigates whether one of the reasons for this result is that employers and higher education institutions use degree classification as a signalling device for the ability that recent graduates may possess. Given the large number of applicants and the amount of time and resources typically required to assess their skills, employers and higher education institutions may decide to rely on this measure when forming beliefs about recent graduates’ abilities. Using data on two cohorts of recent graduates from a UK university, results suggest that an Upper Second degree classification may have a signalling role.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Angrist, Joshua D., Guido W. Imbens, and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. “Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 444-455.
    • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1973. “Higher education as a filter.” Journal of Public Economics 2 (3): 193-216.
    • Branine, Mohamed. 2008. “Graduate recruitment and selection in the UK: A study of the recent changes in methods and expectations.” Career Development International 13 (6): 497- 513.
    • Bratti, Massimiliano, Abigail McKnight, Robin Naylor, and Jeremy Smith. 2004. “Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 167 (3): 475-496.
    • Bruwer, Johan. 1999. “First destination graduate employment as key performance indicator: Outcomes assessment perspectives.” Australasian Association for Institutional Research Journal 8(2). Accessed October 20, 2015.
    • http://www.aair.org.au/app/webroot/media/pdf/JIR/Journal%20of%20Institutional%20Resear ch%20in%20Australasia%20and%20JIR/Volume%208,%20No.%202%20September%20199 9/Bruwer.pdf Pellegrini, Guido, Flavia Terribile, Ornella Tarola, Teo Muccigrosso, and Federica Busillo. 2012. “Measuring the effect of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach.” Papers in Regional Science 92 (1): 217-233.
    • Richards, Ellen W. 1984. “Undergraduate preparation and early career outcomes: A study of recent college graduates.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 54 (3): 279-304.
    • Saks, Alan M., and Blake E. Ashforth. 1999. “Effects of individual differences and job search behaviors on the employment status of recent university graduates.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 24 (3): 335-349.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article