LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Brockway, Dominic Stephen (2016)
Publisher: University of Huddersfield
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: L1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
The title of this article is inspired by a teacher trainee who used this expression to refer to teaching observations undertaken by Teacher Educators on teacher training courses. The expression is suggestive of a problematic view of lesson observations. This article seeks to examine the perspectives of in-service teacher trainees on this issue. \ud \ud Mixed research methods were used, focusing on real-life contexts and perspectives. The first research method involved a survey that aimed to determine trainees’ perspectives and identify a sample of their views. A key feature of this survey was that it required that trainees provide a commentary in which they were asked to provide a rationale for their answers.\ud \ud Some of the survey questions could be interpreted as leading questions, but these same questions were then totally re-framed during the focus groups using language indicative of an antithetical viewpoint to those asked during the survey. It was hoped that this would encourage a more dialectical debate and search for new perspectives and interpretations of the data. This is also a technique cited by Moore (2000) with regard to dialectical research and analysis. The use of a range of data collection methods and reasonable sample size (32) also helps to support the validity of the overall data. \ud \ud The rationale was to gain an insight into trainees’ perspectives on lesson observations. To do this, a survey was conducted, which was then followed up with two focus groups. The purpose of the focus groups was to open up a more exploratory discussion where contrasting opinions were encouraged. This research concluded with two in-depth interviews with teacher trainees to discuss their specific perspectives. \ud \ud The purpose of the interviews was to review a range of strategies, which might be used to help observers support staff and teacher trainees to create more effective teaching and learning observations. The findings from this research highlighted key issues with regard to graded teaching and learning observations. A range of recommendations is offered to help. Some changes to the approach of initial teaching providers are suggested, in addition to opening spaces for trainees and teacher trainers to explore these issues. The trainees surveyed welcomed these suggestions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Derrick, J. (2011) 'The Craft So Long To Lerne'. Adults Learning. Vol. 22, Issue 8, pp. 8-11.
    • Edgington, U. (2013) 'Performativity And Affectivity: Lesson Observations In England's Further Education Colleges'. Management In Education. Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 138-145.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0892020613485533 Ellström, P. (2006) The Meaning And Role Of Reflection In Informal Learning At Work.
    • Gebhard, G., Oprandy, R. (1999) Language Teaching Awareness: A Guide To Exploring Beliefs And Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Hill, H.C., Charalambos, Y., Kraft, M.A. (2012) 'When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough: Teacher Observation Systems And A Case For The Generalizability Study'. Educational Researcher. Vol. 41, Issue 2, pp. 56-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12437203 Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) 'Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come'. Educational Researcher. Vol. 33, Issue 7, pp. 14-26.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014 Kane, T.J., Staiger, D.O. (2012) Gathering Feedback For Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations With Student Surveys And Achievement Gains. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: San Francisco.
    • Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B.P.M. (2008) 'Using A Multidimensional Approach To Measure The Impact Of Classroom-Level Factors Upon Student Achievement: A Study Testing The Validity Of The Dynamic Model'. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 183-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243450802047873 Lasagabaster, D., Sierra, J.M. (2011) 'Classroom Observation: Desirable Conditions Established By Teachers'. European Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 34, Issue 4, pp.
    • 449-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.587113 Lin, X., Schwartz, D.L., Hatano, G. (2005) 'Toward Teachers' Adaptive Metacognition'.
    • Educational Psychologist. Vol. 40, Issue 4, pp. 245-255.
    • http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6 Masters, P. (1983) 'The Etiquette of Observing'. TESOL Quarterly. Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 497- 501. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586266 Moore, R.C. (2000) 'One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias'. Choice Reviews Online. Vol. 37, Issue 6, pp. 36-37.
    • Morgan, D.L. (1993) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing The State Of The Art. London, Newbury Park: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article