Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Siegel, Joel (2011)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: DS101, L1, HT0051
This research explored the process of creating a shared future and the evolution of cooperative collective endeavours in a regional rural community through a bottom-up planning process that involved professionals, public leadership and residents of a rural region in Israel. Using the MT rural region in Israel as a case study, the research was an interpretive exploration of how this community changed the way it collectively functions to achieve individual and shared aspirations. It examined how the community restructured its patterns of interaction, changing the social dynamics – which people interacted with each other, how they interacted with each other, and who felt committed to whom.\ud \ud The motivation for this inquiry stemmed from my desire as a practitioner to better understand the processes by which communities learn to function cooperatively. What are the elements that contributed to enabling a community to create the conditions for collectively utilizing and sustaining common resources rather than dividing them up for private consumption and exploitative narrow interests? What type of cooperative mechanisms enabled people to accomplish together what they cannot accomplish alone?\ud \ud Specifically, there are three research questions: how the change process was initiated in MT, what was significant in the nature of participation in the planning process, and how the mechanisms for regional community cooperation evolved.\ud \ud It was a case study of the planning and development process that I facilitated in MT from 1994-1999 (prior to my intention to undertake research) and is based mainly upon recent interviews of the participants (in that process), their recollections, and retrospective interpretations of that experience.\ud \ud The case has been explored from the theoretical perspective of viewing society in general, and community life in particular, as processes of constructing shared social realities that produce certain collective behaviours of cooperation or non-cooperation (Berger and Luckmann, 1967). This research was about understanding the process of making social rules that incorporate shared meanings and sanctions (Giddens, 1986) for undertaking joint endeavours (Ostrom, 1990, 1992, Wenger, 1998).\ud \ud Specifically two primary insights have come out of this case analysis:\ud 1. In the MT case there was a mutually reinforcing three-way interplay between the strengthening of commitments to mutual care on the regional level, the instrumental benefits from cooperative/joint endeavours, and the envisioning of a shared future.\ud 2. The community development process was owned by the community (not by outside agencies) and they (the community members) set the rules for community involvement. They structured the social interactions which formed the basis for creating shared understandings as a collective to achieve their common future.\ud \ud These insights shed light on how a community's structuring of its interactions and development interventions influenced its ability to act in a collectively optimal manner. By looking at the interrelation between trust as a function of social esteem (Honneth, 1995) and risk taking linked to instrumental benefits of cooperation (Lewis, 2002; Taylor, 1976; White, 2003) we can better understand what contributes to the way some communities continue to miss opportunities (Ostrom 1992), while others are able to promote their collective development and mutual wellbeing. By examining the process of designing (not only the design itself) community development programmes (Block, 2009) and by observing participation not as technique but as an inherent part of the way a community begins structuring its social interactions with their tacit (Polanyi, 1966) and explicit meanings, we can better understand the role of practitioners.\ud \ud And finally, perhaps the elements of chance and opportunity that bring certain combinations of people together in a given time and space may need to be given more weight in what remains a very unpredictable non-linear field of professional practice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alexander, J.C. (2003). The Meaning of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, Oxford, England, Oxford University Press.
    • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London, England: Verso.
    • Anderson, D. and Gosselin, V. (2008). Private and public memories of Expo 67: a case study of recollections of Montreal's World's Fair, 40 years after the event, Museum and Society March 2008 6(1) 1-21.
    • Appelbaum, L. and Newman, D. (1997). Rural Trends in Israel and their Implications on Local Government, Jerusalem, Israel: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (Hebrew)
    • Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape our Decisions, Hammersmith, England: HarperCollins Publishers.
    • Aubert, V. (1967). Elements of Sociology, New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
    • Avineri, S. (1968). The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, NY: Basic Books.
    • Baron, S., Field, J., and Schuller, T. (eds.) (2000). Social Capital: Critical Perspectives, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance, New York, NY: The Free Press.
    • Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, London, England: University of California Press, Ltd.
    • Bobo, K., Kendall, J., and Max, S. (1991). Organizing for Social Change: Midwest Academy Manual for Activists, Santa Ana, CA: Seven Locks Press.
    • Bottomore, T.B. (1966). Classes in Modern Society, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice, Translated by R. Nice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Briggs, X. (2008). Democracy as Problem Solving: Civic Capacity in Communities Across the Globe, London, England: MIT
    • Burt, R.S. (1995). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, London, England: Harvard University Press.
    • Chambers, R. (2008). Revolutions in Development Inquiry, London, England: Earthscan.
    • Clausen, J.A., et al. (1968). Socialization and Society, Edited by J.A. Clausen, Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
    • Cleaver, F. (2001). 'Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development', in Cook, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? London, England: Zed Books, Ltd.
    • Cohen, A.P. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community, London, England: Routledge.
    • Cohen, M. (1994). The Wage of Lucien Goldmann: Tragedy, Dialectics, and a Hidden G-d, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Coleman, J.S. (1994). Foundations of Social Theory, London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    • Conway, B. (2003) Active Remembering, Selective Forgetting, and Collective Identity: The Case of Bloody Sunday, IDENTITY: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORY AND RESEARCH 2003, 3 (4), 305-323 http://www.leaonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S1532706XID0304_01?journalCode=id
    • Durlauf, S.N., and Young, H.P. (eds.) (2001). Social Dynamics, London, England: The MIT Press.
    • Eade, D. (ed.) (2003). Development Methods and Approaches: Critical Reflections, Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB.
    • Engel, E. (ed.) (1999). Community Development: From Theory to Practice (In Hebrew), Jerusalem, Israel: The Israel Association of Community Centres Ltd.
    • Ellison, R. (1947). Invisible Man, New York, NY: Signet Books.
    • Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity Youth and Crisis, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
    • Etzioni, A. (1995). Rights and the Common Good: The Communitarian Perspective, New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, Inc.
    • Finsterbusch, K., and Wolf, C.P. (eds.) (1977). Methodology of Social Impact Assessment, London, England: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    • Foucault, M. (1981). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972- 1977, Edited by C. Gordon, Translated by C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham and K. Soper, New York: Random House, Inc.
    • Fox Piven, F., and Cloward, R.A. (1970). Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare, USA: A Vintage Book.
    • Francis, P. (2001). 'Participatory Development at the World Band: The Primacy of Process', in Cook, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny? London, England: Zed Books, Ltd.
    • Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century, New York NY: Picador / Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    • Fromm, E. (1966). Marx's Concept of Man, New York, NY: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.
    • Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D.K. (1998). The Theory of Learning in Games, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Galliers, R. (ed.) (1987). Information Analysis: Selected Readings, Great Britain: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
    • Gallo, D. and Roediger H. (2002). 'Processes Affecting Accuracy and Memory Distortion: An Overview,' in Eisen, M. Quas, J. and Goodman, G. (eds) (2002). Memory and Suggestibility in the Forensic Interview, London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
    • Gill, J.H. (2000). The Tacit Mode: Michael Polanyi's Postmodern Philosophy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    • Gittell, R., and Vidal, A. (1998). Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy, London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
    • Goff, T.W. (1980). Marx and Mead: Contributions To a Sociology of Knowledge, London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
    • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings, New York, NY: The Free Press.
    • Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pelican Books.
    • Goldmann, L. (1980). Essays on Method in the Sociology of Literature, Translated and edited by W.Q. Boelhower, St. Louis, MO: Telos Press.
    • Goldsmith, S., and Eggers, W.D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
    • Hersey, P., and Blanchard, K.H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    • Hess, C., and Ostrom, E. (eds.) (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Hickey, S., and Mohan, G. (eds.) (2004). Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? London, England: Zed Books Ltd.
    • Honneth, A. (2008). Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, Edited by M. Jay, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
    • Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Translated by J. Anderson, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    • Lesser, E.L. (ed.) (2000). Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics, Edited by G.W. Lewin, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    • Lewis, D. (2002). Convention: A Philosophical Study, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
    • Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ling, R. (2008). New Techs, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion, London, England: The MIT Press.
    • Lyng, S., and Franks, D.D. (2002). Sociology and the Real World, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
    • Merton, R.K., and Nisbet, R.A. (1961 2nd ed). Contemporary Social Problems, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
    • Rosolio, D. (1999). The System and the Crisis - Crises, Accommodations, and Changes in the Kibbutz Movement, Tel Aviv, Israel: Am Oved. (Hebrew)
    • Rousseau, J.J. (1973). The Social Contract and Discourses, Translated by G.D.H. Cole, London, UK: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article