LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Grundmann, Reiner
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In present day knowledge societies political decisions are often justified on the basis of scientific expertise. Traditionally, a linear relation between knowledge production and application was postulated which would lead, with more and better science, to better policies. Empirical studies in Science and Technology studies have essentially demolished this idea. However, it is still powerful, not least among practitioners working in fields where decision making is based on large doses of expert knowledge. Based on conceptual work in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) I shall examine two cases of global environmental governance, ozone layer protection and global climate change. I will argue that hybridization and purification are important for two major forms of scientific expertise. One is delivered though scientific advocacy (by individual scientists or groups of scientists), the other through expert committees, i.e. institutionalized forms of collecting and communicating expertise to decision makers. Based on this analysis lessons will be drawn, also with regard to the stalling efforts at establishing an international forestry regime.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., Hardin, R., 2008. Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320 (5882), 1460-1462.
    • Arnold, R., Whitford, A.B., 2006. Making environmental self-regulation mandatory. Global Environmental Politics 6 (4), 1-12.
    • Brooks, H., 1982. Stratospheric ozone, the scientific community and public policy. In: Frank, A., Ward, Bower/Richard B. (Eds.), Stratospheric Ozone and Man. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 201-216.
    • Andresen, S., Agrawala, S., 2002. Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regime. Global Environmental Change 12, 41-51.
    • Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society. Polity, Cambridge.
    • Benedick, R.E., 1991. Ozone Diplomacy, New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
    • Betsill, M., Pielke Jr., R.,1998. Blurring the boundaries: domestic and international ozone politics and lessons for climate change. International Environmental Affairs 10, 147-172.
    • Bonan, G.B., 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320 (5882), 1444-1449.
    • Bush, V., 1945. Science The Endless Frontier. United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
    • Cashore, B., Gale, F., Meidinger, E., Newsom, D., 2006. Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries. Yale University, New Haven, CT.
    • Dimitrov, R., 2005. Precaution in global environmental politics. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 5 (1/2), 96-113.
    • Elzinga, A., 1995. Shaping worldwide consensus: the orchestration of global climate change research. In: Elzinga, A., Lundström, C. (Eds.), Internationalism in Science. Taylor and Graham, London, pp. 223-255.
    • Freer-Smith, P.H., 2007. Environmental change and the sustainability of European forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 264, 165-186.
    • Freer-Smith, P.H., Carnus, J.M., 2008. The sustainable management and protection of forests: analysis of the current position globally. Ambio 37 (4), 254-262.
    • Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25, 739-755.
    • Gibbons, M., et al., 1994. The new production of knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
    • Grundmann, R., 2001. Transnational Environmental Policy. Routledge, London.
    • Grundmann, R., 2005. Ozone and climate: scientific consensus and leadership. Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (1), 73-101.
    • Grundmann, R., 2007. Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics 16 (3), 416-434.
    • Gullison, R.E., et al., 2007. Tropical forests and climate policy. Science 316, 985-986 (18 May).
    • Haas, P.M., 2004. When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy 11:4, 569-592.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article