Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Elmogla, Mahmoud
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: H1, HG
The social and economic environments of developing countries differ from those of liberal market economies of the developed countries, and the differences are reflected in the accounting disclosure practices. Recent years have shown an increased attention paid by accounting research to Corporate Social Responsibility and Disclosure which is recognized as having the potential to enhance the transparency of business enterprises’ social influence, enabling the wider society to hold business enterprises more accountable for their operations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Disclosure practices in most developing countries remain fairly rudimentary and relatively few studies have focused on the corporate social responsibility disclosure practices in such countries.\ud The aim of this study is to investigate corporate social responsibility disclosure in Libyan companies’ annual reporting in the light of the country’s economic, social and political environment. In particular, it seeks to map current corporate social disclosure in annual reports and to understand various parties’ views of that practice and its possible future development.\ud To achieve the aim and particular objectives of the study it was necessary to utilise more than one research method. Firstly, a descriptive method is used to provide an overview of accounting and its environment in a developing country, and the economic, social and political environment in Libya. Secondly, empirical evidence\ud covering a five year period across a sample of private and public companies in Libyan environment is presented using content analysis to analyse the companies’ annual reports. Finally, an empirical survey by personally delivered and collected questionnaire of 303 participants in four groups of research participants (academic accountants, financial managers, government officials and investors) was performed to explore the views and perceptions regarding corporate social reporting in Libya.\ud The content analysis showed that Libyan companies generally disclose some information related to social responsibility. However, the amount of information is low compared with counterparts in developed countries. Employee and community\ud involvement are the themes that the companies disclose most information about. The findings from the questionnaire survey indicate that participants preferred social information to be disclosed in the annual report, ideally placed in a separate section. The disclosure of more social and environmental information was widely accepted\ud and viewed as leading to some socioeconomic benefits at the macro level.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Figure 5-1: Proportion of Disclosure (2005).......................................................................... 154 Figure 5-2: Basic Data Disclosure (Words- non Financial) for All Companies 2005 ........... 165 Figure 5-3: Training Disclosure (Words-Non Financial) for All Companies 2005............... 166 Figure 5-4: Benefits in Kind Disclosure (Words-non Financial) for All Companies 2005 ... 166 Figure 5-5: Community Disclosure (Words- non financial) for All companies (2005)......... 174 Figure 5-6: Environmental Disclosure (Words-Non Financial) for all Companies 2005 ...... 178 Figure 5-7: Waste, Pack, Pollution, Recycle, Product, Land Disclosure (Words-non Financial) for all Companies 2005................................................................................................... 179 1.1 Introduction and Background..................................................................................13 1.2 Background, Literature and Justification for the Research.............................14 1.5 Research Importance and Contribution……........................................................21 Ince, D. (1998). Corporate social and environmental reporting an application of stakeholder theory. Unpublished Ph.D, Exeter University.
    • Iqbal, M. Z., Melcher, T. U., & Elmallah, A. A. (1997). International accounting : a global perspective. [Cincinnati, Ohio]: South-Western College Pub.
    • Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(6).
    • Ite, U. E. (2004). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 1- 11.
    • Jackson, P. M. (1982). The political economy of bureaucracy. Deddington: Philip Allan.
    • Jaeger, A. M. (1986). Organization development and national culture: where's the fit? Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 178-190.
    • Jaggi, B. (1975). The impact of the culture on financial disclousres. The International Journal of Accounting, Spring, 75-84.
    • Jaggi, B., & Low, P. Y. (2000). Impact of culture, market forces, and legal system on financial disclosures. The International Journal of Accounting, 35(4), 495-519.
    • Jahamani, Y. F. (2003). Green accounting in developing countries: the case of U.A.E. and Jordan. Managerial Finance, 29(8), 37 - 45.
    • Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 243-262.
    • Janes, J. (1999). Survey construction. Library Hi Tech, 17(3), 321 - 325.
    • Janggu, T., Joseph, C., & Madi, N. (2007). The Current State of Corporate Social Responsibility Among Industrial Companies in Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 3(3), 9 - 18.
    • Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(1), 23-34.
    • Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (1997). Exploring corporate strategy. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall Europe.
    • Johnson, P., & Duberley, J. (2000). Understanding management research an introduction to epistemology. London ; Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
    • Jones, K. L. (2002). Corporate environmental disclosure : The medium and the message. Unpublished PhD, University of Sunderland
    • Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221.
    • Key, S. (1999). Toward a new theory of the firm: a critique of stakeholder `theory.' Management Decision, 37(3/4), 317.
    • Khan, M. H.-U.-Z., Halabi, A. K., & Samy, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting: a study of selected banking companies in Bangladesh. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 344 - 357.
    • Kilani, A. K. (1988). The evolution and status of accounting in Libya. Unpublished PhD Hull, Hull.
    • Kisenyi, V., & Gray, R. (1998). Social disclosure in Uganda. Social and Environmental Accounting, 18(2), 16-18.
    • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: a introduction to its methodology. London: Sage Publications.
    • Kumar, R. (1999). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications.
    • Laughlin, R. (1995). Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middlerange” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(1), 63 - 87.
    • Lehman, C. R. (1992). Accounting's changing role in social conflict. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
    • Lewis, L., & Unerman, J. (1999). Ethical relativism: a reason for differences in corporate social reporting? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10(4), 521-547.
    • Lewis, M. K. (2001). Islam and accounting. Accounting Forum, 25(2), 103.
    • O'Dwyer, B., & Gray, R. (1998). Corporate social reporting in the republic of ireland: a longitudinal study. Irish Accounting Review, 5(2), 1-34.
    • O'Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics.
    • Oppenheim, A., & Naftail, A. (2000 ). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.
    • Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire Desing, Interviewing and attitude Measurement. London: Pinter.
    • Owen, D., Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (1997). Green accounting: cosmetic irrelevance or radical agenda for change. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 4(2), 175-198.
    • Owen, D., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264.
    • Owen, D., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81-98.
    • Oxford Business Group. (2009). The report Libya 2008. London.
    • Paine, L. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106-117.
    • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Patten, D. (1990). The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures: the case of the Sullivan principles signings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(6), 575-587.
    • Patten, D. (1991a). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297-308.
    • Patten, D. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
    • Patten, D. M. (1991b). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297-308.
    • Perera, M. (1989). Towards a framework to analyse the impact of culture on accounting. International Journal of Accounting, 24, 42-56.
    • Perks, R. W. (1993). Accounting and society. London: Chapman & Hall.
    • Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785-802.
    • Potluri, R. M., Batima, Y., & Madiyar, K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: a study of Kazakhstan corporate sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1), 33 - 44.
    • Prado-Lorenzo, J., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. (2009). Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 94-107.
    • Pratten, J. D., & Mashat, A. A. (2009). Corporate social disclosure in Libya. Social Responsibility Journal, 5(3), 311 - 327.
    • Radebaugh, L. H., & Gray, S. J. (2002). International accounting and multinational enterprises. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
    • Radiebaugh, L. H. (1975). Environmental factors influencing the development of accounting objectives, standards, and practices in peru. The International Journal of Accounting Education and Research, 11(1), 39-56.
    • Rahaman, A., Lawrence, S., & Roper, J. (2004). Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(1), 35-56.
    • Ramanathan, K. V. (1976). Toward a theory of corporate social accounting. Accounting Review, 51(3), 516-528.
    • Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Swartz, E. (1998). Doing research in business and management: an introduction to process and method. London: Sage publications.
    • Rizk, R., Dixon, R., & Woodhead, A. (2008). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a survey of disclosure practices in egypt. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(3), 306 - 323.
    • Robbina, W., & Austin, K. (1986). Disclosure quality in the governmental financial reports: an assessmrnt of the appropriateness of a compound measure. Journal of Accounting Research,Autumn, 412-421.
    • Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612.
    • Robertson, D. C., & Nicholson, N. (1996). Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(10), 1095-1106.
    • Rockness, J., & Williams, P. (1988). A descriptive study of social responsibility mutual funds. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(4), 397-411.
    • Rosser, A., & Edwin, D. (2010). The politics of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 1-22.
    • Ryan, B., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. T. (2002). Research method and methodology in finance & accounting. London: Thomson.
    • Sachs, J. D. (1996). The transition at mid decade. American Economic Review, 86(2), 128.
    • Salama, A. (2009). Egypt: social responsibility disclosure practices. In I. Samuel & L. Walter (Eds.), Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 325-342). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    • Saleh, M. M. (2001). Accounting information disclosure and accountability: cases from Libya. Shefield Hallam University, Shefield.
    • Salter, S. B., & Doupnik, T. S. (1992). The relationship between legal systems and accounting systems internationally: a classification exercise. Advances in International Accounting, 5, 3- 22.
    • Salter, S. B., & Niswander, F. (1995). Cultural infulence on the development of accounting system internationally: a test of gray's [1988] theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(2), 379-397.
    • Samuel, I., & Walter, L. (2009). Global practices of corporate social responsibility Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    • Samuels, J. (1990a). Accounting for developing countries: an alternative approach. Research in Third World Accounting, 1, 67-86.
    • Samuels, J. (1990b). International accounting standards in the third world: A synthesis of six articles. Research in Third World Accounting, 2, 19-25.
    • Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thomhill, A. (2003). Research methods for busniess students. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    • Saunders, M., Philip, L., & Thornhill, A. (2000). Reasearch methodes for business students (2 ed.). Australia:pearson Education.
    • Schreuder, H. (1979). Corporate social reporting in the federal republic of germany: an overview. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 4(1/2), 109-122.
    • Sekaran, U. (2003). Reasearch methods for business: a skill building approach. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
    • Siegel, S., & Castellan, J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. London: McGraw-Hill.
    • Silberhorn, D., & Warren, R. C. (2007). Defining corporate social responsibility: a view from big companies in Germany and the UK. European Business Review, 19(5), 352-372.
    • Singh, D., & Ahuja, J. (1983). Corporate social reporting in india. International Journal of Accounting, 18(2), 151-169.
    • Smith, J., Adhikari, A., & Tondkar, R. H. (2005). Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: a stakeholder perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 123-151.
    • Smith, M., & Taffler, R. J. (1990). The predictive ability of the chairman's narrative: mass communication or corporate suiside note? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand (AAANZ),Perth,Western Australia,July.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article