Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mareschal, Denis; French, R.M. (2016)
Publisher: The Royal Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: psyc, Articles
Even newborn infants are able to extract structure from a stream of sensory inputs; yet how this is achieved remains largely a mystery. We present a connectionist autoencoder model, TRACX2, that learns to extract sequence structure by gradually constructing chunks, storing these chunks in a distributed manner across its synaptic weights and recognizing these chunks when they re-occur in the input stream. Chunks are graded rather than all-or-nothing in nature. As chunks are learnt their component parts become more and more tightly bound together. TRACX2 successfully models the data from five experiments from the infant visual statistical learning literature, including tasks involving forward and backward transitional probabilities, low-salience embedded chunk items, part-sequences and illusory items. The model also captures performance differences across ages through the tuning of a single-learning rate parameter. These results suggest that infant statistical learning is underpinned by the same domain-general learning mechanism that operates in auditory statistical learning and, potentially, in adult artificial grammar learning.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 10.3758/MC.36.7.1299 [19] Perruchet, P., & Vinter, A. (1998). PARSER: A model for word segmentation.
    • Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 246-263. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2576 [20] Cleeremans, A. and McClelland, J. (1991). Graded state machines: The
    • Learning, 7, 161-193. DOI 10.1023/A:1022647012398 [21] Brent, M. and Cartwright, T. (1996). Distributional regularity and phonotactic
    • constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition, 61(1), 93-125. DOI:
    • 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00719-6 [22] Kirkham, N.Z., Slemmer, J.A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in
    • infancy: evidence of a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.
    • DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00004-5 [23] French, R. M. and Cottrell, G. (2014). TRACX 2.0: A memory-based, biologically-
    • Society, 2016-2221. [24] Bornstein, M. H., Pecheux, M.G, Lecuyer, R. (1988) Visual habituation in human
    • infants: development and rearing circumstances. Psychological Research, 50, 130-
    • 133. [25] Colombo, J. & Mitchell, D. W. (2009) Infant visual habituation. Neurobiology of
    • Learning & Memory, 92, 225-234. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.06.002
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article